The 50:50 chance amounts to the possible tips: both meet/over or under/winner bets where no draw is possible etc. The odds say nothing. As Bluff said, even 1.1 odds can go down the drain. Also, the Dodgers have a lot of players out. Whether there are important players out I do not know. I find it balanced. Even a "both hit" bet has no 1.5/1.5 odds. I think the odds were very similar. I think 1.7 and 1.8/1.9 I don't remember. A +- 0.2 difference I don't think is bad as I said and you will rarely find bets that have 2 equal odds. Except some over/under in basketball. @Riversong In the first round there were also players who were not allowed to type and were eliminated. How else are you going to do it if both had the choice and both wanted to type the same thing? Who will place his Tip first? I would also find it weak, because I'm not always online 24/7 here and maybe my everyday life is stressful right now. I think for such a mini-tournament the rules are okay. The prize money is not particularly high and it is all based on a voluntary basis on the part of GJ.
frapi07 wrote on 07/13/2023 at 19:43:
The 50:50 chance amounts to the possible picks: both hit/over or under/winner bets where no draw is possible etc.
The odds say nothing. As Bluff said, even 1.1 odds can go down the drain. Also, the Dodgers have a lot of players out. Whether there are important players out I do not know. I find it balanced. Even a "both hit" bet has no 1.5/1.5 odds. I think the odds were very similar. I think 1.7 and 1.8/1.9 I don't remember. A +- 0.2 difference I don't think is bad as I said and you will rarely find bets that have 2 equal odds. Except some over/under in basketball.
@Riversong
In the first round there were also players who were not allowed to type and were eliminated. How else are you going to do it if both had the choice and both wanted to type the same thing? Who will place his Tip first? I would also find it weak, because I'm not always online 24/7 here and maybe my everyday life is stressful right now. I think for such a mini-tournament the rules are okay. The prize money is not particularly high and it is all based on a voluntary basis on the part of GJ.
I'm aware that only 2 way events can be played in the Tournament Yesterday the odds were much tighter...I mean 1.80-1.88. That the thing here is by no means safe a la Bayern-Schalke, I know yet and possibly wins now anyway the outsider...as so often when you are "quite sure" Nevertheless, a quotation such as this overproportionately overprivileges the "serve" and what I have heard so, are now also already 8 people or so on LA gone. In the end it doesn't matter...we're just doing good mood, fun and pastime here, but I'm sure there are more balanced matches. Tennis for example there are 1,84 - 1,86 or similar matches. But please don't nail it down now, or I'll end up looking for one and then not finding one PS. Of course, the odds say something, because there is a lot of money at stake for the bookmakers, which is why they are very well prepared and know for sure that there are Dodgers failures and that this was taken into account in the odds
It was actually harder to find a balanced rate this time. It's simply summer slump.
The Mets play at home, have the better pitcher and have recently regained their form. If everyone is just betting on the Dodgers because they have the minimally smaller odds, I think that's a shame
https://ibb.co/9WbzpQj As you can see, the odds were not equal. The bookies had rather lower odds on both not hitting and both scoring a goal. Yeah, maybe the Dodgers aren't having a good day for once. Who knows? I agree with you there. It's mostly about having fun. I don't know baseball at all, did a little research and find; that the opponent definitely has a good chance.
frapi07 wrote on 07/13/2023 at 8:09 pm:
https://ibb.co/9WbzpQj
As you can see, the odds were not the same. The bookmakers had rather lower odds on both not scoring and both scoring a goal.
Yeah, maybe the Dodgers aren't having a good day for once. Who knows?
I agree with you there. It's mostly about having fun. I don't know baseball at all, did a little research and find; that the opponent definitely has a good chance.
thanks for the screenshot. I don't know when the overview was created (probably just before kickoff), but what I do know: when the bet was posted here, a) the odds were pretty tight at the bookmakers and b) the "both don't score" option was the more likely one, so the other way around. Has surprised me myself, since I as a non-tipper thus originally "was allowed" to bet on the more likely result, but the betting market seems to have turned that - see your screenshot - by its world behavior still significantly
It was a messy ending, but the principle was actually quite good. Everyone could choose "freely". Prize money distribution should still be optimized. Rather several winners distributed, instead of one alone nen "Jackpot".
Had there with Andre a few days ago already written via PN about it, but can yes here also be chatted again about it.
thanks for the screenshot. I don't know when the overview was created (probably just before kickoff), but what I do know: when the bet was posted here, a) the odds at the bookmakers were pretty tight and b) the "both don't score" option was the more likely one, so the other way around. Has surprised me myself, since I as a non-tipper thus originally "was allowed" to bet on the more likely result, but the betting market seems to have turned that - see your screenshot - by its world behavior still significantly
Yes, the timing also plays a role. Odds change all the time, after all. Can change yes also with the current also.
thanks for the screenshot. I don't know when the overview was created (probably just before kickoff), but what I do know: when the bet was posted here, a) the odds at the bookmakers were pretty tight and b) the "both don't score" option was the more likely one, so the other way around. Has surprised me myself, since I as a non-tipper thus originally "was allowed" to bet on the more likely result, but the betting market seems to have turned that - see your screenshot - by its world behavior still significantly
so theoretically it would be quite possible that the market still whips the current baseball odds to 1.87 - 1.87 by kickoff and then Andre's choice was a 1 with an asterisk. The 1.78 - 2.04 is just a snapshot
refucs wrote on 13.07.2023 at 20:40: The whining here partly again is really dreamlike. Can not you just be satisfied when something is offered and you can ONLY WIN.
One can yes a next raffle what GJ organizes itself in another form wish in a separate Fred.
The big GJ summer tournament
Liked this post: Hanshanshans, Langhans_innen
sleepcaphansi
maybe it would be possible to improve it in the next games? to get kicked out without even typing....the dream of all players
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
Wait in the sports betting area I have already seen everything 1.1 odds that go wrong.. etc
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
Then gladly times a suggestion here purely
The users can then give feedback
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Liked this post: bruffl
I'm aware that only 2 way events can be played in the Tournament Yesterday the odds were much tighter...I mean 1.80-1.88. That the thing here is by no means safe a la Bayern-Schalke, I know yet and possibly wins now anyway the outsider...as so often when you are "quite sure" Nevertheless, a quotation such as this overproportionately overprivileges the "serve" and what I have heard so, are now also already 8 people or so on LA gone. In the end it doesn't matter...we're just doing good mood, fun and pastime here, but I'm sure there are more balanced matches. Tennis for example there are 1,84 - 1,86 or similar matches. But please don't nail it down now, or I'll end up looking for one and then not finding one PS. Of course, the odds say something, because there is a lot of money at stake for the bookmakers, which is why they are very well prepared and know for sure that there are Dodgers failures and that this was taken into account in the odds
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
The Mets play at home, have the better pitcher and have recently regained their form. If everyone is just betting on the Dodgers because they have the minimally smaller odds, I think that's a shame
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Liked this post: Langhans_innen
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Liked this post: frapi07
thanks for the screenshot. I don't know when the overview was created (probably just before kickoff), but what I do know: when the bet was posted here, a) the odds were pretty tight at the bookmakers and b) the "both don't score" option was the more likely one, so the other way around. Has surprised me myself, since I as a non-tipper thus originally "was allowed" to bet on the more likely result, but the betting market seems to have turned that - see your screenshot - by its world behavior still significantly
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/sonstiges/sportereignisse/gewinn-tippspiel-301521/#p301521
It was a messy ending, but the principle was actually quite good. Everyone could choose "freely". Prize money distribution should still be optimized. Rather several winners distributed, instead of one alone nen "Jackpot".
Had there with Andre a few days ago already written via PN about it, but can yes here also be chatted again about it.
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Liked this post: Langhans_innen
Yes, the timing also plays a role. Odds change all the time, after all. Can change yes also with the current also.
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
so theoretically it would be quite possible that the market still whips the current baseball odds to 1.87 - 1.87 by kickoff and then Andre's choice was a 1 with an asterisk. The 1.78 - 2.04 is just a snapshot
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
One can yes a next raffle what GJ organizes itself in another form wish in a separate Fred.
Thank you Andre and GJ for the effort.
My Tip: New York Mets
This post has been translated automatically
The big GJ summer tournament
Nobody has liked this post so far
All good and thanks for the praise I did write in that feedback can be posted here.
The only thing missing is the tip from Xavi22
This post has been translated automatically