Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Sport betting tips: Sports betting tips 2024 (Page 188)

Topic created on 01st Jan. 2024 | Page: 188 of 357 | Answers: 5,340 | Views: 225,235
x****Y

frapi07 wrote on 09.07.2024 21:03:

Too bad, but they really pulled it off. Only 3 games in 2 sets. She was completely lost. Was she the favorite?

Hats off to the bet. I've also played bets like that. Partly lost and partly won. So I can understand it, especially when such odds don't work out. But I'm not that awesome anymore (fortunately).

Yep, Navarro was also the bookmaker's favorite. I think the odds were around 1.53. The fact that she only won 3 games is really tough. First of all, she was immediately ahead with the break at 2:1, after which she only won one more game. Paolini changed quickly, and Navarro simply didn't have a plan B. She kept playing the same nonsense. At least the little combination went through


x00NY" alt="x00NY" title="x00NY" />

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite

x00NY wrote on 09.07.2024 21:32:

Yup, Navarro was also the favorite by the bookie. I think the odds were around 1.53. That she only wins 3 games is really hard. She was ahead with the break to 2:1, after that she only won one more game. Paolini changed quickly, and Navarro simply didn't have a plan B. Always played the same nonsense. At least the little combination went through


Olli_Eule" alt="Olli_Eule" title="Olli_Eule" />

luckily, I was worried that you might lose the 600 euro bet. It's a good thing you still had that little suit in your sleeve. phew. But France can still make it, nothing is decided. hmm

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite

x00NY wrote on 09.07.2024 21:32:

Yep, Navarro was also the favorite by the bookie. I think the odds were around 1.53. That she only wins 3 games is really hard. Especially when she was 2:1 up with the break, after that she only won one more game. Paolini changed quickly and Navarro simply didn't have a plan B. Always played the same nonsense. At least the little combination went through


frapi07" alt="frapi07" title="frapi07" />

At least you didn't make a minus, but it seems to be a frustration (because of the time).

It's awesome that the American got ripped off like that, but Sinner also lost today and he was the favorite. I could never bet on tennis

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite
frapi07 wrote on 09.07.2024 21:42:

At least you didn't make a minus, seems like a frustration bill though (because of the time).

That the American was ripped off like that is really awesome, but Sinner also lost today and he was also the favorite. I could never bet on tennis

i also find these set bets really difficult, wins 2 to 0 or 3 to 0 in tennis. That wouldn't be for me.
And while we're at it, basketball handicap minus 5.5 or handball handicap minus 5.5 or something like that, no thanks

This post has been translated automatically

x****Y

Olli_Eule wrote on 09.07.2024 21:41:

fortunately, I was already worried that you might now lose the 600 euro bet. Good thing you still had that little combo in your sleeve. phew. But France can still make it, nothing is decided. hmm

It was only 400€ from me, the remaining 200€ was a Deposit bonus from betano. Nothing can go wrong in this bet, and the other one is already dead


@frapi

The bet was created with a small portion of frustration. I only wanted to play Hz over 1, but the frustration meant that the cricket bet had to be included. Now you can watch the game in peace

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite

Olli_Eule wrote on 09.07.2024 at 21:43:
exactly I also find these set bets really hard, wins 2 to 0 or 3 to 0 in tennis. That wouldn't be for me now.
And while we're at it, basketball handicap minus 5.5 or handball handicap minus 5.5 or something like that, no thanks

That only makes sense if one of the top rankings is playing against someone much lower (who is ranked 50 or so). If you look at Sinner for example, he beat a few opponents before that by 0.

It's the same with basketball betting. There are games where you know that team X is very likely to win. The odds for victory are correspondingly low (1.2 or so). Many win not only with a difference of 1-2 baskets, but significantly more. You just have to know when it could be the case

x00NY wrote on 09.07.2024 at 21:47:

Was only 400€ from me, the remaining 200€ was a Deposit bonus from betano. nothing can go wrong in the bet, and the other one is already dead


@frapi

The bet was created with a small portion of frustration. I only wanted to play Hz over 1, but the frustration meant that the cricket bet had to be included. Now you can watch the game in peace

Yes, you can see that from the time. I would generally advise against it, it can also go wrong. My experience tells me that if you lose, you should take it more calmly (but more safely). With my last big win (not in the sports betting area) I also bet 1k out of frustration. It could have gone wrong, especially when you know how volatile the slots are.

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite
so first game of my Betano mission is over with Spain, now Holland still has to win

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert

Langhans wrote on 09.07.2024 at 21:27:

Fine, the courage is obviously rewarded I wouldn't have had that..even a +2.5 wouldn't have seemed plausible to me

Sports betting is sometimes cruel ....so I'm not giving anything new away

This post has been translated automatically

Dutch78
Expert

Langhans wrote on 09.07.2024 at 22:59:

Sports betting is sometimes cruel ....so I'm not giving anything new away

Indeed But had bet a little bit on under 3.5 goals, so that at least a small plus came out of it.

But I also expected France to exert even more pressure towards the end of the game than they did.
I also noticed that time-wasting is somehow rewarded, at least it doesn't play a major role in the scoring. It's a subjective impression, of course, but I've also noticed it in other games.

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert

Dutch78 wrote on 09.07.2024 at 23:08:

Indeed But had bet a little bit on under 3.5 goals, so at least there was a small plus.

But I was also expecting France to put on even more pressure towards the end of the game than they did.
I also noticed that time-wasting is somehow rewarded, at least it doesn't play a major role in the scoring. It's a subjective impression, of course, but I've also noticed it in other games.

To be honest, I only took a rudimentary look because I hadn't bet myself, but I didn't notice an unconditional run at the end either. Of course, arbitrage is always an effective way of avoiding screens or other hardware sailing off the balcony and having a mostly relaxed evening of soccer

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite

Dutch78 wrote on 09.07.2024 at 23:08:
I also noticed that time play is somehow rewarded, at least it doesn't play a big part in the scoring. This is of course a subjective impression, but I've also noticed it in other games.

That's why I was really happy that the referee at Croatia-Italy gave +8 minutes. Time was supposed to be punished, not rewarded. I can understand that it's part of the tactic, but you saw when France went 0-1 down that even injuries are feigned so early (Rabiot). They do that to interrupt the flow of the game and make it less hectic.

In general, however, there were few interruptions, hardly any fouls/yellow cards (2 cards per team, even though all cards are canceled from the semi-final onwards) and no VAR. There was only one speedster and a few "injuries" and even then +5 was given and even that is still too little and some people complained about Croatia-Italy saying that 8 minutes was too much.

This post has been translated automatically

Supernatural
Rookie
In Croatia-Italy there was no timeout worth mentioning, not at all (if you watched the game with a minimum IQ). There was no rational reason for 8 minutes. The Dutch referee (he really is homosexual) who whistled the game is in a relationship with an Italian. As you can see, it wasn't entirely clean.

For the ignorant here: Before the Turin match, UEFA agreed not to give "World Cup Qatar injury time", but to use the CL standard. That means a normal 3-5 minutes, as was rightly done until the Croatia-Italy game. The 8 minutes were completely excessive by these standards, which is why the Dutch referee was rightly sent home. Rules are rules. The decision was made to take the CL route, which should be followed.

This post has been translated automatically

Supernatural
Rookie
I'm pleased that Spain have progressed. Good soccer should always be rewarded and less of the cereals like France and also Germany (see Kroos' broken kick from Pedri). I'm always happy when soccer wins and not kicking around. Congratulations to Spain for advancing.

This post has been translated automatically

Supernatural
Rookie
Oh yes, and embarrassing German fans booing Cucurella. What's the player's fault? xD Whistle the referee. We Germans should stop this victim behavior. It's embarrassing. It's not getting any better in soccer.

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite

Supernatural wrote on 10.07.2024 at 00:17: In Croatia-Italy there was no timeout to speak of, not at all(if you watched the game with a minimum IQ). There was no rational reason for 8 minutes. The Dutch referee (he really is homosexual) who whistled the game is in a relationship with an Italian. As you can see, it wasn't entirely clean.

For the ignorant here: Before the Turin match, UEFA agreed not to give "World Cup Qatar injury time", but to use the CL standard. That means a normal 3-5 minutes, as was rightly done until the Croatia-Italy game. The 8 minutes were completely excessive by these standards, which is why the Dutch referee was rightly sent home. Rules are rules. The decision was made to take the CL route, which should be followed.


It all happened in the 2nd half:

- Var review for a handball penalty. The referee didn't immediately run to the screen, but a minute or so later.

- The goal was cheered for more than a minute and it took that long for the ball to roll again.

- 5 Croatian players got a yellow card (for fouls or timeouts - e.g. Ivanusec kicked the ball away in the 73rd minute and got a yellow card for it). All these stoppages happened before stoppage time, 2 Italians got yellow cards in stoppage time (Calafiori and Fagioli).

- The Croatians made 3 substitutions before stoppage time. Of course that counts as an interruption and should be replayed. Just as a comparison: the Spaniards, for example, didn't make all their changes before stoppage time today and there was one more change in injury time.

These are all interruptions. That's a fact and there's no need to discuss it any further. If you want to discuss, then please do so with facts, otherwise you can spare yourself the posts. They are not objective. I'm certainly not a Germany fan, but accusing Nagelsmann of doing a bad job is simply unfair and subjective. You're welcome to dislike the guy, but objectively speaking, he did a good job at Euro 2024.

I also think we can agree that there should be a minimum number of minutes added on. You usually see this in extra time, which is 1 minute (if a team is behind, it's often 2 minutes). In other words, there are AT LEAST 2 minutes added on (as in Italy-Switzerland) and if there were other interruptions, then that is added on. There is no maximum. Yes, the CL was taken as a benchmark, but it is only a benchmark. The fact that the referee was sent home doesn't mean anything. There are fewer games in the knockout phase and you don't need as many referees and apparently there were referees who were more convincing. But I doubt that he was sent home because of the stoppage time (as a punishment).

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 05:32 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately