Addendum and correction, since I can no longer edit the above post: Once it was 65% with answer D, "correct" or randomly chosen by the system was then answer A with 14%. Preliminary conclusion: In my opinion, the data say nothing or are misleading.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
19th Nov. 2018, at 04:27 am CET#12
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Back then he still looked like this^^
I liked it better
It also seems to be an extremely volatile game again, like Bonanza and Extra Chilli. With me it ran very badly, came with FS on 1.4 EUR on a lousy factor of 83 (see picture), which can be naturally because of the fact that it runs with LeoVegas at present anyway catastrophically and the store seems only to swallow.
Bvb1995 wrote on 19.11.2018 at 11:14 am: BBin really not one of those who says at this casino it does not run but at leo it really does not run there what can not be right
I had with LeoVegas about 5 deposits, each with and / or bonus and all went directly to 0, without significant wins, then I locked.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
19th Nov. 2018, at 11:37 am CET#16
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Tropper wrote on 11/19/2018 at 11:32 AM
I had with LeoVegas about 5 deposits, each with and / or bonus and all went directly to 0, without significant wins, then I locked.
Had a payout of 600€ last week with 10€ ( high was 940€) with Leovegas.
TonioKroeger wrote on 11/18/2018 at 07:53: Addendum and correction, as I can no longer edit above post: Once it was 65% for answer D, "correct" or randomly chosen by the system was then answer A with 14%. Preliminary conclusion: In my opinion, the data say nothing or are misleading.
If the data really correspond to your percentage chance (I'm not sure about that yet), in the long run one lies at e.g.
A: 65%
B: 14%
C: 11%
D: 10%
in 10 attempts 6.5x correct with A - that's not so much. People tend to misjudge percentages - even 80% is not safe, 2 out of 10 tries miss, that's effectively more than it feels and most wouldn't want to play Russian Roulette with two balls in a ten-ball magazine
LG
This post has been translated automatically
B****3
verified
Forum posts:2.680Member has been banned
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
19th Nov. 2018, at 10:45 pm CET#18
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
What kind of head you guys are making ? The discussion is just as hollow as the rtp quota. You can always bet on the smallest percentage and it leads to the same result.
Unfortunately, no one can prove what is right or wrong, but the logical common sense already says that rtp does not exist, and whether answer a b c d is right or wrong. Can sometimes only shake my head
Sometimes I can only "shake my head" at the way people troll here. What is the purpose of the forum? Is it to make fun of others, to blurt out one's supposed knowledge (there are mainly "opinions" here anyway, emotional assessments, rarely scientifically based data that stand up to empirical scrutiny), etc. pp. or is it to address game-specific questions and problems? From the former seems to emanate the comparatively new account (Blubbo33), which has already attracted my attention several times due to its level-less posts and ranting. Above I point out psychological problems with this game or the manipulative character of the percentages of the "audience joker", which in my opinion are not sufficiently clarified in the game description, for example as clearly as the statement in "Extra Chilli" that by gambling you can also lose the won or purchased FS ("Gamble May Result In Loss Of Free Spins" ) or similar. I read in the short description of the new game only: "all answer odds are revealed" and wonder if this is sufficient in view of the numbers. One can of course fatalistically think everything is Manipulation and psychological tricks to confuse the players and arrogantly to precociously recommend not to be so "hollow" to play at all. Whether there are standards (maybe even binding norms) of game manufacturers (I'm not talking about RTP issues, but just suggestive representations etc.), I don't know.
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
I liked it better
This post has been translated automatically
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
I had with LeoVegas about 5 deposits, each with and / or bonus and all went directly to 0, without significant wins, then I locked.
This post has been translated automatically
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
Had a payout of 600€ last week with 10€ ( high was 940€) with Leovegas.
This post has been translated automatically
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
If the data really correspond to your percentage chance (I'm not sure about that yet), in the long run one lies at e.g.
A: 65%
B: 14%
C: 11%
D: 10%
in 10 attempts 6.5x correct with A - that's not so much. People tend to misjudge percentages - even 80% is not safe, 2 out of 10 tries miss, that's effectively more than it feels and most wouldn't want to play Russian Roulette with two balls in a ten-ball magazine
LG
This post has been translated automatically
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
Unfortunately, no one can prove what is right or wrong, but the logical common sense already says that rtp does not exist, and whether answer a b c d is right or wrong. Can sometimes only shake my head
This post has been translated automatically
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
BigTimeGaming "Bonanza 3" release
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically