Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Slot Games in general: Eye of dirt (Page 2)

Topic created on 02nd Sep. 2019 | Page: 2 of 3 | Answers: 21 | Views: 4,515
Anonym

Eye of dirt

3rd Sep. 2019, at 02:44 pm CEST#11
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Knochen wrote on 03/09/2019 at 14:20: Roulette and slots are two different things. The math behind Roulette is simple and above all obvious to everyone. With slots you don't know that so exactly. One has the indication of the RTP but that is also only a statistical average value. The more obscure a thing is, the more mistrust is also stoked. Whereby here in the forum also some distrust the roulette. Even the simple random generator that draws the lottery winners is distrusted.

But there are differences between traditional, analog and digitally programmed roulette.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite

Eye of dirt

3rd Sep. 2019, at 02:46 pm CEST#12
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Of course there are. Analog, the probability results from physics and the laws of nature. Digitally, the probability results from the mathematics of the programming, which is supposed to copy the laws of nature. The end result is exactly the same, but there is of course a technical difference

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Eye of dirt

3rd Sep. 2019, at 02:51 pm CEST#13
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Bones wrote on 03/09/2019 at 14:46: Of course there are. Analog, the probability results from physics and laws of nature. Digitally, the probability results from the mathematics of programming which is supposed to copy the laws of nature. The end result is exactly the same, but there is a technical difference of course.

The result is not the same, even if the consumer is supposed to believe that - and maybe wants to...

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite

Eye of dirt

3rd Sep. 2019, at 02:55 pm CEST#14
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
And it is also the same. Take a look at the permanences of online casinos. Casino Club, for example, publishes them in full. There is nothing conspicuous to see

This post has been translated automatically

argon
Amateur

Eye of dirt

3rd Sep. 2019, at 03:00 pm CEST#15
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
So again I do not think that the win is subject to the random number generator

Even Gauselmann had said in a report that it is calculated despite the coincidence of everything


To Eye of

I have bet 250 € started to play with it at different stakes

From 20 to 1 euro

I got on all FS
Sometimes up sometimes down
I do not stay long on one bet

Now the interesting thing
Despite many free spins I was never over 250
Once I got 260 after long eating rounds
Because he ate so 50

Since then, despite many free spins he always pays so that I do not come over my 250

Only after he again quickly reinging on 1 euro bet he pays me 3 € followed with zero spins on 20 to 40 Bets
Rest 50 € left on speedometer

Duration 8 o'clock to 14 pointless playing




This post has been translated automatically

Ankerwerfer
Rookie

Eye of dirt

3rd Sep. 2019, at 07:28 pm CEST#16
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 03/09/2019 at 14:55: And it is also the same. Look at the permanences of online casinos. Casino Club publishes them completely, for example. There is nothing conspicuous to see.

I can confirm this for European Roulette from NetEnt at Genesis Casino for now. All coups I have played so far (at least those with real money) do not deviate from the standard deviation. It is 493. I can say more exactly when I get to 1000. So far, I'm just extrapolating it, but it fits so far. Here are the percentages:

0: 1.8255578093306288% 9
1: 2.028397565922921% 10
2: 2.636916835699797% 13
3: 2.636916835699797% 13
4: 2.636916835699797% 13
5: 3.6511156186612577% 18
6: 4.056795131845842% 20
7: 3.2454361054766734% 16
8: 3.2454361054766734% 16
9: 1.8255578093306288% 9
10: 2.839756592292089% 14
11: 3.4482758620689653% 17
12: 3.2454361054766734% 16
13: 3.2454361054766734% 16
14: 2.028397565922921% 10
15: 2.636916835699797% 13
16: 2.231237322515213% 11
17: 2.839756592292089% 14
18: 2.839756592292089% 14
19: 1.2170385395537526% 6
20: 2.636916835699797% 13
21: 1.6227180527383367% 8
22: 3.6511156186612577% 18
23: 1.0141987829614605% 5
24: 3.6511156186612577% 18
25: 1.6227180527383367% 8
26: 2.231237322515213% 11
27: 3.2454361054766734% 16
28: 2.636916835699797% 13
29: 2.231237322515213% 11
30: 2.4340770791075053% 12
31: 4.056795131845842% 20
32: 3.0425963488843815% 15
33: 2.636916835699797% 13
34: 3.6511156186612577% 18
35: 3.6511156186612577% 18
36: 1.8255578093306288% 9

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert

Eye of dirt

3rd Sep. 2019, at 11:05 pm CEST#17
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
argon wrote on 03/09/2019 at 15:00: So again I don't think the win is subject to the random number generator

Even Gauselmann had said in a report that it is calculated in spite of chance everything


To Eye of

I have bet 250 € and started to play with it at different bets

From 20 to 1 euro

I got on all FS
Sometimes up sometimes down
I do not stay long on one bet

Now the interesting thing
Despite many free spins I was never over 250
Once I got 260 after long eating rounds
Because he ate so 50

Since then, despite many free spins he always pays so that I do not come over my 250

Only after he again quickly reinging on 1 euro bet he pays me 3 € followed with zero spins on 20 to 40 Bets
Rest 50 € left on speedometer

Duration 8 o'clock to 14 pointless playing

You have a completely different problem. 6 hours playing and call it pointless? You play to make money and because it does not work through the wild umswitchen of the bets it is pointless?

The game is not made for making money, they are psychologically so well done that you are fooled by picture and sound. I sometimes wonder why some think of fair chances at random?

It is a relative coincidence coupled with psychological knowledge, these machines are intelligent money eaters. The free spins can be extremely bad multiple times. My best series were 2x, 0x and about 4x (extra chili).

This post has been translated automatically

argon
Amateur

Eye of dirt

3rd Sep. 2019, at 11:33 pm CEST#18
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Kleinkariert wrote on 09/03/2019 at 23:05
You have a whole other problem. 6 hours of playing and calling it pointless? You play to make money and because it does not work due to the wild umswitchen of the stakes it is pointless?

The game is not made for making money, they are psychologically so well done that you are fooled by picture and sound. I sometimes wonder why some think of fair chances at random?

It is a relative coincidence coupled with psychological knowledge, these machines are intelligent money eaters. The free spins can be extremely bad multiple times. My best series were 2x, 0x and about 4x (extra chili).

This is exactly what I am trying to convey
Thanks to my game tactics it is clear that the games are programmed for certain win amounts
I have used this several times and the results are consistent

Since I am new to OC I am now aware that there is no difference between arcades and OC
Payout ratio in OC is to be considered

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite

Eye of dirt

3rd Sep. 2019, at 11:37 pm CEST#19
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Empirical is your "statistics" with about 6 times bonus but not at all. How does it look for your statistics, if tomorrow someone gets 6x a bonus with over 100x each?

This post has been translated automatically

Liquid
Experienced

Eye of dirt

4th Sep. 2019, at 08:54 am CEST#20
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 03/09/2019 at 23:37: Empirical is your "statistics" with about 6 times bonus but not at all. How does it look for your statistic if tomorrow someone gets 6x a bonus with over 100x each?

Then he work for the casino or gamblejoe./s

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Dec. 2024 at 02:36 pm CET

Watch-out
0
Gossip
0
Offline Casinos
0

GambleJoe Team

Profile picture of JulianJulian online
Community-Manager / Complaint SpecialistProfile picture of CounterCounter
Software developerProfile picture of MatthiasMatthias
Project manager
Profile picture of DanielDaniel
Founder

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately