Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Sports betting in general: General sports betting thread 2021 (Page 500)

Topic created on 17th Aug. 2019 | Page: 500 of 600 | Answers: 5,996 | Views: 857,366
Patizi
Elite
himmel80 wrote on 01/09/2021 at 20:59
7 times, who creates such a thing

So if I think about how often I play with 50 euros until I pay them off...sas goes certainly far beyond the 7 times 😂

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite
What are your biggest cashout disasters?

in the facebook group you can read the worst cashouts there are.

one has cashed there 3 euros, with 10 euros stake. Schein came would have been about 200.

one had 400 cashout, highest would be 700 win, he went a smoke, then fell the 1 to 1. then everything was gone.

yet another had 1400 already sure but wanted to have the 3000, has made no cashout, violates his principles.

My stupid cashouts were, 2 times 50 euro cashout, but the bills came each 200 euro and 260 euro.

Then another 24 euro cashout, 68 euro came as a sham ...

Cashout is not worth it ... never again

This post has been translated automatically

danny005
Elite
himmel80 wrote on 01/09/2021 at 23:02: What are your biggest cashout disasters?

in the facebook group you can read the worst cashouts there are.

one has cashed out there 3 euros, with 10 euros stake. Schein came would have been to the 200.

one had 400 cashout, highest would be 700 win, he went a smoke, then fell the 1 to 1. then everything was gone.

yet another had 1400 already sure but wanted to have the 3000, has made no cashout, violates his principles.

My stupid cashouts were, 2 times 50 euro cashout, but the bills came each 200 euro and 260 euro.

Then another 24 euro cashout, 68 euro came as a sham ...

Cashout is not worth ... never again

Instead of cashout I often prefer to hedge with combos, if only 1 game is still in the shooting phase and the tipped team leads. Have I a few days ago at Atletico Madrid against Villarreal of course not made and the own goal in the 95th minute has broken me the ticket with a 42 odds

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite
danny005 wrote on 01.09.2021 at 23:20
Instead of cashout, I often prefer to hedge on combos when there is only 1 game left in the shootout phase and the tipped team is leading. Have I a few days ago at Atletico Madrid against Villarreal of course not made and the own goal in the 95th minute has broken me the ticket with a 42 odds

with me exactly the other way around was a 200 er quote...

then Frankfurt Werder X tippt... Frankfurt led 2 to 1 until stoppage time, then Bremen elfmeter 2 to 2

well I then just cashout at 50 euros

6.10.2019

This post has been translated automatically

slotliebe89
Elite
I avoid cashouts. When I play a combo, I already give it enough thought beforehand

This post has been translated automatically

Butterbrezel
Elite
A cashout is generally not recommended.

Let's take the annoying game Acropolis - Värnamo as an example.

I bet on X for 3.3 with 10.00 EUR.
The score is 1:1.
In the 84th minute, the Provider offers a cashout of 22 EUR.

If I had accepted the cashout, I would have won in this case (because in the 93rd minute the score was 1:2), but in the long run I would make a loss, because the X would not have the odds of 3.3, but, if I had accepted at 22 EUR, the odds would be 2.2.
That means, if I would do this for every game, I would need a nearly 50% hit rate on X to make a win in the long run. This is very unrealistic.

With the cashout option, only the provider wins.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
Wutmaennchen wrote on 02.09.2021 at 09:21: A cashout is generally not recommended.

Let's take the annoying game Acropolis - Värnamo as an example.

I bet on X for 3.3 with 10.00 EUR.
The score is 1:1.
In the 84th minute, the Provider offers a cashout of 22 EUR.

If I had accepted the cashout, I would have won in this case (because in the 93rd minute the score was 1:2), but in the long run I would make a loss, because the X would not have the odds of 3.3, but, if I had accepted at 22 EUR, the odds would be 2.2.
That means, if I would do this for every game, I would need a nearly 50% hit rate on X to make a win in the long run. This is very unrealistic.

With the cashout option, only the provider wins.


So if you do that for every game, as you wrote, you would then be in the plus

This post has been translated automatically

Butterbrezel
Elite
Patizi wrote on 09/02/2021 at 09:36 AM
So if you do this every game like you wrote, you would be in the plus

No, because I don't have the possibility of a cashout on every tipped game.
There are also games that are completely wrong. A cashout as described above there is only if the game is correct or at least up to this point is correct.

I have this year so far with my X-bets a hit rate of 30% with an average odds of 4.08 (there are also live bets on X). Thereby plus.

If I had now accepted a cashout offer on each of these winning bets, I would have won less on each winning bet. In the example yes the odds 2.2.

And with a hit rate of 30% at a 2.2, of course you make minus.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
Wutmaennchen wrote on 02/09/2021 at 12:33 PM
No, because I don't have the possibility of a cashout on every tipped game.
There are also games that are completely wrong. A cashout as described above is only available if the game is correct or at least correct up to this point.

I have this year so far with my X-bets a hit rate of 30% with an average odds of 4.08 (there are also live bets on X). Thereby plus.

If I had now accepted a cashout offer on each of these winning bets, I would have won less on each winning bet. In the example, yes the odds 2.2.

And with a hit rate of 30% at a 2.2, of course you make minus.

Of course, but then you would also have won the game in Sweden. Since the 30% hit rate would no longer be relevant because this would look different.

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon
This weekend is not much going on, because there is WM Quali. Maybe I bet on a few games in the lower regional leagues.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Nov. 2024 at 04:11 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately