Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Tips, tricks, strategies... : list of specific games

Topic created on 03rd Jan. 2018 | Page: 1 of 1 | Answers: 5 | Views: 2,227
RiverSong
Legend
can you create a list here with games that give many intermediate winnings and those that give nothing for a long time and then possibly right or is there already?
best make the whole then fix in a post or on a rubric on gamblejoe deposit.

reason is if I want to play a bonus free, which happens from time to time, would be something very helpful for all here.
of course everyone has his own experiences, but with such a constantly updating list you can always discover new games that you can also try out right away.
what do the bosses and you think?

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel
Elite
Well, actually you can already find out roughly on GambleJoe under Casino Games which games tend to throw intermediate wins often (low variance) or few heavy wins (high variance). You can roughly read it from the Win factor and the game list can be sorted by win factor.

If the win factor is high, it is most likely a slot that throws few high wins. If the win factor is low, then it is more likely a slot that tends to throw many small wins.

Of course, it's not that simple, since the win factor only indicates the approximate maximum win per winning picture. Dead or Alive, for example, has a medium win factor but it still has an extremely high potential and also tends to have a very high variance. So you also have to understand or test the game to be able to make a list. But this way you can at least roughly classify the slots.

As said, it is not easy to find out. There are also slots that have an extremely high potential but the payout structure is still designed in such a way that it also throws many small wins and the really big hits are possible but extremely unlikely. Raging Rhino is such a candidate in my opinion.

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel
Elite
Addendum: In the long run, it doesn't really matter which games you play. You can clear a bonus just as well with games that throw few, big wins. If you get a big hit, then you are far ahead and can unlock the bonus in peace.

Bonuses are always against the player and you have to be very lucky to clear a bonus. If you play a game that pays back 95% of your bet after each spin, but you can never win more than your bet, then mathematically you would never be able to clear the bonus. (**)

The decisive factor is rather the payout ratio when wagering the bonus. In my opinion, the best slots to wager Bonuses are those with medium Variance and the highest possible payout ratio.

(**) I know there is no such game. I just wanted to show by a theoretical extreme example, why it makes no difference when converting bonuses, whether a game throws many small wins or few big wins.

This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend
Daniel wrote on 03.01.2018 at 21:27: Well, actually you can already find out roughly on GambleJoe under Casino Games which games tend to throw often intermediate wins (low variance) or few hefty wins (high variance). You can see it roughly by the Win factor and the game list can be sorted by win factor.

If the win factor is high, it is most likely a slot that throws few high wins. If the win factor is low, then it is more likely a slot that tends to throw many small wins.

isn't it rather the other way around? ok, i entered the win factor max, and exactly those come up that i classify as high Risk, i.e. few small wins, e.g. danger hig, queen riches, avalon II 300 shields, etc
with win factor min comes but then the genius jp with me but also ewig not even small wins gives.
not so easy
i just want to play Bonuses kompfortabel without big losses free

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 03.01.2018 at 22:35
Daniel wrote on 03/01/2018 at 21:27: Well, actually you can already roughly figure it out on GambleJoe under casino games which games tend to throw intermediate wins often (low variance) or few hefty wins (high variance). You can see it roughly by the Win factor and the game list can be sorted by win factor.

If the win factor is high, it is most likely a slot that throws few high wins. If the win factor is low, then it is more likely a slot that tends to throw many small wins.

isn't it rather the other way around? ok, i entered the win factor max, and exactly the ones i classify as high Risk come up, i.e. few small wins, e.g. danger hig, queen riches, avalon II 300 shields etc
with win factor min comes but then the genius jp with me but also ewig not even small wins gives.
not so easy
i just want to play Bonuses comfortably without big losses

If I play times with bonus, or by free spins what must convert, I try it also always first with a game with high Variance on relatively high stake (means for me 1euro, play otherwise actually always 20-30 cents stakes) to get first a good win. Without that it does not work in most cases anyway. Should that come, I change to my normal bet and other games.
I also find the assignment not always easy.
With many Merkur, for example, it was somehow clear: there was one spin after another without a win and 30 euros on 20 cents could be gone in 10 minutes. But there was also potential there.

The Big time gaming games also have enormous potential, but I usually get good playing time with them.

With Blueprint games and Quickspin I always have the feeling the potential is rather low and they can still eat like stupid.just Blueprint. But there seems to be good phases when it runs, where you get instead of a fat win often what medium.
But is only my feeling, contradicts the rules of chance, if that would be so intentional.

This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend
Stromberg wrote on 04/01/2018 at 10:07 AM

With Blueprint games and Quickspin I always have the feeling the potential is rather low and they can still eat like stupid.especially Blueprint. For this, there seems to be good phases when it runs, where you often get something medium instead of a fat win.
But is only my feeling, contradicts the rules of chance, if that would be so intentional.

blueprint I agree with you completely, although they are beautifully done, but no matter when I test it does not even come to fs with me so I rather leave it.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 01:22 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately