News & Notices: Paysafecard lottery December 2019 - The winners have been determined! (Page 6)

This post has been translated automatically

Bone wrote on 01.12.2019 at 19:20: I have also not won for 9 months The probability is also getting smaller, finally people come to it. It's okay, statistically speaking, I will win again one day.

This post has been translated automatically

Skitch22 wrote at 19:27 on 01 Dec 2019
For 9 months ? I guess that makes you the sole record holder then, I thought my 5 times was a lot.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert wrote on 01/12/2019 at 18:33
So even though I actively participate in the forum I am disadvantaged just because I don't send in a picture of myself? Maybe the PSC will even motivate me?

You have 93 posts in the forum, 31 of them in lottery/PSC threads. And a part in <Wir holen dein Geld zurück>where you argue that even casinos are not always moral, overall a huge part in bug/VS threads or that it does not run. So overall a user that only comes when it's about letting off steam or there is something to win. You can see that in your post history.

And now please explain to me in what way you should be more entitled to many users who are vllt. not verified here but clearly do more for the community and players, just because of your submission of the picture? Compared to the real activity the sending of the picture is actually as you say a trifle.

If it bothers you, you can still do without the lottery and don't have to be upset that you didn't win again.

This post has been translated automatically

DrPepper wrote on Dec 01, 2019 at 7:52 pm
What disadvantages do you have in the FORUM if you don't send a picture? What's objectionable about my posting history? Am I not allowed to take these sweepstakes because I post less than you do? It is not about the authorization who or what when someone has earned but it is about avoiding the double accounts are created to be able to participate in the lottery. Everyone may participate in this action and I think that's good! However, I am for the rule that it is just only verified members may...because EVERYONE has just the opportunity to verify.
I think you just do not want this rule for non-verified members, because there probably then your second and third accounts go down the drain...one notices correctly that I have hit there nen point with you Affected dogs bark as is well known. And that's why I hope that this regulation will come sooner or later.
You do just as little for the community here in the forum. From you come mostly only posts where you attack people, provoke and and insult and we both had already once the pleasure.

This post has been translated automatically

Bone wrote on 12/01/2019 at 7:55 pm
Where do you even get the idea that people with duplicate accoutns won? I'm sure it's happened at some point in the past, but I actually thought GJ had banned some accounts

Also, I'd like to point out that you're not verified either.

I'd also like to point out that the current form of Verification here wouldn't rule out duplicate accounts either.

This post has been translated automatically

DrPepper wrote on Dec 01, 2019 at 7:52 pm
What disadvantages do you have in the FORUM if you don't send a picture? What's objectionable about my posting history? Am I not allowed to take these sweepstakes because I post less than you do? It is not about the authorization who or what when someone has earned but it is about avoiding the double accounts are created to be able to participate in the lottery. Everyone may participate in this action and I think that's good! However, I am for the rule that it is just only verified members may...because EVERYONE has just the opportunity to verify.
I think you just do not want this rule for non-verified members, because there probably then your second and third accounts go down the drain...one notices correctly that I have hit there nen point with you Affected dogs bark as is well known. And that's why I hope that this regulation will come sooner or later.
You do just as little for the community here in the forum. From you come mostly only posts where you attack people, provoke and and insult and we both had already once the pleasure.

This post has been translated automatically

DrPepper wrote on 01.12.2019 at 20:04
Yes it has happened many times in the past, but because some are banned now doesn't mean that not all are banned or new ones can't be created

Right, but have also written in the other post that I would do this of course if it were a requirement for participation in the actions.

But it would, as far as I know you have to upload a picture with a note in the hand on the username is. Every member who wants to verify himself will be checked. Disadvantage of the thing is the pictures would have to be parked just longer somewhere to be able to match at the end with the new Verification requests... And there I do not know to what extent that would be compatible with data protection because I do not know me so well.

This post has been translated automatically