Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: why is your casino blacklist so short...in my eyes this is gross negligence (Page 2)

Topic created on 25th Oct. 2019 | Page: 2 of 2 | Answers: 17 | Views: 5,359
Anonym
Latino wrote on 10/26/2019 08:39
I would even welcome a greylist here in which all casinos are listed that use reduced RTP versions.Plus a downranking by 20 places in the casino comparison.

i think this is a very good idea.

This post has been translated automatically

Eckbert
Amateur
vomvom12 wrote on 10/25/2019 21:46: hello

this is a question for the gamblejoe team.

i am also a lot on international sites which are

are very similar to gamblejoe...casino reviews, forum,

bonus offers etc. you know what I mean and you are

probably also clear from which sides the speech is. if not

i will name some under my post.



on the subject I have noticed that on your casino Blacklist

are just 6 casinos and 2 of them because they have their affiliate

bills do not pay that may be interesting for you

but the player brings very little.

in truth, there are a hundred or more casinos that are much worse

as the 6 on your list. which are known for being

not paying players in general or the like.



i think it is naive and grossly negligent not to pay these casinos here

list only because they are not listed with you or "only" one

curacao or hold no license at all.



furthermore, you lull players into presumed security when

they only play in casinos with a license from an eu country.

malta, gibralta, etc. which is de facto wrong. the gambling

on the internet is still illegal for german players despite

eu law. prosecution is in the range of one per thousand

but a judicial proceeding in case of non-payment

of wins is nevertheless excluded no matter whether the casino

holds a license from malta, curacao, timbuktu or elsewhere.





the legal situation is understandably clarified here:





https://www.anwalt.de/rechtstipps/online-casinos-alles-illegal-oder-was_156813.html



quite detailed lists with blacklisted casinos can be found here:




---- Links to competitors removed - please note the advertising guidelines in the forum rules!







To the point Gamble Joe should blacklist casinos that are not listed here I would disagree. But here definitely more belong on the greylist. And in my opinion, one or the other on the blacklist. So a Mga symbol on a casino page has little to mean.

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon

Eckbert wrote on 10/26/2019 at 6:26 pm
To the point Gamble Joe should Blacklist casinos not listed here I would disagree. But definitely more belong on the greylist here. And in my opinion one or the other on the blacklist. So a Mga symbol on a casino page has little to mean.

Go Wild would be for me a casino listed here what belongs on the greylist. I myself have no account there and would never want to have one, with what I have read here so everything about how, for example, the notary certified documents are required there, if it comes to a payout. That would be nothing for me, if I had to visit a notary to get my won money paid out

This post has been translated automatically

Timo0510
Top Member
HIer belongs so some casino on the Greylist.viel would change but not, except that the site here has less revenue.wohin that leads everyone can think for themselves

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
Enlighten me, where would that lead?

This post has been translated automatically

Timo0510
Top Member
You know how the site works, don't you?

This post has been translated automatically

Latino
Experienced
@Timo0510:

HIer belongs so some casino on the Greylist.viel would change but not, except that the site here has less revenue.

How the site works is you aware, right?


No, this site would not have less revenue but more because it would be much more trustworthy. For me GambleJoe stands out from the usual casino comparison sites that have every crap in the top10 just because the Affiliate share is good.

GambleJoe does not have to find every casino great and adulate in your articles and thankfully does not.

This post has been translated automatically

v****2
Latino wrote on 10/27/2019 at 1:41 pm: @Timo0510:



No, this site would not have less revenue but more since you would be much more trustworthy. For me GambleJoe stands out from the usual casino comparison sites that have every crap in the top10 just because the Affiliate share is good.

GambleJoe does not have to find every casino great and adulate in your articles and thankfully does not.

that I find however also with gamblejoe one finds actually no
real junk casino in awesome contrast to some other
casino affiliate sites that apply every sxxxxß with them just because there is coal
for it. I think on the whole gamblejoe does his thing really well
really really good otherwise I would not participate here on the forum.
of course you can not do justice to everyone. my post should also only be an
improvement suggestion because for me such a list simply belongs to it
(ideally as complete as possible).
that would help beginners who know what a Blacklist is but are
not yet so familiar in the world of casinos protect against it at
any rogue casinos to deposit.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 04:34 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately