what is it about now from 25.05. ? --> please briefly and concisely key points
i am being nagged from all possible sides incl. oc to confirm something.
read through all this only because it brings almost no one on the series only to communicate the change is too long for me
thought I ask times you here if someone knows about it.
thank you and please only informative on the subject
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
the DSVGO
21st May. 2018, at 09:49 pm CEST#2
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Any storage of user-specific data requires consent in the EU and is tied to certain things. That's short and sweet. You just have to consent...
These are just stupid, new data protection laws from people who have no idea about the internet and the technology behind it and just create a lot of bureaucracy. It is also money-making or job creation measures for relatively useless people - such as lawyers and data protection officers. For example, companies with as few as 10 employees must now hire a data protection officer or employ one externally. Some small to medium-sized companies will have to cope with this and some may even perish as a result.
This is also the reason why we are less active, because we have to take care of this nonsense and should have implemented it by the end of the week ...
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
the DSVGO
21st May. 2018, at 10:27 pm CEST#4
1 Like
Liked this post: J****r
So it is . In our company / station there are 11 EDP workstations - for months we have been looking for a way to reduce them to 9. So far without success. The financial expenses for a data protection officer are insane - basically a useless but highly paid job is generated.
Daniel wrote on 05/21/2018 at 22:02: These are just stupid new privacy laws from people who have no idea about internet and the technology behind it and just makes for a lot of bureaucracy. It is also money-making or job creation measures for relatively useless people - like lawyers and data protection officers. For example, companies with as few as 10 employees must now hire a data protection officer or employ one externally. Some small to medium-sized companies will have to cope with this and some may even perish as a result.
This is also the reason why we are less active, because we have to take care of this bullshit and should have implemented it by the end of the week ...
Not entirely true. I happen to be involved in a church association and of course we have problems with the new data protection law. As far as I know, a company only has to employ a data protection officer if 10 or more employees work with the data, have access to it etc. or if it is particularly sensitive data such as illnesses.
I heard a lot of other stupid stuff with imprint and privacy policy on every website and signatures in mails, then it was too boring for me and I didn't really listen anymore. However, the law has already been in place for 2 years, it only comes into force on the 25th. Enough time was actually for all businesses, associations, etc. there.
I would like to briefly answer your question Iseedeadpeople..., but I will later comment comprehensively on the subject of data protection on GambleJoe.
Basically, the topic of data protection should of course play an important role in every company and also at GambleJoe we have paid attention from the beginning,
that user data cannot/should not fall into the wrong hands and that we do not pass on or sell the data to third parties.
Fundamental
1. Privacy by Design = encrypt user data, do not collect data that is not absolutely necessary (we already do this)
2. Secure the areas where unencrypted data is used, so that the data does not get lost / correct destruction of documents and data, encryption of hard drives, protection of all company computers through various security measures. (we already do)
3. as written above, store only the data you really need and educate the user about it. Comply with the right to delete personal data. (we already do this)
Overall, GambleJoe has been DSVGO compliant for a long time, but it's true what Daniel says, we are still internally improving a few workflows and issues on the website.
soon every member will have to accept the new privacy policy and terms of use. But fundamentally nothing will change, because we generally work very open and transparent.
This DSVGO still costs me the last nerve. I would now have to update up to 38 websites or bring them up to date. For a "one-man business" this is already a lot of work...
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
the DSVGO
22nd May. 2018, at 02:43 pm CEST#8
1 Like
Liked this post: J****r
In this way, they want blogs and new media to disappear from the scene once and for all.
Our freedom is threatened at all levels. It's high time that we finally rid ourselves of these wretched communists.
the DSVGO
Nobody has liked this post so far
i am being nagged from all possible sides incl. oc to confirm something.
read through all this only because it brings almost no one on the series only to communicate the change is too long for me
thought I ask times you here if someone knows about it.
thank you and please only informative on the subject
This post has been translated automatically
the DSVGO
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
the DSVGO
Liked this post: J****r
This is also the reason why we are less active, because we have to take care of this nonsense and should have implemented it by the end of the week ...
This post has been translated automatically
the DSVGO
Liked this post: J****r
This post has been translated automatically
the DSVGO
Nobody has liked this post so far
Not entirely true. I happen to be involved in a church association and of course we have problems with the new data protection law. As far as I know, a company only has to employ a data protection officer if 10 or more employees work with the data, have access to it etc. or if it is particularly sensitive data such as illnesses.
I heard a lot of other stupid stuff with imprint and privacy policy on every website and signatures in mails, then it was too boring for me and I didn't really listen anymore. However, the law has already been in place for 2 years, it only comes into force on the 25th. Enough time was actually for all businesses, associations, etc. there.
This post has been translated automatically
the DSVGO
Liked this post: J****r
Basically, the topic of data protection should of course play an important role in every company and also at GambleJoe we have paid attention from the beginning,
that user data cannot/should not fall into the wrong hands and that we do not pass on or sell the data to third parties.
Fundamental
1. Privacy by Design = encrypt user data, do not collect data that is not absolutely necessary (we already do this)
2. Secure the areas where unencrypted data is used, so that the data does not get lost / correct destruction of documents and data, encryption of hard drives, protection of all company computers through various security measures. (we already do)
3. as written above, store only the data you really need and educate the user about it. Comply with the right to delete personal data. (we already do this)
Overall, GambleJoe has been DSVGO compliant for a long time, but it's true what Daniel says, we are still internally improving a few workflows and issues on the website.
soon every member will have to accept the new privacy policy and terms of use. But fundamentally nothing will change, because we generally work very open and transparent.
This post has been translated automatically
the DSVGO
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
the DSVGO
Liked this post: J****r
Our freedom is threatened at all levels. It's high time that we finally rid ourselves of these wretched communists.
This post has been translated automatically