Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Winning pictures

Topic created on 15th Sep. 2018 | Page: 1 of 6 | Answers: 51 | Views: 11,420
bruffl
Expert
Moin,

i know I am still quite new here in the forum,
i also like to look at the winning pictures / videos.
But I find it a bit ridiculous to post winning pictures with a 20x factor.
Can not regulate it so that, for example, only from 200x or 500x can be published?

Thanks

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
bruffl wrote on 09/15/2018 at 10:41 am: Moin,

i know I am still quite new here on the forum,
i also like to look at the winning pictures / videos.
But I find it a bit ridiculous to post winning pictures with a 20x factor.
Can you not regulate it so that, for example, only from 200x or 500x can be published?

Thanks

I have to agree with you, I think that it is due to the fact that people want to collect points for the PSC - lottery

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I also think the pictures should be checked before publication. These klecker winning pictures are a joke and are simply uploaded to collect points

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
bruffl wrote on 09/15/2018 at 10:41 am: Moin,

i know, I am still quite new here in the forum,
i also like to look at the winning pictures / videos.
But I find it a bit ridiculous to post winning pictures with a 20x factor.
Can you not regulate it so that, for example, only from 200x or 500x can be published?

Thanks

But how should you publish your great donuts winning pictures, where you have a really high Multiplier, but the win is 0,-?

I would be if then for a restriction from 100x, 100x images come in part already (for me) quite rare^^

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
You can sort the winning pictures by winning factor, but yes x20 is a bit low. But I think that also low winning pictures should be published, but only winning pictures that meet one of the following conditions:

- Win is higher than 1000 €
- Win factor is at least 100x

bring you points on Gamblejoe. This alone would reduce the number of such images. What would also be nice the images with "unknown" as a factor stands should be reworked at some point.

This post has been translated automatically

Simbda
Top Member
I think you should go by the factor. So from 100x. Everyone plays differently. The one 0,10€ the other 10€.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
So when the Psc was still awarded according to the amount of points, and was not raffled among the active, there are really far too many "small" winning pictures have been uploaded.Da I would have also wanted a minimum age, or I did at that time.
Mitlerweile are but almost only reasonable actually, apart from a few exceptions.
A minimum weight of x100 oä would certainly not damage, but with the manageable amount at the moment actually not absolutely necessary.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Join me. Am also for winning pictures only from at least x100 or 100 euros to upload

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Stromberg wrote on 15.09.2018 at 11:12: So when the Psc was still awarded according to the amount of points, and was not raffled among the active, there are really far too many "small" winning pictures have been uploaded.Since I would also have liked a minimum age, or I did at the time.
Mitlerweile are but almost only reasonable actually, apart from a few exceptions.
A minimum weight of x100 oä would certainly not damage, but with the manageable amount at the moment actually not absolutely necessary.


I meant of course not minimum age and minimum weight...?

This post has been translated automatically

T0uchTheSky
Elite
Winning pictures should be something special, under 100x makes no sense and produces too much garbage here. I am more for win from 200x.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Dec. 2024 at 08:55 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately