Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here (Page 33)

Topic created on 06th May. 2017 | Page: 33 of 131 | Answers: 1,304 | Views: 216,633
F****7

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

23rd May. 2019, at 10:05 am CEST#321
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
mmessner29 wrote on 22.05.2019 at 23:26: How about actually a user voting which casino is included next? You could put e.b 3. stk to choose from and everyone has to give a vote! We users have made individual experiences and can let these flow into the decision. Whether positive or negative.


can knicken!

A neutral overall ranking which is based exclusively on the experiences of independent players (the predefined criteria for a casino rating such as bonus offers or payout duration times completely left out) you will look in vain on this site (respect and respect nonetheless noted to GJ and your work) for life. The Affiliate income is just too attractive for that and the sports betting providers are just too picky or let's call it too stingy from the point of view of cooperating with such sites like GJ. A suitable word for the negative consensual agreement on collaborations would also be uninteresting.

From my view this is however unproblematic, as long as the Casinorankings are declared here also accordingly. At the latest, if the sometimes fairest and most positive providers are not even found here in the selection of winning picture uploads among hundreds of casinos, something like 'indicating alarm bells' should ring even with the very last still so naive online casino player. In the sense that the ranking may be justified, but the most important market leaders (especially sports betting providers) are completely missing.

This post has been translated automatically

Christoph
Experienced

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

23rd May. 2019, at 11:43 am CEST#322
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Fritz2007 wrote on 05/23/2019 10:05 AM

In the sense that the ranking may be justified, however the most important market leaders (especially sports betting providers) are completely missing from it.

We have tried in the past to include well-known sports betting providers such as Tipico. However, it turned out that some sports betting providers do not even want their casino section (which we consider to be the most important) to be advertised. Therefore, we cannot include some bookmakers at all in the casino comparison.

This post has been translated automatically

F****7

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

23rd May. 2019, at 01:05 pm CEST#323
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Is the listing/mention of the respective 'brands'/providers, e.g. in rankings with "evaluative" expressions of opinion/presentation (as published on pages like this one) already problematic for legal reasons?
So, for example, one of the most relevant market leaders in the field of online casino offers or sports betting online offers may not be listed by name in such rankings without their consent?
In the AGB's is already only for the players very exactly in how far they may take the brand name publicly in the mouth or not
Whereas a site without any commercial use should be allowed to list the experience values of one or more players with different casino providers theoretically also with name, or am I wrong?
Is it correct that from a corresponding commercial use / page content of a page first the consent of the respective Provider is required, even if it is only a non-binding listing without any partnerships?
Who can briefly but understandably enlighten me about the relevant legal situation? Thanks in advance
Who can either revise or confirm my previous Affiliategier submissions?

Greetings

This post has been translated automatically

Julian
Elite

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

23rd May. 2019, at 01:41 pm CEST#324
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
as a little information:

The user was banned because we found out that he was already registered in the forum in the past and was permanently banned by us.
Therefore, his new account will also be banned.

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie
Elite

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

23rd May. 2019, at 01:52 pm CEST#325
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
has the ne dedicated line with fixed IP ? lol

This post has been translated automatically

Insa24
Top Member

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

3rd Jun. 2019, at 08:51 pm CEST#326
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
A question on the side:
Is this new or only with me so that I can no longer "edit" my forum posts afterwards?
So at least most

This post has been translated automatically

Marqes
Expert

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

4th Jun. 2019, at 02:33 am CEST#327
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Insa24 wrote on 03/06/2019 at 20:51: Mal ne question on the side:
Is this new or just me that I can't "edit" my forum posts afterwards?
So at least most of them

Lol..this has been going on for probably half a year now.
You can edit posts 5 min or so, then no more.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

19th Jun. 2019, at 01:10 pm CEST#328
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Quick question about the Communicator:

Is it possible that histories are completely deleted after a certain time? I just wanted to look up the name of a person with whom I had a conversation a long time ago. However, this conversation has completely disappeared. Now I also see that my oldest history is from 03/06/18. I thought I had older histories, but I'm not 100% sure when that was.

Then I noticed that I am missing other progressions as well. The ones I can remember were between me and already deleted members though. Do histories with users who have deleted themselves or been banned disappear after a certain time? Because I'm definitely missing 3+ histories there. On the other hand, I still have a history with a deleted account that I can view

This post has been translated automatically

DiamondDonut
Top Member

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

19th Jun. 2019, at 01:18 pm CEST#329
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 06/19/2019 1:10 pm: Quick question about Communicator:

Is it possible that histories are completely deleted after a certain time? I just wanted to look up the name of a person I had a conversation with a long time ago. However, this conversation has completely disappeared. Now I also see that my oldest history is from 03/06/18. I thought I had older histories, but I'm not 100% sure when that was.

Then I noticed that I am missing other progressions as well. The ones I can remember were between me and already deleted members though. Do histories with users who have deleted themselves or been banned disappear after a certain time? Because I'm definitely missing 3+ histories there. On the other hand, I still have a history with a deleted account that I can view.

Yes bones, the histories of deleted / banned users disappear automatically.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite

Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here

19th Jun. 2019, at 01:19 pm CEST#330
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
GambleGanja wrote on 06/19/2019 1:18 pm
Yes bones,the histories of deleted/blocked users disappear automatically.

Okay do you know when too? Because the history with a deleted account I still have, others just not

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics18th Nov. 2024 at 06:26 am CET

World
0
Miscellaneous
0
World
0

GambleJoe Team

Profile picture of JulianJulian
Community-Manager / Complaint SpecialistProfile picture of CounterCounter
Software developerProfile picture of MatthiasMatthias
Project manager
Profile picture of DanielDaniel
Founder

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately