Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Sport betting tips: Sports betting tips 2022 (Page 23)

Topic created on 02nd Jan. 2022 | Page: 23 of 796 | Answers: 7,957 | Views: 992,055
Anonym
13337 wrote on 17/01/2022 at 00:16
I play 3 underdogs as single bets.

1. Gojowczyk @3.05
2. Kenin @2.60
3. Martic @2.85

Of those, 2 out of 3 should go through, which would be a nice plus

I'm surprised by the odds on Martic. I'll take that one. I rate her significantly stronger than Teichmann. The Gojowczyk also has a good rate..Thanks

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Sakkari with many mistakes. Therefore I bet 20€ on Maria. 15.8 odds

This post has been translated automatically

B****3
Royal777 wrote on 01/16/2022 at 3:20 PM
???So I have been watching the trial all night.
According to the court there was no false information, this was a lie from the press as well as misinformation from the immigration department. Alex Hawke denied the lie in today's trial, instead his claims were based on information he had from the press. He apologized to Djokovic for this.

Djokovic's renewed application was rejected because of possible internal unrest in Australia. Other unvaccinated are allowed to participate, of course, because they are unknown to the general public. Everything else can be read in the blog

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-01-16/novak-djokovic-live-updates-visa-cancellation-court-hearing/100758964

"The minister clearly sees that there is a Risk that, in the same way as Mr Djokovic advertises or associates himself with a whole range of products
"The known facts ... the knowledge of his perceived views and historical views and his unanswered views in combination with his status and presence could be seen to contribute to those issues." "


Unfortunately, this does not correspond to the whole truth, the justification is still to be delivered later, and that he has made untrue statements with the entry or his team, he has admitted himself

And since you yourself are unvaccinated, of course the solidarity with djokovic explains itself, but nevertheless I remain with my opinion

A person who has been infected with covid knowingly, then hugs small children and gives an interview, acts irresponsibly and risks children's lives and or human lives

There is no excuse for such a thing and it is a danger for the general public

It makes already something the appearance that you probably rather the querdenkerszene belong, therefore do not surprise me meanwhile your completely confused comments. For lateral thinkers I feel anyway only disgust and disrespect

This post has been translated automatically

Butterbrezel
Elite
Blubbo33 wrote on 17.01.2022 at 08:48
Unfortunately, this does not correspond to the whole truth, the reason is to be delivered still later, and that he has made untrue statements with the entry or his team, he has admitted himself

And since you yourself are unvaccinated, of course the solidarity with djokovic explains itself, but nevertheless I remain with my opinion

A person who has been infected with covid knowingly, then hugs small children and gives an interview, acts irresponsibly and risks children's lives and or human lives

There is no excuse for such a thing and it is a danger for the general public

It makes already something the appearance that you probably rather the querdenkerszene belong, therefore do not surprise me meanwhile your completely confused comments. For lateral thinkers I feel anyway only disgust and disrespect.

Even if this is off-topic, this cannot be avoided in the current time. So I ask the moderators of GJ that this hopefully factual discussion be allowed.

Your comment for "disgust and disrespect" lacks objectivity.

I think the djoker is awesome. He didn't follow rules. We don't know the reasons why.
If he doesn't trust the "vaccines" currently available, I can understand it.
If he denies the virus, I can't understand it.
We don't know, and it doesn't matter.
He lost with his plan against the country of Australia, done.

Now the off-topic:

Please describe who you define as a "contrarian".

Are you aware that this word was created by the media alone?

Let's take an example: me.

I had now probably the 2nd time Corona. 1 x, current, proven, the first time I was sick with flu.
The first time, in February 2020, was not yet tested for Corona. Although, as subsequently known, the virus was there yes long ago (because it broke out in November 2019 / December 2019) in China.
The symptoms at that time strongly matched Corona, it was really a strong flu.

Now at the beginning of January 2022 I was infected with the Delta variant. 3 days of mild flu symptoms, then it was over again.
To be on the safe side, I had myself tested anyway. Quick test negative. But I had the feeling that it could be Corona.
Despite the negative rapid test, I had a PCR test done by our doctor.
Result: PCR test positive, delta variant.
So much for the quick tests. If I had trusted them, I would have been walking around for 10 days and could have infected mankind.
So I quarantined myself and followed the instructions.

3 days of mild flu symptoms although an infection is proven.
This indicates ANTI-BODY, which confirms my opinion that I already had Corona in February 2020.

Now the recovery status WITHOUT ANY MEDICAL background was reduced to 3 months. Alone 6 months was not medically justifiable, because the antibodies can still be sufficient after YEARS to defeat an infection and thus have a mild course. Any doctor can confirm this

And the current reduction to 3 months has even less than 0.00% medical background.

The vaccine of Astra, Biontech and Moderna has demonstrably, see the safety reports of the PEI and the reports of the RKI so many deadly or severe side effects as no vaccine in history before.
There are more vaccine breakthroughs than ever before.

The currently available vaccine is simply not a vaccine. It does not prevent the spread of the virus, it only prevents potentially severe courses to a certain percentage. Again, this is offset by the deadly and severe side effects. This vaccine simply does not have an appropriate benefit/risk value when measured on the entire population.
It is an experiment.

The Corona issue is no longer, or never has been, about people's health. It is about pharma money.
Otherwise, as in Russia, for example, antibody tests would be accepted as proof of recovery.
I have contacts in Russia, so I know that this is so.

I am recovered until May 2022 according to the new regulation, although I can be protected from the virus for years.

I do not deny the virus, it exists, I noticed myself 2 times. I question the decisions of the government for reasons mentioned above, among others.

I think with, not as the media say "across". If my doctor recommends me to boost myself in May 2022 with a then hopefully available dead vaccine, I will do that too. If he thinks it is not necessary because of the antibody test, which I will pay for myself, I will not do it

Biontech and Moderna will not enter my body under any circumstances.

Am I for you a "lateral thinker" for whom you only feel disgust and disrespect?

This post has been translated automatically

Xavi22
Expert
Wutmaennchen wrote on 17.01.2022 at 19:04
Even though this is off-topic, it can't be avoided in the current times. So I ask the moderators of GJ that this hopefully factual discussion be allowed.

Your comment for "disgust and disrespect" lacks objectivity.

I think the djoker is awesome. He didn't follow rules. We don't know the reasons why.
If he doesn't trust the "vaccines" currently available, I can understand it.
If he denies the virus, I can't understand it.
We don't know, and it doesn't matter.
He lost with his plan against the country of Australia, done.

Now the off-topic:

Please describe who you define as a "contrarian".

Are you aware that this word was created by the media alone?

Let's take an example: me.

I had now probably the 2nd time Corona. 1 x, current, proven, the first time I was sick with flu.
The first time, in February 2020, was not yet tested for Corona. Although, as subsequently known, the virus was there yes long ago (because it broke out in November 2019 / December 2019) in China.
The symptoms at that time strongly matched Corona, it was really a strong flu.

Now at the beginning of January 2022 I was infected with the Delta variant. 3 days of mild flu symptoms, then it was over again.
To be on the safe side, I had myself tested anyway. Quick test negative. But I had the feeling that it could be Corona.
Despite the negative rapid test, I had a PCR test done by our doctor.
Result: PCR test positive, delta variant.
So much for the quick tests. If I had trusted them, I would have been walking around for 10 days and could have infected mankind.
So I quarantined myself and followed the instructions.

3 days of mild flu symptoms although an infection is proven.
This indicates ANTI-BODY, which confirms my opinion that I already had Corona in February 2020.

Now the recovery status WITHOUT ANY MEDICAL background was reduced to 3 months. Alone 6 months was not medically justifiable, because the antibodies can still be sufficient after YEARS to defeat an infection and thus have a mild course. Any doctor can confirm this

And the current reduction to 3 months has even less than 0.00% medical background.

The vaccine of Astra, Biontech and Moderna has demonstrably, see the safety reports of the PEI and the reports of the RKI so many deadly or severe side effects as no vaccine in history before.
There are more vaccine breakthroughs than ever before.

The currently available vaccine is simply not a vaccine. It does not prevent the spread of the virus, it only prevents potentially severe courses to a certain percentage. Again, this is offset by the deadly and severe side effects. This vaccine simply does not have an appropriate benefit/risk value when measured on the entire population.
It is an experiment.

The Corona issue is no longer, or never has been, about people's health. It is about pharma money.
Otherwise, as in Russia, for example, antibody tests would be accepted as proof of recovery.
I have contacts in Russia, so I know that this is so.

I am recovered until May 2022 according to the new regulation, although I can be protected from the virus for years.

I do not deny the virus, it exists, I noticed myself 2 times. I question the decisions of the government for reasons mentioned above, among others.

I think with, not as the media say "across". If my doctor recommends me to boost myself in May 2022 with a then hopefully available dead vaccine, I will do that too. If he thinks it is not necessary because of the antibody test, which I will pay for myself, I will not do it

Biontech and Moderna will not enter my body under any circumstances.

Am I for you a "lateral thinker" for whom you only feel disgust and disrespect?

I would like to say a few words about your contribution.

First: I think it's basically good that you stand up for your opinion, your values and Co. However, I would like to clarify a few things a little.

Regarding your statement about the shortening of the convalescent status to 3 months:
Fact is simply that both the 6-month status and the current 3-month status are based on 0.00% medical backrgound, because there are simply too few to no long-term studies on this. There are people who have little or no antibodies after a short period of time, whereas others have them over a longer period of time. So even a recovery status of 5 days should not be a complaint

Regarding your point about vaccine reactions and breakthroughs: I took the trouble to look at a report from the PEI
It is this one https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/newsroom/dossiers/sicherheitsberichte/sicherheitsbericht-27-12-bis-30-06-21.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3

In the first half of 2021, there were 74,871,502 vaccinations, with 106,835 reported cases of vaccine reactions and 10,578 cases of severe vaccine reactions. Unfortunately, it is a bit more difficult to get the numbers of adverse reactions to influenza vaccinations (if someone has something, please post a link), but it is said that about 10 to 25 percent of the people have vaccination reactions, but severe reactions probably occur only 1 time in one million vaccinations.

As comparison: With the flu inoculation there are with 74,871,502 inoculations on the average about 10,000,000 inoculation reactions, but only 100 heavy reactions. The dark figure with flu vaccinations I estimate however quite as higher, since one brings in the last 1.5 years really everything with Corona in connection, in the past however not surely everything with the flu vaccination.

De facto you are right, that the Risk for a severe vaccination reaction is higher with the Corona vaccinations than for example with the flu. But is it as high as you describe? For a vaccine that was produced on such short notice and on an emergency basis? And you're also forgetting the reward of that vaccination. The vaccinated people keep the regular business running. If everyone saw it the way you do, a "normal" life would probably be unthinkable. And I don't mean that much would have changed in your case. You seem to have survived Corona twice. Your neighbor, supermarket employee or kindergarten teacher, however, may not have. And you don't talk about the side effects after a Corona infection either. There are no meaningful studies on that either, which is why I don't want to philosophize, but we're not likely to see better numbers than vaccine breakthroughs in infected people in ten or 15 years.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Xavi22 wrote on 17/01/2022 at 20:11
(..)

I like that you argue factually and are also willing to read the information we linked. I will certainly answer in the chat corner!
But for now, I'd like to get back on topic here before a new discussion flares up here.

So... My yesterday's bets were a bust Nevertheless, I was able to limit my loss through some live bets.

Today the following is on:

Begu - Dodin
Kvitova - Cirstea
Stosur - Anderson
Gasquet - Humbert
Kolhi - Cecchinato
Vögele - Kasatkina

Quote 157

Vögele - Kasatkina
Konjuh - Rogers
Basilashvilli - A.Murray

Quote 32

Vögele - Kasatkina
Cressey - Isner
Watson - Sherif
Goffin - Evans

Quote 76

There will also be a few live bets on Vögele and depending on what Eurosport will broadcast. Bet in each case 10-20€

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Royal777 wrote on 18/01/2022 at 00:39 PM

Begu - Dodin
Kvitova - Cirstea
Stosur - Anderson
Gasquet - Humbert
Kolhi - Cecchinato
Vögele - Kasatkina

Quote 157


Very annoying, unfortunately Vögele lost clearly, just like Kvitova. While the outsiders Kohlschreiber, Stosur, Begu and Gasquet won. One knows...

This post has been translated automatically

x****Y
Royal777 wrote on 18.01.2022 at 05:05
Very annoying, unfortunately Vögele lost clearly, just like Kvitova. While the outsiders Kohlschreiber, Stosur, Begu and Gasquet won. You know...

Outsiders Kohlschreiber, Stosur and begu??? He was the clear favorite, both with the bookmakers (1.44) and the experts. Stosur was a 50/50match, but also not an outsider... Begu was also the favorite in the match against dodin (1.44)

This post has been translated automatically

mightymike
Top Member
Royal777 wrote on 18.01.2022 at 05:05
Very annoying, unfortunately Vögele lost clearly, just like Kvitova. While the outsiders Kohlschreiber, Stosur, Begu and Gasquet won. You know...

I don't know much about tennis, but it seems to be like football:

You can't rely on anything anymore.

I avoid it in the meantime to have 1 game several times in different combination bets,
no matter how promising. Often enough happens that just this game shreds me several combos.


I now usually put several single bets on outsiders.
Comes mostly at least one, often several through, the odds are then correspondingly good.

Incidentally, the head plays an increasingly important role, who better puts away all the accompanying circumstances.

This post has been translated automatically

Gerstosteron
Amateur
Don't understand at all how you can burn your money like this.

Why do you put Vögele in each of your combined bets? Kasatkina has been in great form, beaten Mertens, kenin and muguruza in preparation. Vögele lost to papamichail (181st world) straight up in 2

So I don't want to attack, but I would be interested to know on which analysis you put Vögele in each of your combos

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Nov. 2024 at 05:33 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately