Sport betting tips: Sports betting tips 2024 (Page 208)

Langhans_innen wrote on 03.08.2024 at 23:37:
because I would like to bet on odds that I can understand and that are fair and reasonable for me given the match situation. The bet is completely irrelevant. But you've already said it correctly: 1.80 no value, but 2.1 value. That's how it looked to me in the situation in question, which is why nothing came of the entry As a rule, I'm not in such a hurry and sometimes wait for a suitable opportunity.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

x00NY wrote on 04.08.2024 at 00:11: Was there actually a day in this Tournament without a rain interruption?

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen wrote on 04.08.2024 00:32:

I was just about to say "yes, but almost always late in the evening", which is of course nonsense, because it's in the afternoon It was really bad a few weeks ago in (I think, not 100% sure) s'Hertogenbosch. It felt like every match was interrupted twice I think Eastbourne was almost parallel and not much better off.

This post has been translated automatically

x00NY wrote on 04/08/2024 00:41:

Are always classic rain tournaments The worst is Wimbledon every year

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule wrote on 04/08/2024 00:00:

That's also a way to control his playing style. Wait for the best opportunity. Don't place too many bets.

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen wrote on 04.08.2024 at 10:28 am:
Yesterday's example also confirms this: Sabalenka - Bouzkova 4:6. 6:3, 3:6. The offered odds of around 1.8 for a shaky Sabalenka right at the beginning of the 2nd set simply didn't mean a good chance-risk ratio. You or I don't have to rush headlong into match situations that you're not convinced about. Then the entire bet is quickly gone and not just the decimal place of the odds is decisive. However, bookmakers are guaranteed to be happy about every customer who doesn't care about unrealistic odds discounts of 20% - they make a wonderful living from this in addition to their already existing house advantage

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen wrote on 04.08.2024 at 10:28 am:
Yesterday's example also confirms this: Sabalenka - Bouzkova 4:6. 6:3, 3:6. The offered odds of around 1.8 for a shaky Sabalenka right at the beginning of the 2nd set simply didn't mean a good chance-risk ratio. You or I don't have to rush headlong into match situations that you're not convinced of. Then the entire bet is quickly gone and not just the decimal place of the odds is decisive. However, bookmakers are guaranteed to be happy about every customer who doesn't care about unrealistic odds discounts of 20% - they make a wonderful living from this in addition to their already existing house advantage

This post has been translated automatically

x00NY wrote on 04.08.2024 at 10:48: Let's see if the Korean can really pull this thing



Edit by Julian: URL inserted correctly

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33 wrote on 04.08.2024 at 11:02 am:


that's exactly why my question was aimed at why 1.8 is not a value but 2.1 yes !

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen wrote on 04.08.2024 at 11:31 am:

the explanation has been there since last night and is not an analysis from this morning, which I made after the match: Sabalenka too weak at the time for my taste to take the total loss Risk of hitting just a 1.8 at the end. With a 2.1, the CRV would at least have changed enough for me to get in. This has nothing to do with a crystal ball, but is simply weighing up the risk and reward. Betting doesn't work without this and it doesn't matter whether the stake is €1 or €1,000. Whoever is more wrong than right makes a loss and the other makes a profit. That's my aim and not to give a possibly boring evening a thrill for the sake of it. Hundreds of matches and sporting events take place every day - there are often good opportunities and yesterday was not one of them, which proved to be the case afterwards. It's all very simple....at least in theory

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33 wrote on 04.08.2024 at 12:00:
So 15% decides for you whether you place a bet or not ?

The decisive factor was that you didn't have a good feeling about the Tip, no more or less!

That's why the 1.8 to 2.1 is just gobbledygook and based on nothing usable!
How do you determine the 0.3 quorum difference?

Sorry langhans, as in some of your posts, you're playing hard to get here and nothing more.

I'll try to ignore you, but I'm having a hard time with all this pomposity!

And the next error in reasoning, whoever is more wrong than right makes minus !
OMG !

This post has been translated automatically