News & Notices: Topic request for the news section (Page 2)

Hammerdammer wrote on 17/12/2017 at 16:10

1. I myself work as I have already shared in a thread at Telekom. Now imagine, I make a mistake and someone points me out not once, not two or three times but 4,5 or 6 times and that even publicly.

Then these are not even colleagues but customers! ( in this case user of Gamblejoe ) So what do I do now?
If I do not want to harm the company then I take this criticism and improve myself in the future in this area because to ignore it now is the worst possible scenario for the company!

2. I understand that you can't accurately calculate a slot like Bonanza because the potential is endless. You can have infinite multipliers in the free spins and infinite freespins. In other words, there is no limit

With slots like Danger High Voltage or Queen of Riches the situation is different again

Example Danger High Voltage: The highest possible winning pictures are the skulls, namely 125x the bet with a row of 6

Now the slot has 4096 ways. That alone times 125x are already 512,000x bet win possibility with a full screens of the skulls. Now I am not even
not even at the freespins where you could get it x66!!!

Now I ask myself how one comes in Christoph 's article on 20,000x? too lazy times just to look at the paytable and 10 seconds to use the calculator?

I find it very unfortunate that here and also with the other BTG slots numbers have simply been pulled out of their noses and these are sold as fact.

even you have a mistake in thinking about Book of Ra. The highest possible winning picture is not 5000x

It is exactly 7200x.

You get the free spins and as a symbol the explorer. Now 5 explorers run in on the center line. What about the other paylines?
You can also get 5 books in a row on the top row (1400x win) and 5 mummies on the last row (800x win)

I write it specially like this, because I already had free spins with the explorer once and had 4 on the middle line, 4 books on the top and 3 mummies on the bottom. That is still the win from one spin. We ganricht need to talk about when this picture times comes about but the article is about PROFIT POTENTIAL! and it is theoretically possible.

3. I know that Christoph's articles are sometimes written very subjectively and yet these are sold as facts ( Public ) I understand the least. Why does one not write to the fact that these are subjective Meiungen of the article writer? Someone who is not familiar with the matter and seeks information on this site takes this for cash.

4.But what I can't understand is that you don't include the users: It's clear that you can't set up work contracts and hire x users. But here's an example of what I mean:

Vivera also wrote an article on this site. Just for the fun of it. I and many others have often offered you free help which you do not accept. I understand the intention that you would like to reward people for their work and that is perfectly legetim. But why not involve users?

here is a perfect example: You want to write an article about slots and how to win. You write to user xy personally and ask for help. You can offer the user e.g. 50 Euro as Paysafe or something else. So you pay this person and the work is much more accurate, faster and the error rate is minimized. The whole thing could work on an email basis so that people still in the background participate in the thing and take you loads off.

What I only on the death not abkann, is that if someone tries to evade from criticism or to silence this death, therefore this had times out. I myself make enough mistakes in life and at work. But if you do not point it out then I can I never change anything about it.

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel wrote on 17/12/2017 at 17:53:

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Avantgarde83 wrote on 17/12/2017 at 18:35: without wanting to offend anyone: we should start a that/that thread sometime 😀

offtopic, but sick how many people have problems with that, just like with "how/as"

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Avantgarde83 wrote on 17/12/2017 at 18:35: without wanting to offend anyone: we should start a that/that thread sometime 😀

offtopic, but sick how many people have problems with that, just like with "how/as"


as i said: just kidding from me 😇


on topic: find this way with quoting cool too, but wouldn't get it done either...Daniel is a pro!

This post has been translated automatically

Hammerdammer wrote on 17.12.2017 at 18:48

Avantgarde83 wrote on 17/12/2017 at 18:35: without wanting to offend anyone: we should start a that/that thread sometime 😀

offtopic, but sick how many people have problems with that, just like with "how/as"

That makes my phone or autocorrect unfortunately by itself. I know the rule with that/that

I just do not pay so much attention to my spelling on the net. But I'll try harder in the future

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

vivera365 wrote on 17.12.2017 at 19:08: Hammer get the consecrated silver bullets ready - the two become WerLehrer...... ðŸ'¿

This post has been translated automatically