News & Notices: Paysafecard lottery March 2019 - The winners have been determined! (Page 12)

Insa24 wrote on 04/03/2019 at 09:09
I think it is precisely because GJ has so many registered users and it has become so confusing due to new registrations à la "Dumdidumringer" (or what was his name, with the 4 accounts here, who participated in the lottery on every account) that they have increased the score from 500 to 750.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

thelastgambler wrote on 03/02/2019 08:01: Thanks to the operators for the action - made my day again!!!!

I find the discussions about the 25€ cards always cool and really amusing. Which human abysses show up - wonderful. Do you actually rent your portal to any universities for study purposes? Would certainly be a good source of income! I would do it if it belonged to me


But I would not let me as PSC distributing operator so ampampen "you burn probably the helmet say times..." - for such thing I would pronounce immediately ne warning and lock - but also that is not my can. Joa mei and that comes from the user who actually always criticizes the poor level ... perfecto, cool morning.



Best Quote Ever!!!! 16 hours passed and still there. That's what I call consistent. Otherwise I know only teens with such sayings and without consequences :-I can no longer. I wonder slowly here, why always announcements come and everything runs in the sand - this is just cool. I'm almost under the table .... Oh ... man ... that must be already ne kind of addiction, if one finds a portal to run away and cannot go


By the way I also googled "free paysafe card". There I found an article from 2017 on the 2 page below - there has been no reference to a monthly lottery. So I don't think so many scroungers will come at the search group - there were better results on the first places. But the fear is always omnipresent

Even better I find the division of GJ into 2 classes - the good and old regular users and the new PSC-haves. Do new users actually have the chance to move up to the new class? And if it would be fixed on a higher score, wouldn't it challenge spamming again? It was like that in the early days, when everyone wanted to be number 1. The attacks among each other were also wonderful back then - ide often saved my day

But the proposal is cool too. f**k equality and equal chances - like Stammis want to win, we need better chances!!!!
No matter what impression it makes on outsiders, first demand a 2 class society and put all new users under general suspicion that they only come because of PSCs

Tell me is not it a normal thing in the forum that you help each other? I have never seen that at gutefrage or so someone has demanded money for good answers - but well I do not see everything there - is not as exciting as here

Can you guys tell me who in the list didn't deserve the win? I have seen all users before somehow. Be it winning pictures, videos or casino reviews. Not all of them are active in the forum, but I don't think they have to be - there are enough other features on the site. In the funny discussions I interfere only rarely, wobie sometimes I can not leave it

Especially since also regular users have won like dumdumurindanger gagapapamama AceOfSpades Skitch22 redriver67 tby Bvb1995 or do they not belong to the illustrious circle of stammis? Maybe you should make a poll, who is considered a good old regular user are then only a handful who would always get a PSC

Many Dnak for the start in the day - you made my weekend bruvs!!!!

tby

AceOfSpadesSkitch22tby

This post has been translated automatically

SevenEleven wrote on 03/04/2019 10:35 AM

*g* I have you to thank for (m)one first - namely the first time I clicked "thumbs up" here. Was fun to read, thelastgambler. Thanks for that.


Otherwise:
Even if I find this "too bad, I was not among the winners this time" - complaining basically perverse and highly unsympathetic - I still like to read these human abysses of the "Mia san Mimimi" faction. And this time the draw had even extra pepper because of the strange two-class proposal. Conclusion: Unfortunately cool, how some make themselves here humanly totally naked - and that because of a 25'er PSC. Actually unbelievable, but in the sense of q.e.d. true. *g*

@GambleJoe-Team: I think you should draw the cards in the next month exclusively among new users.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Bone wrote on 04.03.2019 at 13:31: With the discussions comes with me already a strong suspicion. Namely that some here are probably actually registered primarily because of the PSC card lottery. I am of course also happy when I win a card to gamble. But it is a raffle and no form of earnings. It doesn't matter if someone gives advice to half of the community and writes 10 great comments a day. It is a lottery and not a form of profit sharing in the success of GJ. I'm always happy when I win and I'm also annoyed when I lose, for about 10 seconds, then life goes on. I get annoyed, but I am not jealous towards a user who posts less comments and won a PSC "in my place". I find that form of resentment base. No one here has more right to win at a WIN than another. I don't go to the arcade and complain that the guy next to me who I've never seen here wins even though I carried so much more money into the Spielo, do I? Some should just stop seeing this lottery as some kind of favor towards their "performance" in the forum. Otherwise some users with a lot of contributions would be disqualified anyway because of low quality.

This post has been translated automatically

Cryptique wrote on 04/03/2019 at 15:53

Yes bone, you are really a very ethical person!

Small note on the side: Some people believe their hypocrisy is a halo ....

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Counter wrote on 03/04/2019 08:33 AM
Good morning Marques,

thank you for your constructive suggestion. That makes it come across quite differently.
Ok, let's assume the following:
We change the lottery and work in 2 steps. Once a Pot from "regular users" and once a pot from "normal/new users".
Then that would be 2 passes in the lottery and there would be 20 tickets drawn.

Now user xyz sits in front of the screen and looks at the available names in the "regular user" prize pot. And does not find itself
Is now however the opinion with its contributions in the last months definitely to belong to it. Even if these vllt only more or less from hardly more than 4 words consisted, but nevertheless. And already the excitement starts again from the beginning.

Even if we determine the "regular users" mathematically from the factors forum affiliation and the number of postings, that says nothing about the meaningfulness of the contributions concerned. This is usually in the eye of the beholder. If we still include the likes, then I could imagine that it then comes to various "like groups".

So it would be possible again only with a human component. That could then mean that we decide who is "regular user" and makes meaningful contributions? I think that can not be the point of the matter and would definitely bring more unrest.

And what happens if the pot of "regular users" suddenly becomes much larger (number of users) than the pot of "normal/new users"? Then a new regulation would have to be found again, because there would certainly be complaints from this "pot" that they would have a lower chance to win

I hope I could show you with these morning thoughts why there is no really simple solution for this PSC issue. No matter how we do it, someone will find it wrong and unfair. That's why at the moment it's really just a lottery where everyone has an equal chance (above a certain minimum activity - which is above just logging in).

By the way, there are users here who write less (sometimes without a single forum post), but contribute many winning pictures, videos, comments or other things. But these are also among the oldest users in our community. As I said, it is not easy to determine who is a "regular user".

This post has been translated automatically