You can see how high the interest in your tips is based on the comments and the clicks you can leave. My thought was also first that it might interest one or the other but I quickly discarded the thought because I see how many people click on something 😂
Yes well, I also look at the tips, but usually don't leave a click or comment...
Yes well, I also look at the tips, but usually do not leave a click or comment...
Yeah bad for the people who hope someone will take notice. I don't read it and it has the same effect as your reading because it seems to the writer as if nobody is reading. Olli, for example, occasionally leaves a comment. I think that's great so that the writer can see that there is interest. Otherwise it's a hope that someone will notice it without telling you and a hope for 3 x right in a row. The latter is more likely.
Donnie wrote on 03.05.2024 at 16:05:
Of course there are people who play odds of 1.7. Have you still not realized that people should be introduced to sports betting? This serves that purpose, just like a betting game, etc. But by now people should have understood what sports betting is. It's just like playing slots in a casino, just another form of gambling
Without wanting to attack you, but sports betting isn't really your thing, is it? It just doesn't make sense to bet on odds where you don't even double your bet. Especially not in the long term. I think that the majority of people also tend to play "small". But of course you can bet your pins however you like.
And you could find out whether this section has brought "newcomers" closer to the sports betting topic by conducting a survey.
I doubt it.
But it wouldn't be too much to ask now to form your own combination of e.g. rainmann and olli's tips.
The fact that individual betting tips are not interesting can be ruled out due to the many sites that present them. It doesn't matter whether you play them individually or as a combination or as a supplement in your own combination.
How interesting the whole thing is for the GJ community would also interest me. To be honest, I'm not just writing the tips to force a compulsion, but I hope someone is interested too😄
I think you already know exactly what I mean. It's not about putting something together. I could certainly do it, but it's also about bringing "interested parties" closer to sports betting.
It would also be clearer if author X, for example, posted a combination that I think is bettable and where I know the author has a good hand at the moment and everyone can benefit from it. Of course there is no guarantee that the combination will go through, but we all know a "run".
Of course I also play single bets from time to time, but generally only from odds of 3.
But as I said, everyone should do what they want.
This is just my opinion on the subject.
Yes but that certainly reflects people's general betting behavior. Out of 1000 people, the majority are guaranteed to score on both or on Über.goals can always happen somehow and you're just not dependent on who wins.even with Bayern against Bochum, hardly anyone goes for Bayern's normal win. They play high handicaps, go for umpteen goals or both score. Is a home win for Dortmund more unrealistic than both teams scoring against Bochum? I don't know. I think the odds are also extremely blinding.
In general, I don't think many people here read what you write about the games. Let that be 10 people at most. There are hardly ever any reactions to the tips. I see it as a chance to make a few coins on the side and that's that.
Sorry I wasn't at home, can only reply now.
I can't say that. That's just your assumption, but only statistics could prove whether it's true. However, I see enough tickets on the Internet where bets are placed on winners, half-time bets (on goals in the first half) or other things.
Right, most people would take HC in a goal festival, I completely agree with you. The odds are particularly high there. So you would also share it here in the community Tip - but it's not worth it if you have to Risk the winning streak in order to get the same reward for the minimum odds.
Yes, I can well imagine that many people don't read the analyses completely or hardly at all. As I said, I put Totten-Arsenal over 3.5 as a tip a few days ago. I had to pull the words out of my nose...
Lionking wrote on 03.05.2024 at 15:42: I'd be interested to know who, apart from the authors perhaps, even plays these individual tips with mini odds.
Who in the community is even interested in this area and reads the analyses?
Maybe that would be something for a GJ survey.
I, for example, read through the first analyses at the beginning, but then quickly lost interest.
It would be different with 2-3 player combos, where you at least reach a quota of 3 or more, there would be no need for a huge analysis.
I would also find combos like Rainmann or Olli the Owl with ice hockey or basketball interesting.
The survey would then have to be remunerated with coins, because otherwise there wouldn't be enough. Take a look at the number of participants in paid polls and normal polls
Lionking wrote on 03.05.2024 at 15:59:
Yes, basically it's just about bagging the Obolus and the authors are allowed to do so, why not if GJ offers it that way?
But I don't see any added value for the community here.
Nobody plays single bets with odds of 1.7.
Yes, I have to agree with Donnie. It is alluded to. Of course there are people (not just a few) who choose at least 2 odds and play them as single bets, but there are also people who play a lot of <2 odds with 1-2€ (receipts). So you're both right.
Patizi wrote on 03.05.2024 at 16:29:
You can see the participation in the thread bzgl sports betting. If there is nothing, hardly anyone writes in. Probably just 10 people when it comes up. Regularly probably 5-6. If there is something to win, competitions, several people write in at once. So you can see that it's important to give something in return (e.g. 20 euros for 3 correct tips) if you want to get people involved. People would prefer not to put in any effort, along the lines of "Bayern-Bochum win 1". You can put a little effort into it.
The fact that the participation is really low should be proof enough that the current system is not interesting enough.
I can also understand that somewhere. Which user here reads tips from 4 different authors and then puts them together in a combination? You're an exception, who currently has several tips for the same matchday, but as an author I would leave it at a maximum of 1-2 individual tips.
In addition, I don't think the 150 words are bad in themselves, but a little too high for a single game. 100 words would be just as sufficient.
I think you know exactly what I mean. It's not about putting something together. I could certainly do it, but it's also about bringing "interested parties" closer to sports betting.
It would also be clearer if author X, for example, posted a combination that I think is bettable and where I know the author has a good hand at the moment and everyone can benefit from it. Of course there is no guarantee that the combination will go through, but we all know a "run".
Of course I also play single bets from time to time, but generally only from odds of 3.
But as I said, everyone should do what they want.
This is just my opinion on the subject.
Of course it would also be a bit more convenient if you were presented with a combination.
But in my opinion, combos with more than 2 - 3 games are even more gambling than single bets and therefore it is also more serious to give a well-founded single tip.
You know the sites, wettbasis etc. too.
The effort they put into it and the Affiliate partners they have, it's clear to me that the interest is there.
And there are only individual tips.
I'm not saying that the tips here are just as good, better or worse.
But there is definitely interest in individual tips for individual games. Even if, in the end, many people are sure to incorporate them into combos...
I would also be happy to see combos posted in advance. But I think that can stay in the forum. Or take place, there's usually not... 😄
The fact that the participation is really low should be proof enough that the current system is not interesting enough.
I can also understand that somewhere. Which user here reads tips from 4 different authors and then puts them together in a combination? You're an exception, who currently has several tips for the same matchday, but as an author I would leave it at a maximum of 1-2 individual tips.
In addition, I don't think the 150 words are bad in themselves, but a little too high for a single game. 100 words would be just as sufficient.
Tottenham vs Arsenal offers enough. The table situation. Fight for the championship, Tottenham's fight for the CL, Arsenal best away team. Put all that into sentences and you've easily got your 150 words in there.
What do you think the attendance would be like if you paid nothing? Trust me, it's all about the reward. It's not the interest in the thing itself. That's only the case for very few people.
You can see the participation in the thread regarding sports betting. If there is nothing, hardly anyone writes in. Probably just 10 people when it comes up. Regularly probably 5-6. If there is something to win, competitions, several people write in at once. So you can see that it's important to give something in return (e.g. the 20 euros for 3 correct tips) if you want to get people involved. People would prefer not to put in any effort, along the lines of "Bayern-Bochum win 1". You can put a little effort into it.
It's also perfectly ok to get a reward for successful tips. After all, the authors make an effort and do their analyses to the best of their knowledge and belief.
For me, however, these individual match analyses are not interesting.
You could also post 2-3 combos that you can play directly.
If an author wins 2 combos in a row, there would then be a reward.
All this is just an idea to possibly change something.
Tottenham vs Arsenal offers enough after all. The table situation. Fight for the championship, Tottenham's fight for the CL, Arsenal best away team. Put all that into sentences and you've easily got your 150 words in there.
What do you think the attendance would be like if you paid nothing? Trust me, it's all about the reward. It's not the interest in the thing itself. That's only the case for very few people.
Yes, I've done everything and still had trouble getting to 150. Come on, who writes Tottenham Hotspur FC please Read my Tip (if you haven't already). In the end I couldn't remember and wrote "After all, it's a derby " because I was missing a few words and couldn't think of another reason at the time.
The participation without a reward would hardly be there and much worse than it is now. That's clear. But if GJ offers some kind of reward, then there's a reason for it. The only gap I see in the current system is that higher odds (including higher risk) are not rewarded much more than the minimum odds.
Incidentally, I would also have gone for Arsenal on the Arsenal tip because Tottenham are not currently playing at the same level. You can see that from the table. So it would have been even bigger odds (Arsenal win + 3.5 goals), but why Risk it?
Basically, it's just about getting 3 relatively "safe" tips through to get the zwanni and not to bring anyone closer to sports betting or to present tips with more Risk, ergo better odds, which might also benefit non-authors.
Lionking wrote on 03.05.2024 at 18:18: So basically it's just about getting 3 relatively "safe" tips through to get the zwanni and not to bring anyone closer to sports betting or to present tips with more Risk, ergo better odds, which might also benefit non-authors.
It's just an incentive. It would be wrong to say that you don't do it for the coins.
But it annoys me a little at the moment. I'd give Roma-Juve under 2.5 as a community Tip, but I can't find anything over 1.59. What's the point of giving an extra tip? Really unnecessary and a shame.
I'm not much too late either. The game takes place on Sunday...
Hey friends, you're forgetting one thing. These sports betting tips are written for Google so that new users and new sports bettors come to this page and then register with the betting Provider via the link/button. And these new users or even non-users, because you can also register via the links. The long text is supposed to show seriousness! As I have said before, these other sites write even more texts, novels and everything in detail!
So we are already writing for the community and helping to generate new users.
Yes, basically it's just about bagging the obolus and the authors are allowed to do so, why not if GJ offers it that way?
But I don't see any added value for the community here.
Nobody plays single bets with odds of 1.7.
Of course there are. Me, for example You get better results with single tips than with combination bets. I don't know why everyone in this forum puts combination bets above single bets...
Olli_Eule wrote on 03.05.2024 at 18:25: Hey friends, you're forgetting one thing. These sports betting tips are written for Google so that new users and new sports bettors come to this page and then register with the betting Provider via the link / button. And these new users or even non-users, because you can also register via the links. The long text is supposed to show seriousness! As I have said before, these other sites write even more texts, novels and everything in detail!
So we are already writing for the community and helping to generate new users.
Only GJ can answer whether this is the case. You can give us some figures
As I said, do a survey, pay with a few coins and then you'll know what's going on.
Sure there are. Me for example You get better results with single bets than with combined bets. I don't know why everyone in this forum puts combination bets above single bets...
Ok, let me put it this way, it's not primarily about single bets, but about the odds.
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes well, I also look at the tips, but usually don't leave a click or comment...
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yeah bad for the people who hope someone will take notice. I don't read it and it has the same effect as your reading because it seems to the writer as if nobody is reading. Olli, for example, occasionally leaves a comment. I think that's great so that the writer can see that there is interest. Otherwise it's a hope that someone will notice it without telling you and a hope for 3 x right in a row. The latter is more likely.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Without wanting to attack you, but sports betting isn't really your thing, is it? It just doesn't make sense to bet on odds where you don't even double your bet. Especially not in the long term. I think that the majority of people also tend to play "small". But of course you can bet your pins however you like.
And you could find out whether this section has brought "newcomers" closer to the sports betting topic by conducting a survey.
I doubt it.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
I think you already know exactly what I mean. It's not about putting something together. I could certainly do it, but it's also about bringing "interested parties" closer to sports betting.
It would also be clearer if author X, for example, posted a combination that I think is bettable and where I know the author has a good hand at the moment and everyone can benefit from it. Of course there is no guarantee that the combination will go through, but we all know a "run".
Of course I also play single bets from time to time, but generally only from odds of 3.
But as I said, everyone should do what they want.
This is just my opinion on the subject.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sorry I wasn't at home, can only reply now.
I can't say that. That's just your assumption, but only statistics could prove whether it's true. However, I see enough tickets on the Internet where bets are placed on winners, half-time bets (on goals in the first half) or other things.
Right, most people would take HC in a goal festival, I completely agree with you. The odds are particularly high there. So you would also share it here in the community Tip - but it's not worth it if you have to Risk the winning streak in order to get the same reward for the minimum odds.
Yes, I can well imagine that many people don't read the analyses completely or hardly at all. As I said, I put Totten-Arsenal over 3.5 as a tip a few days ago. I had to pull the words out of my nose...
The survey would then have to be remunerated with coins, because otherwise there wouldn't be enough. Take a look at the number of participants in paid polls and normal polls
Yes, I have to agree with Donnie. It is alluded to. Of course there are people (not just a few) who choose at least 2 odds and play them as single bets, but there are also people who play a lot of <2 odds with 1-2€ (receipts). So you're both right.
The fact that the participation is really low should be proof enough that the current system is not interesting enough.
I can also understand that somewhere. Which user here reads tips from 4 different authors and then puts them together in a combination? You're an exception, who currently has several tips for the same matchday, but as an author I would leave it at a maximum of 1-2 individual tips.
In addition, I don't think the 150 words are bad in themselves, but a little too high for a single game. 100 words would be just as sufficient.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Of course it would also be a bit more convenient if you were presented with a combination.
But in my opinion, combos with more than 2 - 3 games are even more gambling than single bets and therefore it is also more serious to give a well-founded single tip.
You know the sites, wettbasis etc. too.
The effort they put into it and the Affiliate partners they have, it's clear to me that the interest is there.
And there are only individual tips.
I'm not saying that the tips here are just as good, better or worse.
But there is definitely interest in individual tips for individual games. Even if, in the end, many people are sure to incorporate them into combos...
I would also be happy to see combos posted in advance. But I think that can stay in the forum. Or take place, there's usually not... 😄
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Tottenham vs Arsenal offers enough. The table situation. Fight for the championship, Tottenham's fight for the CL, Arsenal best away team. Put all that into sentences and you've easily got your 150 words in there.
What do you think the attendance would be like if you paid nothing? Trust me, it's all about the reward. It's not the interest in the thing itself. That's only the case for very few people.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
It's also perfectly ok to get a reward for successful tips. After all, the authors make an effort and do their analyses to the best of their knowledge and belief.
For me, however, these individual match analyses are not interesting.
You could also post 2-3 combos that you can play directly.
If an author wins 2 combos in a row, there would then be a reward.
All this is just an idea to possibly change something.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, I've done everything and still had trouble getting to 150. Come on, who writes Tottenham Hotspur FC please Read my Tip (if you haven't already). In the end I couldn't remember and wrote "After all, it's a derby " because I was missing a few words and couldn't think of another reason at the time.
The participation without a reward would hardly be there and much worse than it is now. That's clear. But if GJ offers some kind of reward, then there's a reason for it. The only gap I see in the current system is that higher odds (including higher risk) are not rewarded much more than the minimum odds.
Incidentally, I would also have gone for Arsenal on the Arsenal tip because Tottenham are not currently playing at the same level. You can see that from the table. So it would have been even bigger odds (Arsenal win + 3.5 goals), but why Risk it?
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Liked this post: Nik89
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
It's just an incentive. It would be wrong to say that you don't do it for the coins.
But it annoys me a little at the moment. I'd give Roma-Juve under 2.5 as a community Tip, but I can't find anything over 1.59. What's the point of giving an extra tip? Really unnecessary and a shame.
I'm not much too late either. The game takes place on Sunday...
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
So we are already writing for the community and helping to generate new users.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Liked this post: Dr-Strange, Langhans_innen, Patizi, Rainmann
Of course there are. Me, for example You get better results with single tips than with combination bets. I don't know why everyone in this forum puts combination bets above single bets...
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Only GJ can answer whether this is the case. You can give us some figures
As I said, do a survey, pay with a few coins and then you'll know what's going on.
This post has been translated automatically
Community betting tips
Nobody has liked this post so far
Ok, let me put it this way, it's not primarily about single bets, but about the odds.
This post has been translated automatically