You're right about that too, although I wouldn't neglect the Risk of moving either. Even with a 1.01 you have to calculate a certain risk when wagering
if possible always left pocket, right pocket....1.01 too dangerous
You're right about that too, although I wouldn't neglect the Risk of moving either. Even with a 1.01 you have to calculate a certain risk when wagering
current e.g. Bet365 Real wins to zero: Q 6.0 / Qbet: Real to zero No 1.18. You can also bring large amounts to dry in no time with only a small loss margin. At 1.2 would be par. Winamax is not involved right now, but you have to take a closer look when the prematch estimates something good, which sometimes happens
Langhans_innen wrote on 12.03.2025 at 16:40:
akt. e.g. Bet365 Real wins to zero: Q 6,0 / Qbet: Real to zero No 1,18. There you can also bring large amounts to dry in no time with only a small loss margin. At 1.2 would be par. Winamax is not involved right now, but you have to take a closer look when the prematch estimates something good, which sometimes happens
Yes, I think the best bets are basketball/handball/tennis where there is no X or bets like the one you selected or "number of even/odd goals".
You just have to be able to calculate how much you have to bet for one party or the other.
Yes, I think the best bets are basketball/handball/tennis where there is no X or bets like the one you selected or "number of goals even/odd" .
You just have to be able to calculate how much you have to bet for one party or the other.
Women's doubles often lend themselves to this - the bookmakers often disagree on how to assess the balance of power . Therefore, outlier odds are often available that are significantly better than the broad market - then the counter bet is quickly added. Unfortunately, in tennis there is always a certain Risk of the bet being canceled, which is why you have to be careful who you bet with. In my opinion, the following is also very productive for such purposes: Team XY goal count +/-0.5 (HZ). You regularly find worthwhile constellations.
The even/odd (in soccer) is not recommended at all. More or less based almost exclusively on chance: the bookmaker also knows this, which is why there is usually only an 85 RTP and the odds are relatively static at around 1.85. It quickly gets expensive on the left/right. Oh yes, a nice topic... Edit: Real to zero no now 1.19...only a hundredth is missing to the surebet
Langhans_innen wrote on 12.03.2025 at 17:59:
Women's doubles often lends itself to this - the bookmakers often disagree on how to assess the balance of power . Therefore, outlier odds are often available that are significantly better than the broad market - then the counter bet is quickly made. Unfortunately, in tennis there is always a certain Risk of the bet being canceled, which is why you have to be careful who you bet with. In my opinion, the following is also very productive for such purposes: Team XY goal count +/-0.5 (HZ). You regularly find worthwhile constellations.
The even/odd (in soccer) is not recommended at all. More or less based almost exclusively on chance: the bookmaker also knows this, which is why there is usually only an 85 RTP and the odds are relatively static at around 1.85. It quickly gets expensive on the left/right. Oh yes, a nice topic... Edit: Real to zero no now 1.19...only a hundredth is missing to the surebet
I had actually forgotten about the cancelation! Yes, interesting topic, also for certain groups who want to "convert" their money Incidentally, I've always done this at a casino with Roulette and color, even if there is a risk of 0. Fortunately, I'm no longer forced to use it^^ But the wagering was 10x for Table games - or you played slots. I've almost given up on the latter. The last time was Sweet Bonanza 2 years ago.
Sports betting tips 2025
Liked this post:
frapi07
if possible always left pocket, right pocket....1.01 too dangerous
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Liked this post:
frapi07
current e.g. Bet365 Real wins to zero: Q 6.0 / Qbet: Real to zero No 1.18. You can also bring large amounts to dry in no time with only a small loss margin. At 1.2 would be par. Winamax is not involved right now, but you have to take a closer look when the prematch estimates something good, which sometimes happens
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Liked this post:
Langhans_innen
Yes, I think the best bets are basketball/handball/tennis where there is no X or bets like the one you selected or "number of even/odd goals".
You just have to be able to calculate how much you have to bet for one party or the other.
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Liked this post:
frapi07
Women's doubles often lend themselves to this - the bookmakers often disagree on how to assess the balance of power . Therefore, outlier odds are often available that are significantly better than the broad market - then the counter bet is quickly added. Unfortunately, in tennis there is always a certain Risk of the bet being canceled, which is why you have to be careful who you bet with. In my opinion, the following is also very productive for such purposes: Team XY goal count +/-0.5 (HZ). You regularly find worthwhile constellations.
The even/odd (in soccer) is not recommended at all. More or less based almost exclusively on chance: the bookmaker also knows this, which is why there is usually only an 85 RTP and the odds are relatively static at around 1.85. It quickly gets expensive on the left/right. Oh yes, a nice topic... Edit: Real to zero no now 1.19...only a hundredth is missing to the surebet
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Nobody has liked this post so far
You've convinced me! Fuffi on it.
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Nobody has liked this post so far
I had actually forgotten about the cancelation! Yes, interesting topic, also for certain groups who want to "convert" their money Incidentally, I've always done this at a casino with Roulette and color, even if there is a risk of 0. Fortunately, I'm no longer forced to use it^^ But the wagering was 10x for Table games - or you played slots. I've almost given up on the latter. The last time was Sweet Bonanza 2 years ago.
This post has been translated automatically