Bone wrote on 09/30/2023 at 10:28 AM: I wondered many years ago how many duplicate and triplicate accounts were floating around here simply to enter the monthly lottery.
Now that there is a calculable source of PSC, the situation is unlikely to have improved. I have no idea how GJ ensures that there are no freeloaders skimming money with multiple accounts.
This built-in hurdle in the form of a minimum number of posts suggests to me that it is technically impossible to safely expose duplicate accounts.
So this is probably a "better than nothing" solution.
So I can reveal this much, that we already have a good (technology based) system that detects multiaccounts. The users in question have verified themselves so cleverly with photos that there was no doubt at all at the beginning, because "one" simply does not expect such a thing - for a 10 € Paysafecard.
The balance between the deserved reward to our community and the users who may not have deserved it is right in my opinion. Even if I am always amazed at my workload the day before the monthly raffle
So I can reveal so much that we already have a good (technology-based) system that detects multiaccounts. But the said users have verified themselves so cleverly with photos that at the beginning there was no doubt at all, because "one" simply does not expect something like that - for a 10 € Paysafecard.
The balance between the deserved reward to our community and the users who may not have deserved it is right in my opinion. Even if I'm always amazed about my work volume on the day before the monthly raffle
The fact that members (including me) collect their last points the day before the monthly raffle to be able to participate is another story. There is no intention to cheat behind this.
You always have to keep in mind that a missed monthly drawing means that the next one is gone as well. If then the good resolution to be more active again next month kicks in, then I find that understandable.
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
30th Sep. 2023, at 04:51 pm CEST#224
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 30/09/2023 at 13:06:
The fact that members (including me) collect their last points the day before the monthly raffle to be able to participate is another story. There is no intent to defraud behind this.
You also always have to keep in mind that one missed monthly raffle means the next one is also down the drain. If then the good resolution to be more active in the next month kicks, then I find that understandable.
Is also I think times normal that one collects times at the last minute points, I do this month so, there are just months where you can not be so active by things like vacation, illness, private or the like, and know that it will be more again in the future.
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
30th Sep. 2023, at 07:53 pm CEST#225
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
I would find it more valuable in the sense of a meaningful forum to contribute something when you have something to contribute and not when you need the points But I do not care...from me can also participate with pleasure 1246 members
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
30th Sep. 2023, at 09:41 pm CEST#226
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Langhans wrote on 30.09.2023 at 19:53: I would find it yes in the sense of a contentful forum more valuable to contribute something when you have something to contribute and not when you need the points But I do not care...from me can participate there also gladly 1246 members
You're right, but I still don't write completely inane posts.
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
30th Sep. 2023, at 11:01 pm CEST#227
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 09/30/2023 at 9:41 pm:
You're right, but I still don't write completely inane posts.
Was also not at all aimed at you, but a general assessment of the situation I must confess, however, nevertheless, that I have noticed your name before, but somehow no contribution But that must be somehow an error (with me), because you have already over 2,000. Besides, it is not for me anyway to evaluate the contributions of other users qualitatively
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post: garfield68
So I can reveal this much, that we already have a good (technology based) system that detects multiaccounts. The users in question have verified themselves so cleverly with photos that there was no doubt at all at the beginning, because "one" simply does not expect such a thing - for a 10 € Paysafecard.
The balance between the deserved reward to our community and the users who may not have deserved it is right in my opinion. Even if I am always amazed at my workload the day before the monthly raffle
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Liked this post: BinGOLDiG, roccoammo11
The fact that members (including me) collect their last points the day before the monthly raffle to be able to participate is another story. There is no intention to cheat behind this.
You always have to keep in mind that a missed monthly drawing means that the next one is gone as well. If then the good resolution to be more active again next month kicks in, then I find that understandable.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
Is also I think times normal that one collects times at the last minute points, I do this month so, there are just months where you can not be so active by things like vacation, illness, private or the like, and know that it will be more again in the future.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
You're right, but I still don't write completely inane posts.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
Was also not at all aimed at you, but a general assessment of the situation I must confess, however, nevertheless, that I have noticed your name before, but somehow no contribution But that must be somehow an error (with me), because you have already over 2,000. Besides, it is not for me anyway to evaluate the contributions of other users qualitatively
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe action: remuneration for gambling reviews
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hey musaberkcam,
Seems like you misunderstood the whole thing here
As Matthias already wrote on page 1: it is the Spielotheken reviews for which it has its own subpage.
This post has been translated automatically