Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Member blocking (Page 12)

Topic created on 21st Feb. 2020 | Page: 12 of 13 | Answers: 120 | Views: 20,617
upola
Legend

Patizi wrote on 23.02.2020 at 22:34
Of course I get off on this. I always report inappropriate comments immediately. <3

Nice that you also found an occupation here in the forum almost....for more it is not enough.

This post has been translated automatically

Nik89
Experienced
Bones wrote on 24.02.2020 at 11:58 am
Stupid question but who are you actually? Because the whole thing definitely took place long before January 2020? More like mid 2018?

So I'm actually reading along since the forum exists Was also registered once a long time ago, but deleted myself since I went into therapy. Unfortunately I did not get the curve

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Nik89 wrote on 24.02.2020 at 16:39
So I'm actually reading along since the forum exists Was also registered a long time ago, but deleted myself since I went into therapy. Unfortunately I didn't get my act together

The most unironically sad post in this thread. No prospect of a second turn?

This post has been translated automatically

Nik89
Experienced
Kanalmalocher wrote on 02/24/2020 at 4:58 pm
The most unironically sad post in this thread. No prospect of a second turn?

So that was my first therapy that went a total of 9 weeks. After that unfortunately only been 6 months of abstinence. There has to be a second curve since for everyone a life of gambling is no life. Except for the 3% who may really have it under control. Currently, however, I unfortunately do not have the strength to take the step again.

This post has been translated automatically

Flipstar67
Rookie
Herould wrote on 21.02.2020 at 12:28 pm
cbz490 you're right of course you are sometimes hot-headed young dynamic lads, I was also once a young hopper and when I think of myself I could also let off steam, but let's be honest, sooo extreme Marc is not at all, and he will be missed here believe me, is a smart boy the boy, it should each time hold to himself before you judge too quickly.

There is such a saying that is called:
"The wiser gives way"

The super-smart Marc should have just behave instead of throwing insults around. Disrespectful, inconsiderate and disruptive behavior has nothing at all to do with "smart"
And I certainly don't miss him!

This post has been translated automatically

Flipstar67
Rookie
Begbie wrote on 22.02.2020 at 09:58: it's about weighing, cost/benefit.
The benefit GJ gets from a user like Marc and his posts is imho much higher than the cost or trouble he causes by a slightly rougher choice of words. In addition, his choice of words was not even extremely offensive, rather direct and adapted to the level of some (not all!) Fellow discussants
It was a mistake to ban him. Also the warnings were already exaggerated. Sure, you should keep to a certain netiquette, but you're not here in a pink strawberry world, where you have to pampern the people so they do not start to cry.

Cost/benefit? Please what? What benefit? Just because he has experience - which I'm sure others have as well - was it a mistake to ban him? So would you be ok with more experienced users treating other/new users like crap just because they are more "experienced"?
Does it have to be extremely offensive before you ban a "more experienced" user?
I think not!
And especially if you write "experience" on his flag should be able to simply stand over certain things without immediately throwing insults around, even if they were not so extreme from your point of view.

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend

Flipstar67 wrote on 26.02.2020 at 11:54 am
There is such a saying that goes:
"The wiser yields"

The overly smart Marc should have just behaved himself instead of throwing insults around. Disrespectful, inconsiderate and disruptive behavior has nothing at all to do with "smart"
And I certainly don't miss him!

If the smarter one always gives in, the stupid ones win at some point.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
upola wrote on 02/24/2020 at 1:05 pm

Nice that you also found an occupation here in the forum almost....for more it is not enough.


What else is the reporting function here for? I also report only when it is appropriate.

This post has been translated automatically

Begbie
Elite
Flipstar67 wrote on 02/26/2020 at 12:25 PM
Cost/benefit? Please what? What benefit? Just because he has experience - which others certainly do - was it a mistake to ban him? So would you be ok with more experienced users treating other/new users like crap just because they are more "experienced"?
Does it have to be extremely offensive before you ban a "more experienced" user?
I think not!
And just when you write "experience" on his flag should be able to simply stand over certain things without immediately throwing insults, even if they were not so extreme from your point of view.

My goodness, the WWW is not a pink strawberry world where everyone has to love each other.
If one moves in forums, one should be able to have also ne direct word choice of the counterpart off.
And that's exactly what it was, direct language and no insult.

With benefit I do not mean his experience, but that he has actively filled the forum with useful posts. Ergo, the quality has also increased as a result. And that's definitely better for me than having to read through posts from people who are dumber than 100m of dirt road....

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
Begbie wrote on 26.02.2020 at 18:54
My goodness the WWW is not a pink strawberry world where everyone has to love each other.
If one moves in forums, one should be able to have also ne direct choice of words of the counterpart off.
And that's exactly what it was, direct language and no insult.

By usefulness I don't mean his experience, but that he actively filled the forum with useful posts. Ergo, the quality has also increased as a result. And that's definitely better for me than having to read through posts from people who are dumber than 100m of dirt road....


To call others "parasites" is simply to be seen as an insult!

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Dec. 2024 at 01:38 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately