Feedback: Paysafecard (Page 2)

This post has been translated automatically

Matthias wrote on 22.09.2020 at 19:05: To give a brief explanation on this on the part of GJ:
Yes, it is true, we earn money by running this portal.
100% of the revenue comes from Affiliate contracts. There are no other sources of income.
Accordingly, we do not sell any links on this site, we do not place any banner ads or layer ads.
We also do not have any advertising along the lines of "click here and get rich with casinos".

We only earn money when someone clicks on the "go to casino" links, registers at a casino, deposits money and wagers the deposited money. We make sure that we negotiate one-time commissions with all casinos.
One-time commissions for the reason that we thus remain independent and we also have the freedom to rank down a casino that possibly deteriorates in customer support or payout speed.
If we were to work together on Rev-Share, it would mean that we would have to keep a long-term business relationship with the casinos and the casinos could say "we won't pay you any more if you don't send us any players".
But that's exactly what happens - if a casino is bad, it will be rated badly by users and it will be automatically pushed down in various top lists on our site. Accordingly, the casinos get less traffic and we earn less money.
But, in the process, other casinos slide up and since we try to earn the same everywhere, we don't really care where people play. It has no advantage for us if people Deposit at Rizk, at Videoslots, or at Twin.
Some haters may not believe that, but that's exactly what we wanted - independence from individual brands.
Due to the fact that we don't have long-term contracts with casinos, unlike other affiliates, we are always able to change the advertised casinos if necessary.

I hope all questions are answered now have a nice evening!

This post has been translated automatically

Seniorfips wrote on 22/09/2020 at 19:15
All right, and what are your conditions for the inclusion of a casino? And I'm super, as you in unclear terms and conditions, groundless payout refusal crackdown on the casinos and everything for the player makes

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert wrote on 22.09.2020 at 19:04
Many sites are quickly slapped there. Often the review text is simply copied 1:1 only casino name changed. Some still change payment methods for each casino but properly test most do not.

Here you get in the form of PSC and forum already something back. But the desire for a real player pro side is not quite fulfilled here. Gamblejoe sees itself only as a mediator and rarely takes sides. Notarial letters are perfectly normal in Malta, the living conditions in DE are faded out there. Here, the mutual expectation has simply gone to pieces.

Nevertheless I am glad that there is Gamblejoe, here the discussion among each other is at least not censored. The big English side goes rather into the defensive when jmd insults a casino hard (but should the criticism be justified then comes massive pressure from the side to the casino).

This post has been translated automatically

Chrizzi wrote on 22.09.2020 at 19:37
I had the same feeling when Casino Lab was introduced. Why again one of the group...
Sure it stands out

I'm not even about giving back. But I agree with you. I read about double accounts in casinos and here to make up for something but well apparently some tick so
It is already made a lot but just not everywhere
The question is just where to... Only Daniel knows!
On the wrong path, I think he is not!

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert wrote on 22.09.2020 at 22:04
Except Daniel has been inactive for a long time rarely checks in. If I search here then he was very active in 2018 and after that not anymore. He faded into the background and I thought that was a shame. He always tried hard to defend GJ with diligence and blood and explained everything.

GJ remains in the end a good side but the problem is just how to deal with cases like Vodoodreams or Magic Red Fall. Both blocking with large sums. Also N1 with double account accusations extremely noticeable.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

20ergehtnoch wrote on 22.09.2020 at 23:41: Hater or not, the fact is: You look for transparency here in vain. GJ would rather close the site forever than ever disclose the financials.
The only thing that is certain, according to first-hand information, is that the monthly net profit is in the low five figures.

This post has been translated automatically

2****h wrote on 22.09.2020 at 23:41: Hater or not, the fact is: You look for transparency here in vain. GJ would rather close the site forever than ever disclose the financials.
The only thing that is certain, according to first-hand information, is that the monthly net profit is in the low five figures.

This post has been translated automatically

2****h wrote on 22.09.2020 at 23:41: Hater or not, the fact is: You look for transparency here in vain. GJ would rather close the site forever than ever disclose the business figures.

This post has been translated automatically