Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

News & Notices: Paysafecard lottery December 2019 - The winners have been determined! (Page 6)

Topic created on 01st Dec. 2019 | Page: 6 of 8 | Answers: 77 | Views: 12,877
upola
Legend
I have not won for 12 months.
But if I win again statistically, that gives me hope

This post has been translated automatically

Skitch22
Elite
Bone wrote on 01.12.2019 at 19:20: I have also not won for 9 months The probability is also getting smaller, finally people come to it. It's okay, statistically speaking, I will win again one day.

For 9 months ? so you are probably the only record holder, I thought my 5 times are a lot

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
Skitch22 wrote at 19:27 on 01 Dec 2019
For 9 months ? I guess that makes you the sole record holder then, I thought my 5 times was a lot.

I'm not 100% sure at all. I think it was the February lottery, but maybe March. But I won in the Mega lottery. And I don't use this portal to win PSC. It's a little incentive, but not the main motivation. So it's okay that others win. Surely everyone is happy about it

This post has been translated automatically

DaseR92
Amateur
Congratulations to the winners, and good luck to all next time

This post has been translated automatically

rcore
Experienced
Many thanks for the PSC!

This post has been translated automatically

DrPepper
Amateur
Kleinkariert wrote on 01/12/2019 at 18:33
So even though I actively participate in the forum I am disadvantaged just because I don't send in a picture of myself? Maybe the PSC will even motivate me?

You have 93 posts in the forum, 31 of them in lottery/PSC threads. And a part in <Wir holen dein Geld zurück>where you argue that even casinos are not always moral, overall a huge part in bug/VS threads or that it does not run. So overall a user that only comes when it's about letting off steam or there is something to win. You can see that in your post history.

And now please explain to me in what way you should be more entitled to many users who are vllt. not verified here but clearly do more for the community and players, just because of your submission of the picture? Compared to the real activity the sending of the picture is actually as you say a trifle.

If it bothers you, you can still do without the lottery and don't have to be upset that you didn't win again.

What disadvantages do you have in the FORUM if you do not send a picture? What's wrong with my contribution history? Am I not allowed to take these contests because I post less than you do? It is not about the authorization who or what when someone has earned but it is about avoiding the double accounts are created to be able to participate in the lottery. Everyone may participate in this action and I think that's good! However, I am for the rule that it is just only verified members may...because EVERYONE has just the opportunity to verify.
I think you just do not want this rule for non-verified members, because there probably then your second and third accounts go down the drain...one notices correctly that I have hit there nen point with you Affected dogs bark as is well known. And that's why I hope that this regulation will come sooner or later.
You do just as little for the community here in the forum. From you come mostly only posts where you attack people, provoke and and insult and we both had already once the pleasure.</Wir>

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
DrPepper wrote on Dec 01, 2019 at 7:52 pm
What disadvantages do you have in the FORUM if you don't send a picture? What's objectionable about my posting history? Am I not allowed to take these sweepstakes because I post less than you do? It is not about the authorization who or what when someone has earned but it is about avoiding the double accounts are created to be able to participate in the lottery. Everyone may participate in this action and I think that's good! However, I am for the rule that it is just only verified members may...because EVERYONE has just the opportunity to verify.
I think you just do not want this rule for non-verified members, because there probably then your second and third accounts go down the drain...one notices correctly that I have hit there nen point with you Affected dogs bark as is well known. And that's why I hope that this regulation will come sooner or later.
You do just as little for the community here in the forum. From you come mostly only posts where you attack people, provoke and and insult and we both had already once the pleasure.

What makes you think that people with duplicate accounts have won? I'm sure this has happened in the past at some point, but I actually thought GJ had banned some accounts

Also, I'd like to point out that you're not verified either.

I'd also like to point out that the current form of Verification here wouldn't rule out duplicate accounts either

This post has been translated automatically

DrPepper
Amateur
Bone wrote on 12/01/2019 at 7:55 pm
Where do you even get the idea that people with duplicate accoutns won? I'm sure it's happened at some point in the past, but I actually thought GJ had banned some accounts

Also, I'd like to point out that you're not verified either.

I'd also like to point out that the current form of Verification here wouldn't rule out duplicate accounts either.

Yes, it has happened in the past, but because now some are banned, it does not mean that not all are banned or can not be created new

Right, but have also written in the other post that I would do this of course, if it would be a prerequisite for participation in the actions.

But it would, as far as I know you have to upload a picture with a note in the hand on the username is. Every member who wants to verify himself will be checked. Disadvantage of the thing is the pictures would have to be parked just longer somewhere to be able to match at the end with the new verification requests... And there I do not know to what extent that would be compatible with data protection because I do not know me so well.

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon

DrPepper wrote on Dec 01, 2019 at 7:52 pm
What disadvantages do you have in the FORUM if you don't send a picture? What's objectionable about my posting history? Am I not allowed to take these sweepstakes because I post less than you do? It is not about the authorization who or what when someone has earned but it is about avoiding the double accounts are created to be able to participate in the lottery. Everyone may participate in this action and I think that's good! However, I am for the rule that it is just only verified members may...because EVERYONE has just the opportunity to verify.
I think you just do not want this rule for non-verified members, because there probably then your second and third accounts go down the drain...one notices correctly that I have hit there nen point with you Affected dogs bark as is well known. And that's why I hope that this regulation will come sooner or later.
You do just as little for the community here in the forum. From you come mostly only posts where you attack people, provoke and and insult and we both had already once the pleasure.

I think times about this contribution of you will laugh Kleinkariert also. So I have now laughed about what you reproach him there and me earlier also with double account. By the way, I had already written an example in the forum, how easy it would be for a person to create several accounts here. Since I wrote it must only someone 5 buddies such the hold all a note firmly with Gamblejoe and damm with note and face abfotografiert.schon is a Verification with 5 emails and 5 accounts loosely created and there I had got right from Matthias. As long as one does not make that with Perso, this kind of verification is not really watertight. That's just a side note, because you are now so high on this topic.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
DrPepper wrote on 01.12.2019 at 20:04
Yes it has happened many times in the past, but because some are banned now doesn't mean that not all are banned or new ones can't be created

Right, but have also written in the other post that I would do this of course if it were a requirement for participation in the actions.

But it would, as far as I know you have to upload a picture with a note in the hand on the username is. Every member who wants to verify himself will be checked. Disadvantage of the thing is the pictures would have to be parked just longer somewhere to be able to match at the end with the new Verification requests... And there I do not know to what extent that would be compatible with data protection because I do not know me so well.

You are addressing exactly the problem. The images are sifted and deleted directly, for data protection reasons. That is, if not always the same person looks at the pictures and this person also has an incredible memory for faces, only the hurdle of verification is a security mechanism, the verification itself but hardly

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Dec. 2024 at 05:00 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately