Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Sport betting tips: Sports betting tips 2023 (Page 292)

Topic created on 01st Jan. 2023 | Page: 292 of 684 | Answers: 6,838 | Views: 592,850
Bluff
Expert
Yes must now also say after I have seen it again clear penalty

This post has been translated automatically

Xavi22
Expert

Wutmaennchen wrote on 03.05.2023 at 22:54:

And in the other one you saw that it was not so. And the ref got that one too.

So extra still waiting for the interviews and actually have to agree with you. It was a wrong decision in the end. Stuttgart not on the ball. Awesome that you give the ref such a crappy attitude. Unbelievable. The ref I can understand, his attitude was unfortunately the worst to choose.

This post has been translated automatically

Xavi22
Expert
But I would like to say again that I would have decided the same as the referee with his slow motion. Here, the VAR has once again built bullshit.

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon
Glasner Frankfurt coach has just watched the penalty and found that the Frankfurt were lucky that the referee did not give the penalty.

This post has been translated automatically

Bluff
Expert
Yes, I'm with you, the pictures that the referee has seen I would have also decided so but with the others I would have given safe Elmeter.

This post has been translated automatically

Butterbrezel
Elite
This VAR is just ridiculous.

Sometimes they do not intervene in such clear things like Dortmund. Then they show the referee the worst possible perspective, although the right is certainly present.

The question I ask myself: Why?

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
The VAR should make everything better but in the end it just doesn't do anything. Even with the VAR wrong decisions are made as it was before. Then they should abolish it again and label it as a failure. Simply embarrassing!

This post has been translated automatically

Bluff
Expert

Patizi wrote on 03.05.2023 at 23:18: The VAR should make everything better but in the end it just does nothing. Even with the VAR wrong decisions are made as it was before. Then they should abolish it again and label it as a failure. Simply embarrassing!

I see the same simply abolish the crap again.



By the way a livetipp I play Magreb - Casablanca Dreher 4.5 quote

This post has been translated automatically

slotliebe89
Elite
In this context, I find fault with the far too few camera angles that the referee gets to see or that exist in general.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Patizi wrote on 03.05.2023 at 23:18: The VAR should make everything better but in the end it just does nothing. Even with the VAR wrong decisions are made as it was before. Then they should abolish it again and label it as a failure. Simply just embarrassing!

"According to this, the VAR intervened justifiably in 96 percent of all cases in the 63 Bundesliga games played so far. However, Drees criticized on Wednesday that twice was not intervened where it would have been necessary. According to Drees, 26 wrong decisions were prevented by the video evidence. On average, the review of a scene now takes only 69 seconds, compared to 81 seconds last season."


https://www.kicker.de/var-verhindert-26-fehlentscheidungen-und-liegt-einmal-falsch-874698/artikel

Comes from 2021, but that's not such a bad record now, is it?
I can already hear the whiners when the VAR is removed: "With VAR this would not have happened now"

My attitude to the VAR is still totally anti, because it just killed the atmosphere. "Should I cheer already or not?" This stupid feeling during the waiting always, that totally annoys everything. The flow is totally lost in parts.

But it should be fairer with a more sophisticated VAR system in any case. You just have to prioritize what's more important to you.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics8th Nov. 2024 at 12:46 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately