Feedback: Member blocking (Page 7)

startpage wrote on 02/21/2020 at 11:59 pm
At the end of the day GJ is a business, what needs to bring in money.

A call to write bad reviews, or cancel accounts, is among
the worst thing that can happen to GJ.
Other casino operators are also reading along here, and could be put off by this,
or let existing agreements expire. Who wants bad press?

That will be the main reason for the blocking. One sells it just differently.

You could have explained it more plausibly or advised against joining the opinion of a single user
of a single user. If that would not have brought anything, you could have seen further.

But I think the casinos want in advance that such a thing does not happen.
If it does happen, it is expected that action is taken quickly, and that is what GJ did.

That one winds itself here, since one was conscious itself that one disgruntled some regular users, knew
GJ with security, was but when weighing with the image damage was to cope with.
Ultimately, it is not about friendships or niceties, but about money.

This post has been translated automatically

redfoxx wrote on 21.02.2020 at 23:48
completely illogical

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

redfoxx wrote on 02/21/2020 at 11:47 pm: on topic:

it is quite justified to discuss the banning of Marc in a separate thread. probably such a topic is worth it more than some "achtung-betrug" post

i find by the way also, that the sanction in no relation to the "misconduct" stands, already not there (as it was already noticed by others here) comments with far awesome expressions were waved through. Justification was often the allegedly so valuable freedom of speech

This post has been translated automatically

startpage wrote on 22/02/2020 at 00:34
From GJ's point of view, the lapse was the biggest one you can get away with, namely to a call for a boycott or a
Call to rate that casino poorly. There it goes to the core of making money here. This makes ratings a farce, and therefore uninteresting for casinos to be listed here
to be listed here. That is just a supergau from an entrepreneur's point of view. The insults are in my opinion not at all
so relevant. Sure, they don't have to be, but you don't have to block for that. But it can be just
wonderfully push forward.

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira wrote on 02/22/2020 at 00:58 PM
Hm ... that suggests that Marc should have acted more subtly to make the boycott a success. Maybe the intelligence wasn't enough after all then?

This post has been translated automatically

startpage wrote on 22.02.2020 at 01:21
Is no one saying that he is intelligent. When you are so well versed in gambling, it casts a not so good
Shadow ahead. Think the time and energy he spent here invested in a job would probably be
better invested. The number of posts in such a short time suggests boredom.
As you said so well: this is only a forum, life takes place outside.
But to each his thing. If that was his world, then so be it.

I think you can't do something like that subtly. The "fake ratings" would have to look realistic, and so almost every
almost every casino gets at least an average score. If it is not, or it is recognized as a fake,
it will not be accepted as a rating.
So it is simply impossible. Of course, you can deduct a point here and there, but that's not enough.

In addition, he would have had to write to "trusted" people by PN, whether they would pull along with something, but not publicly.
That was really not smart.

But he was frustrated, because one had apparently dared here to contradict him. Probably he provoked it.


Always remember: Pride comes before a fall......

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira wrote on 22.02.2020 at 01:53
Well, it doesn't immediately say you're stupid because you happen to know about gambling. Along the way there may be x other talents in any fields. Just find it borderline when you only focus on one and the same thing. Worst case scenario: gambling, jungle camp, Bild newspaper, gambling, jungle camp, Knossi stream, gambling, etc. Some may feel addressed here. Personally, it is important to me to continue to develop. That's why I find this whole debate here just absurd, because illusory world. Can times reinsehen and go on ...

Think, three quarters of the people here are unemployed and have boredom during the day. Then you can also bite on such a topic, if the search for daily freespins is then exhausted. Maybe it has also a bissl to do with reality denial. Then such topics as here also seem highly dramatic. Nothing else happens.

By the way, he has denied intelligence to others. To what extent this is true, I do not know. I think he is a smart guy and could move a lot. But please not here.

True, such a call probably can't work subtly here. Maybe it would be better for him to find a place where his skills are appreciated. Profession halt.

This post has been translated automatically