Sport betting tips: Community betting tips (Page 12)

MisterL wrote on 04.05.2024 at 05:43: take a look on saturday you just want to give a few tips for fun that preferably all take place at the same time but do not necessarily have to be.

20 depositor 4 tips a 5 euro and then also times ne quota 20+ hit, so nen hunni is already nice takes man with.

those who bet 1000 on a game are not the common people.

then 13:00 2liga takes a Tip then 3liga follows then 15:30 bundesliga

and I'd like it if someone like owl, for example, who has really got his head screwed on and has searched through all the games and picked his 5-6 combos

and then posts it here with small comments and everyone who adds what he might have overlooked...

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi wrote on 06.05.2024 at 06:44:

You said that you can't take long term stats and you only find the last 2-3 games interesting. Then you should know that before the game yesterday Dybala scored 1 time and Lukaku too. As far as the last 3 games are concerned. Yesterday, by the way, Lukaku scored again. You can't tell me on the one hand that you're only interested in the last 2-3 games and on the other hand tell me how many goals a Dybala or a Lukaku has scored in the last 34 games, when all of a sudden you're interested in the fact that a Dybala scored 27 games ago. Because these are statistics over a longer period than 2-3 games. So a list of goalscorers should be of no interest to you.

But it's nice that you listened to me in the end and combined the x2 and the under 2.5. The odds were great

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL wrote on 06.05.2024 at 07:17: oh you don't get it

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 06.05.2024 at 07:23:
Right, but penalty kicks in Serie A are scored by Dybala (Penalty Goals - Serie A 2023/2024 | Kickest) and therefore it is - regardless of the statistics - more likely that he will score. Ultimately, however, these analyses are a waste of time anyway, because things can turn out differently than you think or even hope. After all, Lukaku scored the goal

Yes, thanks for your suggestion, but I also risked a little more than I actually intended because Juve weren't allowed to lose as a result. They were even behind. As I said, I didn't think they'd get a win, but one under 2.5. 14 points from the last 14 games is the result. I hope something will finally change in the summer. But I highly doubt it. Allegri still has a contract until 2025 and Juve are not swimming in money. They certainly won't give him €9m just like that.

By the way, the fact that it worked out after all borders on a miracle. I watched the game yesterday and Rome were like a different team, especially from the 2nd half onwards. No comparison to Roma, who lost 2-0 to Leverkusen in the EL. They pressed endlessly and it felt like there was a corner every 2-3 minutes. Both goalkeepers performed miracles and several 100% chances were missed. The game was played at a really high tempo. Rarely experienced something like that from Rome. As I said, it could have ended 4-4.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi wrote on 06.05.2024 at 08:18:

Yeah well but you were thinking about Juve winning anyway. I remember that you even resisted Rome scoring a goal. I wrote to you that the odds are good for a goal from Roma. Just read what you wrote again. I was speaking for Roma and you for Juve. So don't tell me you didn't think Juve would win. You can read it all. You threw in some wild statistics. So don't twist everything here.


" What else can you type with less than 2.5? There's hardly anything. What I find awesome: the odds for Roma over 0.5 goals are 1.44. That's for a defensive team like Juve, mind you...

Alternatively, you could bet on the winner." Quote from you! So if I had guessed what you wrote then I would have bet Juve win, under 2.5 and Roma don't score. xD

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL wrote on 06.05.2024 at 09:14: Are you writing all this during your working hours?

Funny jobs you have

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL wrote on 06.05.2024 at 09:14: Are you writing all this during your working hours?

Funny jobs you have

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 06.05.2024 at 08:38:
Winner bet yes - but not on Juve. If you're going to quote that, then please quote this as well

" No, I also trust Juve to win 0-0, 1-0 or 1-1. I don't trust them to win. I trust them to get an under 2.5. Your suggestion is what I want to bet on, but I have to take extra risk for that. Actually, I would only go for under 2.5."

Edit: maybe you mean I threw out the stat that Allegri has the most 1-0 wins. Was just a fact that speaks for under 2.5. Never thought about a Juve win bet. As I said, before yesterday's game it was 13 points from 13 games. I also wrote that Juve were very good at the beginning of the season and are currently in a down phase.

Or you mean the 1-0, which is Rome-Juve, so 1-0 was also a Rome win. Otherwise I wouldn't have written that I have to take extra risks (that Juve can't lose). I specifically wrote that I don't think Juve can win I can't write it any clearer than that

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi wrote on 06.05.2024 at 10:22 am:

Okeeeey?! You write alternatively on Juve, so either under 2.5 or win Juve, and then you write that you don't trust them to win while one sentence before you write that you trust Juve to win 0-0 1-0 1-1? That contradicts itself. Never mind, don't bother, we're going round in circles and you can't see that what you're writing is nonsense anyway

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg wrote on 06.05.2024 at 13:07: If in the end it's really only about not exceeding the minimum quota too much, because the Risk of not getting your reward is then a little higher, then you can really close the area again...

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg wrote on 06.05.2024 at 13:07: If in the end it's really only about not exceeding the minimum quota too much, because the Risk of not getting your reward is then a little higher, then you can really close the area again...

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 06.05.2024 at 14:59:

I can't subscribe to that. If it wasn't for the monthly raffle, many people wouldn't be on the forum. Is (unfortunately) a fact. Just like the ratings. Only the rewards are the reason why they are rated so often and GJ knows that by now. I took the trouble to rate Pino because I am satisfied with the service overall (better than Platin, especially in terms of service!) and wanted to recommend it to others. You can see the difference.

So saying it would be better not to give a reward really helps. GJ also benefits from this, not just the authors. It's difficult to get 3 tips right in a row - regardless of whether they are 1.6 or 3 odds. That's why I think it's okay to be rewarded if you do manage it.

The fact is that...


the diversity of bets is currently low
there are not many authors
it is currently not profitable to place high odds (opportunity costs)
there is not much interaction between users/authors. With luck you will find 1-2 comments, that's it.
is very confusing

Our feedback will certainly not be able to eliminate all deficits, but as you can see, my feedback has brought to light some users who would at least be interested in higher quotas.

This post has been translated automatically