Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here (Page 136)

Topic created on 06th May. 2017 | Page: 136 of 137 | Answers: 1,364 | Views: 232,000
Falke
Expert

Langhans_innen wrote on 20.01.2025 10:15:

Why not just meet the not-too-high hurdles for monthly participation and then look forward to the lottery? Without boosters, extra sausages, special rules and other bells and whistles that favor some and disadvantage others?

Hanshanshans wrote on 20/01/2025 10:35:
Still don't understand why there should be a need for change here. It doesn't have to be turned into a two-tier society.

Those who want to write posts collect points and those who prefer to look at/comment on pictures just do that.
It could also have a negative effect on the quality of the forum if the regular users with any "wildcards/features" have less "need" to write posts. A certain laziness/convenience often creeps in faster than you think.

Edit: @Langhans, unfortunately I was in writing mode a bit longer, so we "overlapped" a bit. Even if we were quite similar in terms of content here, I'll leave it like that anyway😉

I don't understand why you can't understand that.


Example: You "only" reach 600 points in one month and then have to wait another 2 whole months until you're in the lottery. Is that fair? You simply can't expect to be equally active every month. For example, you might be on vacation for 3 weeks in the summer. Maybe you just don't want to be permanently active on GJ during your vacation just to collect points.

Or, like me, you simply don't write any extra posts just to fill up your points. If I have nothing to say on a topic, then I don't write anything.

Or, someone writes long and good posts, while others mainly stay in the chat corner, write a few one-liners and get the points together. Is that fair?

That someone doesn't participate in the lottery if you haven't reached the points completely, ok. But then waiting a whole 2 months to take part again is not fair.

I've had enough months where I had 1500 points or more. Just because I "only" reach 600 points the next month, for example, should I be blocked for 2 months and not take part in the lottery?

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite

Falke wrote on 20.01.2025 at 13:05:

Don't understand why people can't understand this.


Example: You have "only" reached 600 points in one month and then have to wait another 2 whole months until you are in the lottery. Is that fair? You simply can't expect to be equally active every month. For example, you might be on vacation for 3 weeks in the summer. Maybe you just don't want to be permanently active on GJ while on vacation just to collect points.

Or, like me, you simply don't write any extra posts just to fill up your points. If I have nothing to say on a topic, then I don't write anything.

Or, someone writes long and good posts, while others mainly stay in the chat corner, write a few one-liners and get the points together. Is that fair?

That someone doesn't take part in the lottery if you haven't reached the points completely, ok. But then waiting a whole 2 months to take part again is not fair.

I've had enough months where I had 1500 points or more. Just because I "only" reach 600 points the next month, for example, should I be blocked for 2 months and not take part in the lottery?

Such an adjustment should apply to everyone and should not be dependent on rank. User = user, regardless of rank, activity or anything else.

However, a general relaxation of the requirements would mean that new users could qualify for the lottery in the first month. So there would be more people in the Pot and GJ would - individually - get less traffic (instead of 2 months of activity for the GJ coins, it's just 1 month). A relaxation of the rule would also significantly increase the number of fake accounts.

Even if you add a time period as a requirement, e.g. 6 months, you would simply serve the time. We have seen this several times in the casino reviews.

A relaxation that applies to everyone would therefore be suboptimal. Just like a relaxation that only applies to certain people.

Nobody requires you to be very active every month. As mentioned so often, there are many ways to collect points. It's not that difficult.

This post has been translated automatically

Donnie
Elite

Falke wrote on 20.01.2025 at 13:05:

Don't understand why people can't understand this.


Example: You have "only" reached 600 points in one month and then have to wait another 2 whole months until you are in the lottery. Is that fair? You simply can't expect to be equally active every month. For example, you might be on vacation for 3 weeks in the summer. Maybe you just don't want to be permanently active on GJ while on vacation just to collect points.

Or, like me, you simply don't write any extra posts just to fill up your points. If I have nothing to say on a topic, then I don't write anything.

Or, someone writes long and good posts, while others mainly stay in the chat corner, write a few one-liners and get the points together. Is that fair?

That someone doesn't take part in the lottery if you haven't reached the points completely, ok. But then waiting a whole 2 months to take part again is not fair.

I've had enough months where I had 1500 points or more. Just because I "only" reach 600 points the next month, for example, should I be blocked for 2 months and not take part in the lottery?

You're just out of luck if you don't have time to sammeln🙆‍♂️Dann the points until the next but one month. Anyone who can afford a vacation will hardly be dependent on the coins. Then it would be better to think about something fairer for the Christmas lottery and leave the normal lottery as it is

This post has been translated automatically

Donnie
Elite
Maybe you can also set up something like a suspend button/option. If you don't have time to reach your points while on vacation, in hospital or somewhere else, you can skip a month. But that is sometimes too much effort to introduce or unnecessary

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Elite
Donnie wrote on 20.01.2025 at 14:10: Maybe you can also set up something like a suspend button/option. If you won't have time to reach your points on vacation, hospital or anywhere else, that you can then skip a month. But that is sometimes too much effort to introduce or unnecessary

Such a function already exists. You can pause your account. But I don't know whether you can keep the "streak" and whether you are spared the "penalty fee", for example. I asked Julian about this once, but he couldn't give me any more information.

This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert

Donnie wrote on 20.01.2025 at 14:10: Maybe you can also set up something like a suspend button/option. If you won't have time to reach your points on vacation, hospital or anywhere else, that you can then skip a month. But that is sometimes too much effort to introduce or unnecessary

You could also make it so that if you have reached at least half of the points, i.e. 375 in one month, you don't take part in the lottery, but you can take part again the next month with the full number of points.

This post has been translated automatically

R3hab
Elite
Actually, it's as good as it gets

This post has been translated automatically

Julian
Elite
frapi07 wrote on 20.01.2025 at 11:04: Hello Julian,

a few weeks ago I suggested that you add this note to the dashboard regarding the "penalty fee". Is there any news on this?

Thank you again for your request and your feedback.
We already have this on the screen and it was written down internally on our to-do list, as far as I remember, we just disagreed a bit about where we should add it, as there could be a lack of space in some areas or it could look too "overloaded" with information. But I will address this again at the next meeting.

frapi07 wrote on 20.01.2025 at 14:19:
There is already such a function. You can pause your account. But I don't know whether you can still keep the "streak", e.g. whether you are spared the "penalty fee". I asked Julian about this once, but he couldn't give me any more information.

In this regard, we have already created a note so that members who want to pause their account are reminded to pay out their GUTS coins beforehand in the best case, before complications could arise later.



This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert

R3hab wrote on 20.01.2025 at 15:13: Actually, it's good as it is

Yes, if you are sure that you will achieve the points in any case, then of course you don't see a problem with it. For me, however, it is not understandable that I am excluded for 2 months because I may have missed 100 points. While the next month I make twice as many, i.e. 1,500 points, and am still not in the lottery.


As I said: I don't want to write anything just to get the points full. Even if I see that I'm only 100 points short, I don't want to write anything if I can't find a topic here where I can reply and contribute something (from my point of view) that makes sense.

This post has been translated automatically

R3hab
Elite

Falke wrote on 20.01.2025 at 20:39:

Yes, if you are sure that you will achieve the points in any case, then of course you don't see a problem with that. For me, however, it is not understandable that I am excluded for 2 months because I may have missed 100 points. While the next month I make twice as many, i.e. 1,500 points, and yet I'm not in the lottery.


As I said: I don't want to write anything just to get the points full. Even if I see that I'm only 100 points short, I don't want to write something if I can't find a topic here where I can reply and contribute something (from my point of view) that makes sense.

There are several ways to get points you don't necessarily have to write posts to get points

I'm sure you know that too
Making the points fit is really not an act of effort now

What did I make the music spam thread for😁
Really ^^

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics21st Feb. 2025 at 01:02 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2025 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately