Sports betting in general: Guest authors at GambleJoe

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Andre wrote on 22.01.2024 at 19:01: Moin together,

the idea of guest authors at betting tips was a big idea for me from the beginning and I would like to implement it in the future. My "dream" is to have a lot of users on our site and to exchange tips and analyses with each other. I would like to point out right away at that the focus is on having fun and unfortunately nobody will get rich here. There will always be bad phases and my previous betting tips are the perfect example of this. In the future, the whole thing should be automatic and run like the no-deposit offers, for example.

I am now planning a kind of test phase for the end of January and February. The guest authors should send me their tips via PN or e-mail (andre@gamblejoe.com) and I will then publish them on the site.

If a guest author gets three tips in a row right, we'll give them €10 worth of coins. Here, too, you can see during the test phase whether and how you can do this. I can also imagine a "race" between the guest authors, for example.

Rules for the Tip:

• At least 150 words


• Minimum odds 1.60


• send the text to me 24 hours before the start of the match


• Each guest author is limited to 1 tip per day


• Tip must come from one of our sports betting providers - but you are welcome to vary here

I look forward to your feedback and especially to your analysis

You don't need to apply or anything like that, just go ahead and send me your tips.

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL wrote on 22.01.2024 at 23:47: great idea from you slots have no future

it would also be more interesting if you could read the reasons for the tips yourself and, if necessary, add to or criticize them

This post has been translated automatically

Andre wrote on 22.01.2024 at 19:01: Moin together,

If a guest author gets three tips in a row right, we'll give them €10 worth of coins. Here, too, you can see during the test phase whether and how you can do this. I can also imagine a "race" between the guest authors, for example.

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 23.01.2024 at 03:57:
I don't know if you have any concrete ideas yet, but here I would think of a scoreboard. Depending on the number of guest authors, you can then reward the best, the second best or the third best with prizes. Here it is important to pay attention not only to the winning tips, but also to the odds. Otherwise it would be unfair to those who play at higher odds.

Tip was correct: 3 points

Tip was wrong: 1 point

The formula for the number of points could look like this: Number of points + (2x odds).

Example: A suggests Tip X with a 1.6Q. B suggests tip Y with a 2.5Q. C gives a tip with a 2Q and this does not work out.

A: 3+(2x1.6) =6.2 points
B: 3+(2x2.5) = 8 points
C: 1+(2x2,0) = 4 points or 1+(2,0)=3*

I am of the opinion that a higher Risk must be rewarded accordingly. Even if the tip is wrong. Alternatively, the "odds boost" (2 multiplier) could only be included in the event of a win*. The latter wouldn't even be wrong, in my opinion.

Just a suggestion, of course You still decide how it will work^^

Edit: to protect the system, the max. odds used for the calculation in case of a wrong tip is 2.0. Otherwise you could take odds of 100 and dribble the system ^^ In case of a win, the guest author with the correct tip would therefore always have an advantage over guest authors who have made a wrong tip.

This post has been translated automatically

gambler67 wrote on 23.01.2024 09:14:

i think it should stay simple and not high2x 3 and anything else- who should do the work and effort Tip wrong 0 pnkte what for there still a point????

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 23.01.2024 at 09:31:
I also wrote that in my proposal. Because I think that a certain amount of Risk should also be rewarded. Otherwise you could take the easy way out and just hit both or similar odds that work out more often. As mentioned above, this would be unfair to those who opt for a different odds (3.2) instead of the minimum odds of 1.6. It is also unfair to distribute the same points if someone hits a 1.6Q and someone else a 3.2. Both would have made 1 point according to your logic. I think the 3.2Q that was hit should carry more weight.


I estimate that there will be a maximum of 10 guest authors at the first attempt. So it's not that much effort. You can manage this wonderfully in Excel. Excel then calculates everything for you automatically. You just have to know the formulas (IF function) There were campaigns that required more effort. Andre, for example, had a lot of work during a prediction game Tournament (I think the first prediction game ever). Andre constantly kept the results of 30+ users up to date.

As I said, it was just an idea. Andre is certainly happy about opinions/ideas from the community. But Adre remains the one who sets the final rules of the game. Not me or anyone else.

This post has been translated automatically

roccoammo11 wrote on January 23rd, 2024 at 10:44 am:

How do you know that there will be max 10gastauthors? Andre wrote that you should just write it without applying for it, so 100 analyzes could reach him..and if all of them meet the requirements I can't imagine that Andre would only pick ten of them..then 90 others wouldn't be interested in the campaign anymore or not? I trust Andre's vision, whatever the final result will look like, and he's doing a test phase for now

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically