Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Sports betting in general: kFkA (short question short answer) on sports betting (Page 22)

Topic created on 09th May. 2017 | Page: 22 of 24 | Answers: 234 | Views: 31,535
Hanshanshans
Elite

JJepsa96 wrote on 06.10.2024 at 20:03:Maybe you can look it up again, unfortunately I can't copy it right now:


but under 3.12.8 it clearly states that all 9 or 8.5 innings must be completed for bets on "total runs" to be settled correctly.

In this game, however, a maximum of 7.0 innings were played.

The first person in support said that would be settled correctly, but he didn't really have a clue.

A second lady then said she would pass it on to the relevant department.

From my point of view, 3.12.8 is clear. I bet on over 10.5 runs in total, but no 8.5 or 9 innings were completed. The incorrect evaluation is not correct. This must be canceled.

I agree. 9 innings must be played for the bet to remain valid, otherwise it must be canceled. Otherwise it could be used to the disadvantage of the provider. If there is a threat of a weather-related interruption, quickly place an under bet.

You can wait and see what the responsible department writes.
I had a similar situation 2 years ago, which was initially rejected by support, but I received my win a day later. Gladbach were leading 2:0 in Bochum and a short time later the game was abandoned due to a beer cup being thrown at the linesman. I was at Interwetten. They also have the "2 goal lead guarantee". But this is only settled after the game. Support said that a match abandonment was not covered. However, the terms and conditions clearly state "Bet won, no matter what happens".

This post has been translated automatically

JJepsa96
Rookie

Hanshanshans wrote on 06.10.2024 at 20:50:

I agree. 9 innings must be played for the bet to remain valid, otherwise it will be canceled. Could otherwise be used to the disadvantage of the provider. If there is a threat of a weather-related interruption, quickly place an under bet.

You can wait and see what the responsible department writes.
I had a similar situation 2 years ago, which was also initially rejected by support, but I received my win a day later. Gladbach were leading 2:0 in Bochum and a short time later the game was abandoned due to a beer cup being thrown at the linesman. I was at Interwetten. They also have the "2 goal lead guarantee". But this is only settled after the game. Support said that a match abandonment was not covered. However, the terms and conditions clearly state "bet won, no matter what happens".

Result was declared invalid and therefore canceled. But only because I pointed out point 3.12.8.


Thanks again for the feedback hanshanshans, it was a good Tip to take another look at the terms and conditions.

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert
On this extremely gloomy afternoon, you can take care of cloudy cups Especially in the case of Bet.3000.

There were "irritations" with the GGL in the summer, whereupon everything was closed for a while before the stationary betting shops were allowed to reopen. The online presence is still flat, although at https://maintenance.bet3000.de/ you can read something about immediate payouts, which you can request by email. I did so, but after exactly one week there was no response. Yes, there was an automatic reply with a transaction number Sure, you can repeat everything and a week is not too long. Has anyone had money withdrawn from their betting account in the last few weeks or even months? What "news" I can find about the situation still doesn't say much more than "let's see if and when it continues online". Thank you very much, dear fellow bettors

This post has been translated automatically

Luka1310
Hello everyone,

Does anyone play at Betano regularly and can perhaps tell me how often you receive a bonus from the system?
Despite countless depositors, without cashing out, I have not received anything for 2/3 months.
I would be happy to receive feedback

LG

This post has been translated automatically

JJepsa96
Rookie

Luka1310 wrote on 19.10.2024 at 16:19: Hello everyone,

Does anyone play at Betano regularly and can maybe say how often you get a bonus from the system.
Despite countless depositors without cashing out, I have not received anything for 2/3 months.
I would be happy to receive feedback

LG

It's rather unusual that you no longer receive anything. Did you make big wins before and were you blocked there for a short time (24h block)?

This post has been translated automatically

Luka1310

JJepsa96 wrote on October 19, 2024 at 5:53 pm:

Rather unusual that you no longer receive anything. Did you make big wins before and were you blocked there for a short time (24h block)?

No, unfortunately I did not make any wins and was not blocked.

The bonus for loyal customers was the main reason for playing there, but apparently I have to accept it and look at other providers.
Thanks for the answer

This post has been translated automatically

K****y
It seems you had a tough situation with the bookmaker. It's important to remember that rules can vary between operators, and sometimes support may not know all the details. I hope you get clarity on your case from the responsible department. Be sure to keep an eye on the situation and don't hesitate to reach out to a lawyer if needed. It's great that you have experience, as well as other participants, to share stories and advice.
Carmelo
Rookie
Assuming I had a limit of 6500 euros with Provider X
then i re-registered with a provider and had to confirm a limit of 1000 euros. it was not possible to transfer the old limit. an increase was not possible immediately after re-registration. the provider refused.

now i have REDUCED the limit from 6500 to 4000 euros with provider X. the reduction was accepted with a waiting period of 7 days.
can i then set 4000€ again after the time has expired?

This post has been translated automatically

JJepsa96
Rookie

Carmelo wrote on 09.11.2024 at 10:54: Assuming I had a limit of 6500 euros with Provider X
then i re-registered with a provider and had to confirm a limit of 1000 euros. it was not possible to take over the old limit. an increase was not possible immediately after re-registration. the provider refused.

now i have REDUCED the limit from 6500 to 4000 euros with provider X. the reduction was accepted with a waiting period of 7 days.
can i then set 4000€ again after the time has expired?

I mean the lowest set limit applies. But if you can always go up and down with different providers, I'm not sure.

This post has been translated automatically

Carmelo
Rookie
Normally, the limit should be visible from the providers with the GGL database, LIVE in real time. However, Provider X showed 6500 euros. I have now downgraded this to 4K so that this is reported to LUGAS again. Then the 1000€ limit should be gone?

Everyone who has a higher limit and registers somewhere is asked to accept a 1000€ limit. That's why I downgraded the 6500 euro to 4000 €... so that the 1000€ limit is gone

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics21st Nov. 2024 at 10:35 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately