Illegal online casinos operate from Curaçao, Costa Rica or other tax havens around the world - in any case far away from Germany, according to popular belief. According to research by Bavarian broadcaster Bayerischer Rundfunk (BR), however, this may not be entirely true: in fact, BR suggests that a software company from Berlin is in charge of a whole series of unlicensed platforms that focus on the German market. The journalists draw complex connections between companies in Malta, Cyprus and Curaçao and the capital. We take a closer look at the situation.

German gambling regulation is fighting illegal providers on many fronts. However, success is limited. Prohibition proceedings, fines, IP blockades or payment blocking: all of these measures quickly reach their limits, especially when it comes to platforms from overseas. The enforcement of administrative penalties proves to be very difficult, especially outside the EU; providers can circumvent network blocks relatively easily by changing URLs, among other things, and modern payment methods, especially cryptocurrencies, are almost impossible to control. In October, we reported that GGL was also successful with payment blocking in Switzerland.

This makes the connections that a team of BR journalists recently analyzed and published in an "exclusive" article entitled "Gambling without rules" in the "Investigative" section of Tagesschau.de seem all the more delicate: Who would have thought that some of the string-pullers could be located right in the German capital? According to the authors, the Berlin-based IT company SOFTSWISS, which is well known in the industry, is more deeply involved in the structures of unlicensed online casinos than it appears at first glance. The company primarily offers management solutions for gambling platforms. In the summer of 2024, we reported that SOFTSWISS provided insider insights into the use of social casinos as part of a big data analysis.

According to the report, SOFTSWISS itself is also involved in casinos that are specifically aimed at the German market - but are not licensed in Germany - via a complex network of companies that is said to extend from Malta to Cyprus and Curaçao.

So far, nothing has been proven and the Joint Gambling Authority of the federal states (GGL) is holding back on commenting. The matter is unlikely to be closed with the BR report. The central questions we want to ask ourselves here are: What did the BR journalists find out and how incriminating are the facts really?

What or who is SOFTSWISS?

SOFTSWISS was founded in 2009 by Ivan Montik. The company originally started out as an online auction platform. in 2013, as one of the pioneers in this segment, it introduced a BTC-optimized solution for the B2B iGaming market. Under Montik's leadership, SOFTSWISS has developed into a major provider of technical infrastructure for the gaming industry.

Its products include casino platforms for the management of user accounts and bonus programs, a game aggregator that bundles games from various studios and a solution for the management of online lotteries. SOFTSWISS also provides programs for sports betting and for the organization of jackpot campaigns. The company operates internationally and employs over 2,000 people at branches in several countries, including Germany, Malta, Poland and Georgia.

Complex connections and transactions worth millions: This is the puzzle BR is putting together around SOFTSWISS and its partners

The accusations made by BR against the Berlin-based company SOFTSWISS are very serious - but so far they are merely suspicions. What is clear is that the journalists' research has brought to light a dense network of companies and suspected connections that raises a number of questions.

  • Focus on N1 Interactive Ltd. and Dama N.V.: According to the BR article, the analysis of imprint details on hundreds of illegal casino websites revealed two companies in particular: N1 Interactive Ltd. on Malta and Dama N.V. on Curaçao. According to research in court documents, company and domain registers, both brands are repeatedly associated with SOFTSWISS or its founder. By the way, in August 2024 we asked ourselves what life is like on Curaçao.
  • Transfers in the millions: The BR journalists see complicated business structures in the connections to Malta and Curaçao, which, according to one expert quoted, are often aimed at concealing ownership or avoiding tax payments. A transfer document from Malta is cited, which is said to show a transaction of two million euros from N1 Interactive to Dama N.V. in March 2022. At that time, N1 Interactive's account balance was more than seven million euros - an indication that large sums were being moved here.
  • In Wirecard's customer base: Another connection goes back to the scandal-ridden Wirecard Bank. According to BR, SOFTSWISS appears as a customer in its insolvency documents - in direct connection with a suspected predecessor company of Dama N.V. In 2018, the latter is said to have processed payments of around 61 million euros via Wirecard, making the company one of the bank's highest-turnover customers at times. Emails from the Wirecard manager at the time, Jan Marsalek, are also said to indicate that a closely cooperating network existed. Marsalek had personally requested sales reports from these companies in 2020.
  • Suspicious Google adsand domain registration: Dama N.V. is said to have placed Google ads for job vacancies in the summer of 2024 - not for itself, but for SOFTSWISS. This is confirmed by the search engine giant's advertising register. According to BR, the fact that a casino domain operated by Dama was originally registered with an email address from SOFTSWISS - including the founder's first name - fits in with this. Incidentally, Google only allows advertising for legal gambling in Germany via its system - since September 2024.

Despite these links, the BR journalists suggest that many questions remain unanswered. They clearly state that the presumption of innocence applies.

Neither SOFTSWISS nor its founder have responded to questions from BR. GGL merely stated that SOFTSWISS does not have a license in Germany and has not applied for one. It was not possible to elicit from the authorities whether investigations are underway in the background.

Conclusion

BR's research raises legitimate questions about the links between SOFTSWISS and online casinos that are illegal in Germany. On closer inspection, however, some of the points raised seem less clear-cut than they appear at first glance.

  • On its website, SOFTSWISS itself openly presents partnerships with platforms that are clearly attributable to the companies on which BR bases a large part of its conclusions. However, SOFTSWISS makes it transparent that it has provided or continues to provide certain services for these brands. The transactions in the millions cited by BR could quite plausibly be explained by extensive software deals between the companies, without the payments necessarily having to indicate a leading role for SOFTSWISS in the business activities of the casinos in question.
  • At the same time, there are aspects that should be viewed more critically: The alleged placement of advertisements by Dama N.V. on behalf of SOFTSWISS as well as the registration of a casino domain with an e-mail address of SOFTSWISS could indeed indicate closer links. However, it remains unclear to what extent they actually prove an active role of SOFTSWISS in the business of these platforms. There is a need for further clarification here.

Ultimately, the BR report does not provide any clear evidence that SOFTSWISS is pulling the strings with illegal providers.

The fact that the company from Germany works with platforms that are considered illegal in this country is undoubtedly questionable, but not automatically an indication of potentially criminal behavior. As with many issues of this kind, crucial details that would be essential for an exact classification remain unclear. The report is therefore an important impetus for further investigations, but also an example of how complex the international gambling industry is. Last but not least, it shows that it can be worth taking a closer look even at established press organs.

Source of the image: https://pixabay.com/photos/knowledge-curiosity-confusion-ocean-3255140/

What do you think of the article?

0 Comments to: BR reveals Berlin connections to illegal online casinos: How clear is the evidence?

write a comment

Our community thrives on your feedback - so let us know what you think!

Would you like to write comments on GambleJoe yourself? Then just create a GambleJoe User Account.

  • upload your own winning pictures or videos
  • rate online casinos and slot machines
  • write comments and take part in our forum
  • take part in the monthly GJ Coin lottery
  • and much more