Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

News & Notices: GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary) (Page 8)

Topic created on 18th Sep. 2019 | Page: 8 of 15 | Answers: 146 | Views: 30,800
sippi
Expert
I still do not quite understand how you want to counteract double accounts. I mean, a photo of who else can make but everyone for the fake account? Well, be that as it may, I will not verify myself, think that's nonsense.

This post has been translated automatically

x****Y
Bones wrote on 09/20/2019 at 16:03
But this regulation does not take place so yes. And after the strained protestations that Verification is absolutely voluntary, I don't think it will come into effect in the future either.

would still be voluntary those who do not want to, still do not have to do it

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie
Elite
Dagmarlena wrote on 20/09/2019 at 16:01
therefore yes, participation in sweepstakes only for verified members

This measure would also be the only reason to get verified.
I would do it then as well
Would not make the hurdle for double accounts insurmountable, but already more difficult.
But only to have a purple banner under the name. I find pointless.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Kochen would have no chance of Verification anyway, I'm afraid. With Knochen`s milksop face, no one would believe that he is 18.

Take the advantages of a verification to the wide expanses of the forum, so that the damned (those with the double account) may crawl into their holes and never again see the daylight of this truly wonderful gambling world!

This post has been translated automatically

Daniel
Elite
Well, I personally think that Verification is also rather semi-sensible. Agreed with the idea and the implementation though, as long as it's voluntary and doesn't offer any disadvantages if you don't do it. The "verify" does not serve us, but it is mainly for you.

Many have complained here that they may be talking to duplicate accounts. If a member is verified, you have a slightly higher assurance of conversing with a real person who at least once submitted a photo. That's basically it.

This post has been translated automatically

S****8
Dagmarlena wrote on 20/09/2019 at 16:01
therefore yes, participation in sweepstakes only for verified members

you write a nonsense !
but apparently you are yes only therefore on GJ ?

This post has been translated automatically

S****8
Totoro wrote on 20.09.2019 at 16:23: Kochen would have no chance of Verification anyway I fear. With Knochen`s milquetoast face, no one would believe he is 18 after all.

Carry the benefits of verification into the vastness of the forum, so that the damned (those with the double account) may crawl into their holes and never again see the light of day of this truly wonderful gambling world!

we get it ... OMG

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Sweep88 wrote on 09/20/2019 at 5:28 pm
you write a bullshit !
but apparently that's the only reason you are on GJ ?

in no other forum are so many bad-tempered people on the road... bad day had?

This post has been translated automatically

g****s
People will already be hoping that the whole thing will be rewarded with a PSC

Everything is done for greed anyway.

It is no real protection, and therefore questionable anyway

This post has been translated automatically

S****8
redfoxx wrote at 6:50pm on 2019-09-20
no other forum has so many bad tempered people on it... had a bad day?

nope how so ?

Because I write my opinion ? how I think ?

Look I'm already since 2017 ...there were still quite other users on the road...who have made this all big!

it was somehow different ...

many have unfortunately deleted and not without reason !

The last Stammi ...Luido aka Ronny ...unfortunately . ( hope you read this )

Since the introduction of this PSC action, it came but only to the (alleged) double accounts ...

And Gruendels has somehow right ...

So nix bad day

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 01:03 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately