Patizi wrote on 10.03.2025 at 21:14: Yummy, yummy, yummy, tomorrow we're eating! Delicious odds. Can you actually eat odds or where does this "yummy" in odds come from?
Tend to play all CL games on 2.5 goals tomorrow. What do you think? Is that "tasty"?
Sports betting is like trying out a new pozza service. You only know if it was tasty afterwards and after you've paid.
But I always have an appetite for anything over 2.5, even if it often makes me want to puke afterwards.
Patizi wrote on 10.03.2025 at 21:14: Yummy, yummy, yummy, tomorrow we're eating! Delicious odds. Can you actually eat odds or where does this "yummy" in odds come from?
Tend to play all CL games on 2.5 goals tomorrow. What do you think? Is that "tasty"?
Bayer Leverkusen - Bayern Munich that's over. Nobody is motivated to score many goals anymore. Now Leverkusen's best Wirtz is injured for a long time and with a 0:3 in the back, there will be no more hunger for goals and Bayern can take it easy.
Patizi wrote on 10.03.2025 at 21:14: Yummy, yummy, yummy, tomorrow we're eating! Delicious odds. Can you actually eat odds or where does this "yummy" in odds come from?
Tend to play all CL games on 2.5 goals tomorrow. What do you think? Is that "tasty"?
Youth language. That's because many people use the verb "tasty" as a synonym for success. So if a quota was right, it tasted good and was therefore delicious.
Since I don't know if you were really asking yourself that, I've answered it ^^
Bayer Leverkusen - Bayern Munich that's over. Nobody is motivated to score many goals anymore. Now Leverkusen's best Wirtz is also injured for a long time and with a 0:3 in the back, there will be no more hunger for goals and Bayern in turn can take it easy.
I understand your point but I could imagine that Leverkusen will still try. If they give it away now then they'll get a second hammering. I could well imagine a 2:1. For whom, you can choose
frapi07 wrote on 10.03.2025 21:44:
Youth language. That's because many people use the verb "tastes" as a synonym for success. So if a quota was right, it tasted good and was therefore delicious.
Since I don't know if you were really asking yourself that, I've answered it ^^
So it's a thing of not really adults. I understand. I think that sounds really stupid. First of all, eat a delicious quota.
that in the last 3 weeks would have been a good budget for after the vacation with more energy then.
well too bad. I have to think about whether I Risk another 60 euros after the vacation? what do you think? would you trust me to hit such a 7 combo!"
You're simply asking the wrong question and I think that shows once again that you grossly underestimate the luck factor in betting...
A 7s combination with odds between 1.7 and 2.00 or so has, let's say, odds of 100.
This means that the odds calculated by the bookie are probably around 1:110 and because of his margin/house edge he only gives you 100 times instead of 110 times if you win.
Even if you could assess games much better than the bookie and thus create a combination whose probability of winning is higher than calculated by the bookie, you may still be in a probability range of 1:90. And the assumption is already enormously generous in your favor.
Now you may have created a combination with value in your favor, because you would get 100 times as much again, although the probability is actually 1:90 and not 1:100.
Nevertheless, it is still very unlikely that the combo will hit. About 2.5 times less likely than hitting the exact number in roulette. And this already takes into account, as described above, that you have gotten the best possible, actually almost impossibly much, out of the bets through your analysis. And that's where your influence ends, the rest is luck. That's a mathematical fact and there's no point in talking yourself into making mistakes etc. It's also not a mistake in Roulette not to have bet on the 10 when it comes up, just because you thought about the 10 for a moment beforehand.
So yes, I think you and a few others here are the most likely to do it. Nevertheless, with the odds assumed above, which are roughly the same as your tickets, it will cost you on average! 90 to 100 attempts cost...
You are simply asking the wrong question and I think that shows again that you grossly underestimate the luck factor in betting...
A 7-point combination with odds between 1.7 and 2.00 or so has, let's say, odds of 100.
This means that the odds calculated by the bookie are probably around 1:110 and because of his margin/house edge he only gives you 100 times instead of 110 times if you win.
Even if you could assess games much better than the bookie and thus create a combination whose probability of winning is higher than calculated by the bookie, you may still be in a probability range of 1:90. And the assumption is already enormously generous in your favor.
Now you may have created a combination with value in your favor, because you would get 100 times as much again, although the probability is actually 1:90 and not 1:100.
Nevertheless, it is still very unlikely that the combo will hit. About 2.5 times less likely than hitting the exact number in roulette. And this already takes into account, as described above, that you have gotten the best possible, actually almost impossibly much, out of the bets through your analysis. And that's where your influence ends, the rest is luck. It's a mathematical fact and there's no point in talking yourself into making mistakes etc. It's also not a mistake in Roulette not to have bet on the 10 when it comes up, just because you thought about the 10 for a moment beforehand.
So yes, I think you and a few others here are the most likely to do it. Nevertheless, with the odds assumed above, which are roughly the same as your tickets, it will cost you on average! 90 to 100 attempts cost...
AI says that a 6-player combination with odds between 1.67 and 2.30 has a win probability of 1.98 percent
Sports betting tips 2025
Liked this post:
Patizi,
Tobsen
Sports betting is like trying out a new pozza service. You only know if it was tasty afterwards and after you've paid.
But I always have an appetite for anything over 2.5, even if it often makes me want to puke afterwards.
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Liked this post:
Patizi,
Tobsen
Bayer Leverkusen - Bayern Munich that's over. Nobody is motivated to score many goals anymore. Now Leverkusen's best Wirtz is injured for a long time and with a 0:3 in the back, there will be no more hunger for goals and Bayern can take it easy.
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Liked this post:
Patizi
Youth language. That's because many people use the verb "tasty" as a synonym for success. So if a quota was right, it tasted good and was therefore delicious.
Since I don't know if you were really asking yourself that, I've answered it ^^
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Nobody has liked this post so far
Great comment
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Liked this post:
frapi07
I understand your point but I could imagine that Leverkusen will still try. If they give it away now then they'll get a second hammering. I could well imagine a 2:1. For whom, you can choose
So it's a thing of not really adults. I understand. I think that sounds really stupid. First of all, eat a delicious quota.
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Nobody has liked this post so far
don't let yourself be talked into anything, you'll get the few marks you lost back with no Deposit anyway.
you're smarter than the others think
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Liked this post:
Langhans_innen,
Olli_Eule
You're simply asking the wrong question and I think that shows once again that you grossly underestimate the luck factor in betting...
A 7s combination with odds between 1.7 and 2.00 or so has, let's say, odds of 100.
This means that the odds calculated by the bookie are probably around 1:110 and because of his margin/house edge he only gives you 100 times instead of 110 times if you win.
Even if you could assess games much better than the bookie and thus create a combination whose probability of winning is higher than calculated by the bookie, you may still be in a probability range of 1:90. And the assumption is already enormously generous in your favor.
Now you may have created a combination with value in your favor, because you would get 100 times as much again, although the probability is actually 1:90 and not 1:100.
Nevertheless, it is still very unlikely that the combo will hit. About 2.5 times less likely than hitting the exact number in roulette. And this already takes into account, as described above, that you have gotten the best possible, actually almost impossibly much, out of the bets through your analysis. And that's where your influence ends, the rest is luck. That's a mathematical fact and there's no point in talking yourself into making mistakes etc. It's also not a mistake in Roulette not to have bet on the 10 when it comes up, just because you thought about the 10 for a moment beforehand.
So yes, I think you and a few others here are the most likely to do it. Nevertheless, with the odds assumed above, which are roughly the same as your tickets, it will cost you on average! 90 to 100 attempts cost...
This post has been translated automatically
Sports betting tips 2025
Nobody has liked this post so far
AI says that a 6-player combination with odds between 1.67 and 2.30 has a win probability of 1.98 percent
This post has been translated automatically