Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

News & Notices: GambleJoe: New verification function (voluntary) (Page 7)

Topic created on 18th Sep. 2019 | Page: 7 of 15 | Answers: 146 | Views: 31,299
x****Y
Gamer777 wrote on 09/20/2019 11:48 AM
Yes but some meant yes probably here equal nen ID with to upload...... ... .
Well, nevertheless, the sense is so a forum here the absolute anonymity and that is then no longer necessarily given.
Just my opinion - everyone can do as he wants...... ... .

well, hundreds of people see your face every day, as long as you go out sometimes. the rest is your username (which everyone here sees) the current date (everyone should know) and that this forum is called gamblejoe (everyone here should also know)

i don't see why anonymity is endangered here? Especially in every dirty casino people upload perso, invoices, credit card, online banking screenshot, bank statements etc.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Totoro wrote on 20.09.2019 at 11:56 am: Exactly, the GJ team just wants a picture of your pretty face and a white piece of paper with a few letters on it. There beckons as a reward a "verified" and your salvation incl. later "Fastlane treatment" at the pearly gates.

The salvation of the soul - thus the soul freed from sins and redeemed - to promise now by the Verification (of the physical shell) in a gambling forum of all things: all sorts! ^^

This post has been translated automatically

Matthias
Expert
So since I'm verified here, I also already feel much freer from the burden of my gambling sins

This post has been translated automatically

Christian1337
Experienced
So as long as there is no added value I will not do it unfortunately.

The purpose pursued (I think like the majority here) is not achieved. On the one hand because unverified members can participate in the lottery, on the other hand because a picture with Gamblejoe name brings you felt nothing.

Why not verify yourself as in Online Casinos with Perso + utility bill?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Matthias wrote on 09/20/2019 12:21 PM: So since I'm verified here, I also already feel much freer from the burden of my gambling sins

Behold my brothers and sisters. Miracle! Matthias has been released from his torment. Get verified today and join the circle of the liberated!

This post has been translated automatically

Dagmarlena
Experienced
So I have now also confirmed my "authenticity as a unique piece"!
(priceless&simply incorrigible😉✌😂)

SO I THINK THE Verification IS GOOD AND HONESTLY, I THINK IT SHOULD ALSO ONLY VERIFIED MEMBERS PARTICIPATE IN THE SWEEPSTAKES!

FROM GAMBLEJOE ALSO EXPECTS EVERYONE WHO PARTICIPATES, THAT THE DRAWS ARE CORRECT AND FAIR FROM HAPPENING - ERGO ->VERIFIED = FAIRNESS TOWARDS ALL MEMBERS

1. IS THE ETERNAL SORROW TOPIC "DOUBLE ACCOUNT" DONE

2. ONE IS SOMETHING MORE, ON THE SAFE SIDE WHAT THE FULL YEAR LIFE MEANS (milk faces excluded, laugh)

3. HAVE AS GOOD AS ANY CASINO PLAYER PUT OUT HIS FULL AND SIGNIFICANTLY DETAILED DATA (which could be more likely to be used for shenanigans) TO ALL POSSIBLE WEB SITES.

... .besides, no one sees how "schrorr" one is because the because => is deleted afterwards the proof picture... 😂😉

... just my opinion.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
I will probably verify myself at some point, but I don't think it will be of much use. How a completely voluntary Verification of this kind should prevent double accounts is beyond me. You could still easily have one verified account and 4 unverified ones? You could probably even trick the GJ team and verify multiple accounts. Do you really remember for weeks/months how each verified user looked like? Does the same person always control the pictures?

Would a decent verification with ID have been too difficult or legally impossible or why do you make such a half-baked thing out of it? Do verified members actually have any advantages over others?

The approach is certainly correct, but the implementation is questionable

This post has been translated automatically

x****Y
Bone wrote on 09/20/2019 at 15:48: While I will probably still verify at some point, I don't think it will be of much use either. How a completely voluntary Verification of this kind is supposed to prevent duplicate accounts is beyond me. You could still easily have one verified account and 4 unverified ones? You could probably even trick the GJ team and verify multiple accounts. Do you really remember for weeks/months how each verified user looked like? Does the same person always control the pictures?

Would a decent verification with ID have been too difficult or legally impossible or why do you make such a half-baked thing out of it? Do verified members actually have any advantages over others?

The approach is certainly correct, but the implementation is questionable.

+1

This post has been translated automatically

Dagmarlena
Experienced
Bone wrote on 09/20/2019 at 15:48: While I will probably still verify at some point, I don't think it will be of much use either. How a completely voluntary Verification of this sort is supposed to prevent duplicate accounts is beyond me. You could still easily have one verified account and 4 unverified ones? You could probably even trick the GJ team and verify multiple accounts. Do you really remember for weeks/months how each verified user looked like? Does the same person always control the pictures?

Would a decent verification with ID have been too difficult or legally impossible or why do you make such a half-baked thing out of it? Do verified members actually have any advantages over others?

The approach is certainly correct, but the implementation is questionable.

therefore yes, participation in raffles only for verified members

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
Dagmarlena wrote on 20/09/2019 at 16:01
therefore yes, participation in sweepstakes only for verified members

But this regulation does not take place so yes. And after the strained protestations that the Verification is absolutely voluntary, I also do not believe that this will come into force in the future

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Dec. 2024 at 12:40 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately