Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Suggestion for improvement - Marketplace pages

Topic created on 18th Sep. 2020 | Page: 1 of 2 | Answers: 18 | Views: 3,932
gamble1
Icon
Something just came to my mind and I wanted to hear your opinion about it because I just became aware of the rule in another thread that bartering is still not welcome or forbidden on GJ

To be able to remove or change the whole rule and to create an added value for the forum would be but a kind of marketplace actually useful the automated a kind of trustee function takes over


Example: User 1 has a PSC and does not want to use it, User 2 would like to have a PSC but can not buy one anywhere

User 1 sends the code to the system via the marketplace and an offer is created for him in the marketplace area

User 2 clicks on the offer and can now buy this code with different payment methods

When both parties have done their part, the system sends the code and the money to the users


The whole thing of course does not have to be limited to PSC but can be extended as desired E-wallets etc..

To determine the quality of users who create offers, a ranking would be useful, such as completed transactions, or points received through successful transactions

I know it would be a bit more effort to program the whole thing but if you look at the benefit and the number of people who would use GJ for that reason alone it would be relatively small

In addition I have a paper from 2016 that contains large parts of the necessary code which of course the programmers could see that should take some work off and the past has shown that some sites already successfully use such a system and it is still very popular with users after years

Now I am curious how your opinions are and of course also your concerns gladly also from the team

This post has been translated automatically

DerHamburger87
Top Member
I think the idea is basically good. Anything that is innovative and, on the other hand, relieves forum areas that are bombarded with these requests is, of course, a fine thing to begin with

But I'm not the developer or programmer here and I imagine the implementation of such a marketplace system in the forum extremely difficult

I am sure that the integration of the wallets and the addition of interfaces is not only associated with effort, but also with costs. But as you said, this could be weighed up, as a certain added value would certainly be there and would increase the traffic at GJ in general.

A great suggestion and I'm looking forward to hearing more opinions

vg

This post has been translated automatically

Counter
Experienced
Good morning,

this is not a decision of the GJ team, but just a personal comment. Such a system is of course feasible from the point of view, but...
Yes, there it is, the famous but. We have forbidden the barter transactions, since it came again and again to the abuse with the barter transactions. The biggest problem with a Paysafe card is and remains that the creator of such an offer knows the code. Now the system could test the code and see if it is valid, but the creator of the offer can redeem the card code at any time within a few seconds. Such things have happened in the past. Who assumes liability in this case?
What is the use of rating the user badly. In the past we have banned users in such cases. But the damage is then already done and the excitement is huge.
How the whole thing looks from the legal side is also unknown to me.

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
Counter wrote on 09/18/2020 at 07:46: Good morning,

this here is not a decision of GJ team, but just a personal comment for now. Such a system is of course feasible from the point of view, but...
Yes there it is, the famous but. We have forbidden the barter transactions, since it came again and again to the abuse with the barter transactions. The biggest problem with a Paysafe card is and remains that the creator of such an offer knows the code. Now the system could test the code and see if it is valid, but the creator of the offer can redeem the card code at any time within a few seconds. Such things have happened in the past. Who assumes liability in this case?
What is the use of rating the user badly. In the past we have banned users in such cases. But the damage is then already done and the excitement is huge.
How the whole thing looks from the legal side is also unknown to me.

Thanks for the answer

This has already occurred to me, so I have once contacted the site operators who specifically accept PSC swaps between users to ask how their system solves such cases

As soon as I get an answer I will also add it here

A point that would come to my mind would be a Verification of the people who participate in this marketplace that would be from a legal point of view probably necessary to bring the whole thing through but I see in this case relatively few problems except for the extra work of the team

Usually cheat people in the anonymity of the Internet with a verification by the passport and the address would be a very large part already deterred

Another possibility would be the payments of the system time-delayed to carry out like e.g. the buyer of the code must confirm that it functioned and with increasing increase of the rank one could loosen the whole there a certain confidence exists

The whole thing could be coupled with the rule you have to be at least 6 months to get access to trading, then more candidates would be omitted that could disturb the peace

I realize that such a system is good and bad at the same time and also that you can't do it lightly but need a lot of planning and all possible scenarios to consider because people can be very resourceful when it comes to cheating

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
Now I have simultaneously received a response from a side of which I will now show excerpts:

Our system works against fraud by already used credit cards since each buyer and seller must load in advance his trading credit independently about the possible transaction over our side

If it should come then in exceptional cases to it that a fraud attempt is present with an already redeemed card of us a check with the responsible offerer is introduced

In this process we receive information on which day at what time for what use the card was redeemed

Subsequently, we decide at our own discretion and based on the given facts from which trading partner the fraud attempt originated and refund the other party from the available funds the credit back

We reserve the right to report any such attempt to the police and at the same time we are obligated to disclose the identity card data to the investigating authorities

It should be noted that the recorded fraud attempts in 19/20 were less than 1%, so we can proudly say that our platform offers a safe alternative


This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend
gamble1 wrote on 18.09.2020 at 06:52 clock: example : User 1 has a PSC and would like to use this but not, User 2 would like a PSC but can nowhere buy one

find the mistake who does not want to use his psc nowadays? besides, they are long --> durable

actually it works so long here over pn without problems, for mutual trust there are a few really reliable already enough

for vouchers I could imagine it rather.

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
Honestly, who turns on the police or a lawyer for 25 or 50 euros.
The injured party is angry, but will do nothing further.
The fraudster is banned and that was it.... Therefore, he will not take the even.

This post has been translated automatically

xxjj19
Experienced
Moin,

the idea is good, but cannot be implemented.

As written before, the one who offers the PSC has the code.

This will not work. This would cause too much mischief and probably calls several unserious people into the forum.

The frequency of the mischief you can see that sometimes, for example, gas stations have taken PSC from the program, because the phone is tried several times to get hold of PSC.

As said, idea is good, but that can not be implemented. Aaaaber that is not my decision

Have fun yet


This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon
xxjj19 wrote on 09/18/2020 at 12:47 pm: Moin,

the idea is good, but can not be implemented.

As written before, the one who offers the PSC has the code.

This will not work. This would cause too much mischief and probably calls several unserious people into the forum.

The frequency of the mischief is noticed by the fact that some gas stations have taken PSC from the program, because by phone is tried several times to get hold of PSC.

As said, idea is good, but that can not be implemented. Aaaaber that is not my decision

Have fun yet



@upola

Yes well so sweepingly one cannot say that if someone has little he will insist also with 25-50 € on his money someone with a mediocre income will of course really not switch on the police because of this small amount

That is but at the same time the problem why many scammers do the shit rip off 1,000 people 1 € and have earned 1,000 € if with each still so small amount the realistic danger of a pursuit would be given would look certainly different

What do you think why there is more fraud in the small area than in the large because with a lot of money every means is set in motion to find the one

@Iseedeadpeople

Vouchers you could also include that is clear PSC was now just my first thought

@xxjj19

There are several sites where this quite successfully for years and there it seems to work very well

And since I also first thought it must bring many scammers on the plan, it was so important to me to know how other companies solve this whether they are only well insured or technically solved the whole thing

How the whole thing would go off in a gamers forum of course would have to be tested but I can very well assume that there are many honest users here but you must also be realistic say certainly some who are not

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon
Then it would have to be set up like a payment page. You enter the amount to be debited on the so-called marketplace and the corresponding pin of your Paysafe card and then it is deposited there and this amount is deducted from the Paysafe card. This thing only build on trust, would go wrong in any case too often

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Dec. 2024 at 01:03 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately