Feedback: Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here (Page 120)

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 20.01.2024 09:54:

I don't work for GJ, never claimed that my answers are true. It's just my opinion and assessment. It causes no effort? Well, maybe with 50 users. Look how many users GJ has. 44.000€ "registered - an estimated 500 active.

It's exactly these kinds of activities that look "small" but pile up. The admins also have other tasks - even outside the forum. Administrative activities etc. As I said, 2 admins less, i.e. at least 60 hours/week less and it is precisely these small tasks that come too small in such a situation.

As an example, I can tell you about a similar situation that I experienced. I worked in a small company. Suddenly an office clerk left due to pregnancy. What happened? Did the boss get a replacement? Nope. The 40-hour worker had to be replaced by the other 2 in the office. They can't split themselves into 4. So work got stuck. Who was then allowed to make up the work for an entire year? I was allowed to do it ^^ It was a job that took you 3 minutes a day. I sat on it for a week.

This post has been translated automatically

Peter8 wrote on 20.01.2024 at 10:20: Creating it is no effort.
Giving users writing rights can certainly be an extra effort of a few minutes depending on how it works which users will use it but after that you don't have to worry about it as an admin or only a little.

I think it has only positive aspects and those who don't have a game problem or don't feel like it can safely ignore it like I do with the pictures or certain posts

Frapi that is not comparable

Not everyone is addicted to gambling not everyone wants to undergo therapy or take the first step, believe me many don't want to
So there won't be masses of requests fluttering in for the GJ area
But a few might use it
So that's something completely different

Stromberg wrote on 20.01.2024 at 10:27 am:

In the end you have to do justice to everyone, if GJ has more work it has to pay off economically in a positive way, no question.


However, I would also say that threads that are only visible to logged-in members are no effort. Gimmicks such as the thread may not be seen by all members, which is of course nonsense, I agree. Then write privately.

Whether it really has a great benefit that non-members can't read along, everyone has to know for themselves. On the one hand, you are anonymous, but on the other hand, you might reveal more details about yourself in such a thread, where you might otherwise be worried that people interested in gambling from your circle of acquaintances might draw conclusions about you... 🤔 But they could also be members with any name if they know the site anyway....
I think you could introduce such an area without much effort and see if it is popular. Of course, it should only be for topics such as gambling addiction.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Falke wrote on 20.01.2024 at 01:36:

There is no social aspect to GJ that has nothing to do with gambling. Then the winning pictures would just be hidden, while you read all kinds of things about slots, casinos, wins and losses in the forum. The whole forum is simply a trigger, viewed neutrally.

frapi07 wrote on 20.01.2024 at 08:44:
To suggestion one: You could enable group chats in Communicator. You should just be able to read who the message is from before the message - e.g. frapi07 writes: Hello

You can always write to any consultant via PN. I don't see any need to create private threads or anything like that. As I said, it would take too much organizational effort and especially now that GJ has 2 admins less, it is rather difficult.

Suggestion 2: You could hide them, but let's be honest... does it do any good? I only ask because winning pictures/videos trigger me zero. As I said, GJ would lose traffic there too - that's what they live from and as I said I don't know if it would help. GJ should not be a safe place for gambling addicts, but an exchange forum. Otherwise you could also hide the forum, because you can also be triggered there (sports betting thread, how is the XXX thread going etc.) makes little sense in my eyes and doesn't solve the problem.

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1 wrote on 20.01.2024 at 15:22:

You will laugh but many people look at such pictures and videos for addictive satisfaction

This post has been translated automatically

Falke wrote on 20.01.2024 at 16:29:


I'm not laughing at this. My point was that the forum is just as addictive as the pictures. There is no difference.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1 wrote on 20.01.2024 at 15:22:
Where would GJ lose traffic? Everyone can see the pictures but only for those who have logged in and specifically activate this feature would no longer see them

gamble1 wrote on 20.01.2024 at 15:22:
I think the few people are manageable and I also think it would be a great added value because you show to the outside world "Yes gambling is our job we talk about it but are aware of the dangers of it and try everything to make it easier for quitters"

gamble1 wrote on 20.01.2024 at 15:22:
Admittedly, the benefit can also be extremely small, but the dear counter would certainly have such a function ready in less than 1 working day because, apart from the group chat function, it is not much effort to insert a point in the profile and there is a link between pressing it and, for example, a pixelated menu for pictures and videos

Theoretically, you could even deactivate individual words or threads for such people, you would only have to create a variable that tells the system that user XYZ (in this case everyone with an activated menu item) is not allowed to access it or it will be pixelated or hidden for them

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07 wrote on 21.01.2024 at 12:25:
The effort I was referring to was not about programming and implementing the features into the forum, but maintaining them.

This post has been translated automatically