frapi07 wrote on 03.05.2024 at 11:33 am:
Yes, of course it's eig. about tips can give. But you can do the same in the sports betting thread. It was done that way before.
I would have gone for PSG, by the way. I could have easily imagined PSG leading by 2 goals in the course of the game. I think someone (no idea who it was - sorry) once said that PSG have always scored at least once in the last 38 out of 39 games. So 1/39 that they don't score. Then there's the fact that Betano has this 2-goal lead and that would have been a plausible Tip in itself.
We all know that reality is always different. But from that point of view, my tip would have been plausible.
Yes, that was me who said that😄
For me, this statistic was more of an indication of both...
But I basically understand what you mean.
In addition, of course, the odds on such popular tips often fall and in the end, if you want to retype, there is only a 1.5 or so...
Therefore, my recommendation would really be to reward the overall success over 10 or 20 tips or a period of time.
For me, this statistic was just more of an indication of both hitting...
But I basically understand what you mean.
In addition, of course, the odds on such popular tips often still fall and in the end, if you want to retype, there is only a 1.5 or so...
Therefore, my recommendation would really be to also reward the overall success over 10 or 20 tips or a period of time.
Yes, I wasn't sure if that was you
Right, you often place the tips days before and then the odds go down (usually).
Stromberg wrote on 03.05.2024 at 12:22: Since things are going badly for me at the moment anyway, I'm going to give you a Tip with high odds for tomorrow 😄
Stromberg wrote on 03.05.2024 at 11:14 a.m.: I think that since activity is very high at the moment, the entire area needs to be better organized.
For me, this includes:
1. A filter option. By author and ideally also sport, bet types, possibly odds.
2. An overview of how successful the authors bet. That after 10 bets have been placed, the theoretical win or loss is displayed when all these tips are replayed (with the same bet, of course).
At least it would be nice to be able to see the tips in the user's profile to start with.
I just wanted to evaluate my hit rate and had to scroll through all the pages...
That would make point 3 possible:
You could still reward 3 successful tips in a row, if necessary then only with €10.
And then after every 10 or 15 tips or so, for example, evaluate the overall success and reward a win.
This would possibly tackle the "problem" mentioned by Frapi that people tend to go for the lower odds and place them as tips instead of the higher odds that have value.
frapi07 wrote on 03.05.2024 at 10:45 am:
I'll try to explain this to you using 2 examples of what the current rules lead to.
Example 1:
I'm deliberately picking a game this week. BVB-PSG. Both had roughly the same odds. Was about 2.5.
Nobody bet on the winner - simply because it's unnecessarily risky. You Risk your winning streak and get no added value from it.
Instead, bets such as "both score / over 2.5" are taken because they have lower odds and are more likely to work out.
The number of winning bets is extremely low.
Example 2:
Let's assume you have a feeling that Bayern will lose against Wolfsburg. You won't take the Tip as a community tip because it simply doesn't make sense. I just think it's a shame because - with the right analysis - it might encourage one or two people to bet on it.
Yes, but that certainly reflects people's general betting behavior. Out of 1000 people, the majority are guaranteed to have bet on both scoring or on Über, goals can always happen somehow and you're simply not dependent on who wins, even in the case of Bayern against Bochum, hardly anyone goes for a normal Bayern win. They play high handicaps, go for umpteen goals or both score. Is a home win for Dortmund more unrealistic than both teams scoring against Bochum? I don't know. I think the odds are also extremely blinding.
In general, I don't think many people here read what you write about the games. Let that be 10 people at most. There are hardly ever any reactions to the tips. I see it as a chance to make a few coins on the side and that's that.
Yes but that certainly reflects people's general betting behavior. Out of 1000 people, the majority are guaranteed to score on both or on Über.goals can always happen somehow and you're just not dependent on who wins.even with Bayern against Bochum, hardly anyone goes for Bayern's normal win. They play high handicaps, go for umpteen goals or both score. Is a home win for Dortmund more unrealistic than both teams scoring against Bochum? I don't know. I think the odds are also extremely blinding.
In general, I don't think many people here read what you write about the games. Let that be 10 people at most. There are hardly ever any reactions to the tips. I see it as a chance to make a few coins on the side and that's that.
Yes, I only bet on goals in my private life... So those are the tips I come up with for the site.
I would be interested to know who, apart from the authors perhaps, actually plays these individual tips with mini odds.
Who in the community is even interested in this area and reads the analyses?
Maybe that would be something for a GJ survey.
I, for example, read through the first analyses at the beginning, but then quickly lost interest.
It would be different with 2-3 player combos, where you at least reach a quota of 3 or more, and no huge analysis would be necessary.
I would also find combos like Rainmann or Olli the Owl with ice hockey or basketball interesting.
MisterL wrote on 03.05.2024 at 15:33: dat is like inside politics good ideas are talked about until only hype comes out, subsidies that make no sense and only
benefit only a few.
i want you to open the thread and see a Tip that is well explained, that has been well discussed, that you can make up your own mind, a
a reasonably good quote (swarm intelligence) and then go to the broker after reading for a few minutes and then submit the tip.
and not a long text from 3 people for 1 game with 1.6 odds over several days, sometimes the same game, where you can see that it's all about that
safe to bag his 20 euros
Yes, basically it's just about pocketing the money and the authors are allowed to do so, why not if GJ offers it that way?
But I don't see any added value for the community here.
Nobody plays single bets with odds of 1.7.
Yes, basically it's just about bagging the obolus and the authors are allowed to do so, why not if GJ offers it that way?
But I don't see any added value for the community here.
Nobody plays single bets with odds of 1.7.
Of course there are people who play odds of 1.7. Have you still not realized that people should be introduced to sports betting? That's what this is for, just like a betting game, etc. But by now people should have understood what sports betting is. It's just like playing slots in a casino, just another form of gambling
MisterL wrote on 03.05.2024 at 15:33: dat is like inside politics good ideas are talked about until only hype comes out, subsidies that make no sense and only
benefit only a few.
i want you to open the thread and see a Tip that is well explained, that has been well discussed, that you can make up your own mind about, a
a reasonably good quote (swarm intelligence) and then go to the broker after reading for a few minutes and then submit the tip.
and not a long text from 3 people for 1 game with 1.6 odds over several days, sometimes the same game, where you can see that it's all about that
safe to bag his 20 euros
ok, fortunately we don't have that here. Texts are all read in a minute and there are no duplicate tips. The reasonably good odds are just the thing. What are reasonably good odds? You can't say that across the board because everyone feels differently. 1.38 to Düsseldorf, for example. With 10 euros 13.80 back. With 100 euros 138.80 back. With 1000 euros bet just 1380. My assessment, for 10 euros not good odds. For 1000 euros, great odds.
Lionking wrote on 03.05.2024 at 15:42: I'd be interested to know who, apart from the authors perhaps, even plays these individual tips with mini odds.
Who in the community is even interested in this area and reads the analyses?
Maybe that would be something for a GJ survey.
I, for example, read through the first analyses at the beginning, but then quickly lost interest.
It would be different with 2-3 player combos, where you at least reach a quota of 3 or more, there would be no need for a huge analysis.
I would also find combos like Rainmann or Olli the Owl with ice hockey or basketball interesting.
But it wouldn't be too much to ask to form your own combination of e.g. rainmann and olli's tips.
The fact that individual betting tips are not interesting can, I think, be ruled out due to the many sites that present them. It doesn't matter whether you play them individually or as a combination or as a supplement in your own combination.
How interesting the whole thing is for the GJ community would also interest me. To be honest, I'm not just writing the tips to force a compulsion, but I hope someone is interested too😄
Lionking wrote on 03.05.2024 at 15:42: I'd be interested to know who, apart from the authors perhaps, even plays these individual tips with mini odds.
Who in the community is even interested in this area and reads the analyses?
Maybe that would be something for a GJ survey.
I, for example, read through the first analyses at the beginning, but then quickly lost interest.
It would be different with 2-3 player combos, where you at least reach a quota of 3 or more, there would be no need for a huge analysis.
I would also find combos like Rainmann or Olli the Owl with ice hockey or basketball interesting.
You can see the participation in the sports betting thread. If there's nothing, hardly anyone writes in. Probably just 10 people when things get tough. Probably 5-6 on a regular basis, but if there's something to be won or a win, several people write in at once. So you can see that it's important to give something in return (e.g. the 20 euros for 3 correct tips) if you want to get people involved. People would prefer not to put in any effort, along the lines of "Bayern-Bochum win 1". You can put a little effort into it.
But it wouldn't be too much to ask now to form your own combination of e.g. rainmann and olli's tips.
The fact that individual betting tips are not interesting can be ruled out due to the many sites that present them. It doesn't matter whether you play them individually or as a combination or as a supplement in your own combination.
How interesting the whole thing is for the GJ community would also interest me. To be honest, I'm not just writing the tips to force a compulsion, but I hope someone is interested too😄
You can see how much interest there is in your tips from the comments and the clicks you can leave. My first thought was that it might interest one or the other but I quickly discarded that idea because I can see how many people are clicking on something 😂
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, that was me who said that😄
For me, this statistic was more of an indication of both...
But I basically understand what you mean.
In addition, of course, the odds on such popular tips often fall and in the end, if you want to retype, there is only a 1.5 or so...
Therefore, my recommendation would really be to reward the overall success over 10 or 20 tips or a period of time.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, I wasn't sure if that was you
Right, you often place the tips days before and then the odds go down (usually).
Good luck
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
😂😂 Nope. It would be nice. But 6 series makes me proud 🤙🤙😃
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, but that certainly reflects people's general betting behavior. Out of 1000 people, the majority are guaranteed to have bet on both scoring or on Über, goals can always happen somehow and you're simply not dependent on who wins, even in the case of Bayern against Bochum, hardly anyone goes for a normal Bayern win. They play high handicaps, go for umpteen goals or both score. Is a home win for Dortmund more unrealistic than both teams scoring against Bochum? I don't know. I think the odds are also extremely blinding.
In general, I don't think many people here read what you write about the games. Let that be 10 people at most. There are hardly ever any reactions to the tips. I see it as a chance to make a few coins on the side and that's that.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Liked this post: Patizi
Yes, I only bet on goals in my private life... So those are the tips I come up with for the site.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, that's exactly what I mean. I think that's the case for most people. All the bills you see revolve around Über and G-G.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Liked this post: B****3
benefit only a few.
i want you to open the thread and see a Tip that is well explained, that has been well discussed, that you can make up your own mind about, a
a reasonably good quote (swarm intelligence) and then go to the broker after reading for a few minutes and then submit the tip.
and not a long text from 3 people for 1 game with 1.6 odds over several days, sometimes the same game, where you can see that it's all about that
safe to pocket his 20 euros
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Who in the community is even interested in this area and reads the analyses?
Maybe that would be something for a GJ survey.
I, for example, read through the first analyses at the beginning, but then quickly lost interest.
It would be different with 2-3 player combos, where you at least reach a quota of 3 or more, and no huge analysis would be necessary.
I would also find combos like Rainmann or Olli the Owl with ice hockey or basketball interesting.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Liked this post: Nik89
Yes, basically it's just about pocketing the money and the authors are allowed to do so, why not if GJ offers it that way?
But I don't see any added value for the community here.
Nobody plays single bets with odds of 1.7.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Of course there are people who play odds of 1.7. Have you still not realized that people should be introduced to sports betting? That's what this is for, just like a betting game, etc. But by now people should have understood what sports betting is. It's just like playing slots in a casino, just another form of gambling
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Liked this post: Dr-Strange
ok, fortunately we don't have that here. Texts are all read in a minute and there are no duplicate tips. The reasonably good odds are just the thing. What are reasonably good odds? You can't say that across the board because everyone feels differently. 1.38 to Düsseldorf, for example. With 10 euros 13.80 back. With 100 euros 138.80 back. With 1000 euros bet just 1380. My assessment, for 10 euros not good odds. For 1000 euros, great odds.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
But it wouldn't be too much to ask to form your own combination of e.g. rainmann and olli's tips.
The fact that individual betting tips are not interesting can, I think, be ruled out due to the many sites that present them. It doesn't matter whether you play them individually or as a combination or as a supplement in your own combination.
How interesting the whole thing is for the GJ community would also interest me. To be honest, I'm not just writing the tips to force a compulsion, but I hope someone is interested too😄
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
You can see the participation in the sports betting thread. If there's nothing, hardly anyone writes in. Probably just 10 people when things get tough. Probably 5-6 on a regular basis, but if there's something to be won or a win, several people write in at once. So you can see that it's important to give something in return (e.g. the 20 euros for 3 correct tips) if you want to get people involved. People would prefer not to put in any effort, along the lines of "Bayern-Bochum win 1". You can put a little effort into it.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
You can see how much interest there is in your tips from the comments and the clicks you can leave. My first thought was that it might interest one or the other but I quickly discarded that idea because I can see how many people are clicking on something 😂
This post has been translated automatically