Sports betting in general: kFkA (short question short answer) on sports betting (Page 22)

JJepsa96 wrote on 06.10.2024 at 20:03:Maybe you can look it up again, unfortunately I can't copy it right now:


but under 3.12.8 it clearly states that all 9 or 8.5 innings must be completed for bets on "total runs" to be settled correctly.

In this game, however, a maximum of 7.0 innings were played.

The first person in support said that would be settled correctly, but he didn't really have a clue.

A second lady then said she would pass it on to the relevant department.

From my point of view, 3.12.8 is clear. I bet on over 10.5 runs in total, but no 8.5 or 9 innings were completed. The incorrect evaluation is not correct. This must be canceled.

This post has been translated automatically

Hanshanshans wrote on 06.10.2024 at 20:50:

I agree. 9 innings must be played for the bet to remain valid, otherwise it will be canceled. Could otherwise be used to the disadvantage of the provider. If there is a threat of a weather-related interruption, quickly place an under bet.

You can wait and see what the responsible department writes.
I had a similar situation 2 years ago, which was also initially rejected by support, but I received my win a day later. Gladbach were leading 2:0 in Bochum and a short time later the game was abandoned due to a beer cup being thrown at the linesman. I was at Interwetten. They also have the "2 goal lead guarantee". But this is only settled after the game. Support said that a match abandonment was not covered. However, the terms and conditions clearly state "bet won, no matter what happens".

This post has been translated automatically