Feedback: I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Topic created on 27th Jul. 2018 | Page: 1 of 4 | Answers: 31 | Views: 7,639
Anonym
Topic Creator
Former Member
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
27th Jul. 2018, at 05:37 pm CEST#1
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
Hello everyone,
i had opened the thread "Big Time Gaming no longer Big Time Gaming?" and wanted to see your opinions on this topic.
It's a pity that this thread was closed... I thought the moderator was also there for mediation and not just to close topics that may interest others?
The discussions were all factual until one meant (Palvez) to attack the people... it would have been there maybe rather MORE your task to point this guy on his behavior or to distribute the warnings or Strikes, which you have distributed before also so gladly to always the same users?
There would have been so many ways to clarify the matter, but for that you just have to make an effort^^
Achhhh what... nen small sentence and nen mouse click to close the thread is easier. This makes me kind of angry... I do not know. Since you should not lose the desire to post anything at all.
Well...
This post has been translated automatically
s****e
Forum posts:1.004Member has been banned
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
27th Jul. 2018, at 06:04 pm CEST#2
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
I can only agree with you. However, the provocation came from a new user, of course, the Aluhuträger are worth nothing.
There can be provoked without end, plays no role for some sheriffs here.
Also the suizidiale Thread does not cause such reactions, as some user here.
And there it would have been desirable and also necessary. That he rowed back a day later, no one could know at the time.
If a relatively new user here feels attacked by the comparison laboy, that is already amazing. He says in the thread that several hundred euros are nothing. Such an expression he had just once, so my statement is completely right.
Especially since the first provocation, as correctly recognized by Danielowitch, did not come from me. However, such a thing remains unmentioned.
Aluhüte, ****t, Depp...here remains some without consequences, if it is written out by the right people.
For Danielowitch and his thread, however, I'm sorry!
I have closed the thread because in my opinion it was no longer about the topic and also by all the provocations (triggered by several users, not just by one)
it was no longer possible to talk normally about the topic.
In addition, I know that such a dispute that is already so proceeded can not rest on itself, and it would go on constantly with the provocations.
Apart from that, the question arises where the thread should still lead? The actual topic was theoretically seen long ago from the table.
There would have been several ways to deal with it, I agree.
for example, I could have left the thread open and in return deleted all posts that contained provocations.
That again would have led to the complaint that here in the forum "censorship" prevails and others.
In this case, you will probably always find a reason to be able to expose something.
stkrie wrote on 27.07.2018 at 18:04: I can only agree with you. However, the provocation came from a new user, there are of course the Aluhuträger nothing worth.
There can be provoked without end, plays no role for some sheriffs here.
Also the suizidiale Thread does not cause such reactions, as some user here.
And there it would have been desirable and also necessary. That he rowed back a day later, no one could know at the time.
If a relatively new user here feels attacked by the comparison laboy, that is already amazing. He says in the thread that several hundred euros are nothing. Such an expression he had just once, so my statement is completely right.
Especially since the first provocation, as correctly recognized by Danielowitch, did not come from me. However, such a thing remains unmentioned.
Aluhüte, ****t, Depp...here remains some without consequences, if it is written out by the right people.
For Danielowitch and his thread, however, I'm sorry!
So I looked at the funny thread once and must confess that I found the topic itself strange. Honestly, part of gambling is playing with expectations after all. And of course the games are psychologically thought out, otherwise surely no one would play so often and for so long. The question for me is what kind of legal action one would like to take against this. But the actual question about SG Digital has already been answered.
After that, there were only insults, which didn't help anyone. The matter had built up, had become bogged down and was then closed. From my point of view, the closure was the best solution. What was still to come?
@Stkrie: Who was it that blamed you? In the reason for the closure was only that from topic was abwiffened and various users have incited each other. Why are you referring it to yourself if you are innocent? I find that quite strange when you portray yourself as a victim. What are actually Aluhuträger? Is worse than in kindergarten that you always come up with new insults here
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Topic Creator
Former Member
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
27th Jul. 2018, at 06:34 pm CEST#5
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
Julian wrote on 07/27/2018 at 18:22: Hello Danielowitch,
I closed the thread because in my opinion it was no longer about the topic and also due to all the provocations (triggered by several users, not just one)
it was no longer possible to talk normally about the topic.
In addition, I know that such a dispute that is already so proceeded can not rest on itself, and it would go on constantly with the provocations.
Apart from that, the question arises where the thread should still lead? The actual topic was theoretically seen long ago from the table.
There would have been several ways to deal with it, I agree.
for example, I could have left the thread open and in return deleted all posts that contained provocations.
That again would have led to the complaint that here in the forum "censorship" prevails and others.
In this case, you will probably always find a reason to be able to expose something.
I'm sorry but I have to disagree with you. The discussion was initially conducted normally and everyone has kept to the rules and has remained objective, until Palvez has started to attack the people and that one defends himself accordingly is absolutely ok! I do not think that this topic was off the table, because if it is about suspected fraud, such a topic should possibly also be taken seriously and exist for a long time! I would have looked at perhaps also still gladly other examples or situations of other user, experiences and opinions exchanged for which this forum is nevertheless actually also meant. In the first place, it should support the "players" something, by passing on fraud cases or strange situations and cases and gives everyone the opportunity to read this. In this case, only one person has brought the unrest in this topic... Palvez, but I have the feeling, as if you WANT to remain neutral and start to blacken certain users, although they have done nothing. Yes there were several above all better solutions.
Notify the user by PN that he should please follow the rules
The user in the thread publicly again point out that he should pay attention to his behavior
Give the user a warning
...
... and so on.
But by closing this thread, you take some a bit of the desire to post something new.
Funny I read only one user who started the provocation. Who were the others?
Or do you mean the ones who only reacted to it?
Then maybe you should rethink your statement.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Topic Creator
Former Member
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
27th Jul. 2018, at 06:37 pm CEST#7
1 Like
Liked this post: Anonym
CasinoManiac wrote on 07/27/2018 at 18:26
So I took one look at this weird thread and I have to admit that I found the topic itself odd. Honestly, part of gambling is playing with expectations after all. And of course the games are psychologically thought out, otherwise surely no one would play so often and for so long. The question for me is what kind of legal action one would like to take against this. But the actual question about SG Digital has already been answered.
After that, there were only insults, which didn't help anyone. The matter had built up, had become bogged down and was then closed. In my opinion, the closure was the best solution. What was still to come?
@Stkrie: Who was it that blamed you? In the reason for the closure was only that from topic was abwiffened and various users have incited each other. Why are you referring it to yourself if you are innocent? I find that quite strange when you portray yourself as a victim. What are actually Aluhuträger? Is worse than in kindergarten that you always come up with new insults here
Does not fit the topic and contains provocations.
I hereby ask you to adhere to the forum rules, otherwise it may lead to a permanent ban.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
27th Jul. 2018, at 08:10 pm CEST#8
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Danielowitch wrote on 07/27/2018 at 5:37 pm: Hello everyone,
i had opened the thread "Big Time Gaming no longer Big Time Gaming?" and wanted to see your opinions on this topic.
Find it very unfortunate that this thread was closed... I thought the moderator was also there for arbitrating and not just to close topics that may interest others?
The discussions were all factual until one meant (Palvez) to attack the people... it would have been there maybe rather MORE your task to point this guy on his behavior or to distribute the warnings or Strikes, which you have distributed before also so gladly to always the same users?
There would have been so many ways to clarify the matter, but for that you just have to make an effort^^
Achhhh what... nen small sentence and nen mouse click to close the thread is easier. This makes me kind of angry... I do not know. Since you should not lose the desire to post anything at all.
Well...
I have to agree with you.. But this could have been solved really different, than to close the thread immediately. The topic has me in itself very interested ...
I must confess that I now also find the closure correct. It has taken the edge off, especially since I was no longer concerned with the thread itself, but was only upset by 2 users who had approached me. I apologize for contributing to the thread having to be closed. But think that the matter was too hot to be arbitrated in a simple discussion. I apologize to all who perceived me as an aggressor stkrie and samira.
Danielowitch I'm sorry about your thread, but when you post conspiracy theories you have to expect awkward questions. @ Julian and GambleJoe: Sorry should not have let myself get carried away with emotions and give my opponents such a chance.
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Liked this post: Anonym
i had opened the thread "Big Time Gaming no longer Big Time Gaming?" and wanted to see your opinions on this topic.
It's a pity that this thread was closed... I thought the moderator was also there for mediation and not just to close topics that may interest others?
The discussions were all factual until one meant (Palvez) to attack the people... it would have been there maybe rather MORE your task to point this guy on his behavior or to distribute the warnings or Strikes, which you have distributed before also so gladly to always the same users?
There would have been so many ways to clarify the matter, but for that you just have to make an effort^^
Achhhh what... nen small sentence and nen mouse click to close the thread is easier. This makes me kind of angry... I do not know. Since you should not lose the desire to post anything at all.
Well...
This post has been translated automatically
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Liked this post: Anonym
There can be provoked without end, plays no role for some sheriffs here.
Also the suizidiale Thread does not cause such reactions, as some user here.
And there it would have been desirable and also necessary. That he rowed back a day later, no one could know at the time.
If a relatively new user here feels attacked by the comparison laboy, that is already amazing. He says in the thread that several hundred euros are nothing. Such an expression he had just once, so my statement is completely right.
Especially since the first provocation, as correctly recognized by Danielowitch, did not come from me. However, such a thing remains unmentioned.
Aluhüte, ****t, Depp...here remains some without consequences, if it is written out by the right people.
For Danielowitch and his thread, however, I'm sorry!
This post has been translated automatically
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Liked this post: CasinoManiac, Insa24
I have closed the thread because in my opinion it was no longer about the topic and also by all the provocations (triggered by several users, not just by one)
it was no longer possible to talk normally about the topic.
In addition, I know that such a dispute that is already so proceeded can not rest on itself, and it would go on constantly with the provocations.
Apart from that, the question arises where the thread should still lead? The actual topic was theoretically seen long ago from the table.
There would have been several ways to deal with it, I agree.
for example, I could have left the thread open and in return deleted all posts that contained provocations.
That again would have led to the complaint that here in the forum "censorship" prevails and others.
In this case, you will probably always find a reason to be able to expose something.
This post has been translated automatically
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Liked this post: Julian
So I looked at the funny thread once and must confess that I found the topic itself strange. Honestly, part of gambling is playing with expectations after all. And of course the games are psychologically thought out, otherwise surely no one would play so often and for so long. The question for me is what kind of legal action one would like to take against this. But the actual question about SG Digital has already been answered.
After that, there were only insults, which didn't help anyone. The matter had built up, had become bogged down and was then closed. From my point of view, the closure was the best solution. What was still to come?
@Stkrie: Who was it that blamed you? In the reason for the closure was only that from topic was abwiffened and various users have incited each other. Why are you referring it to yourself if you are innocent? I find that quite strange when you portray yourself as a victim. What are actually Aluhuträger? Is worse than in kindergarten that you always come up with new insults here
This post has been translated automatically
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Liked this post: Anonym
I'm sorry but I have to disagree with you. The discussion was initially conducted normally and everyone has kept to the rules and has remained objective, until Palvez has started to attack the people and that one defends himself accordingly is absolutely ok! I do not think that this topic was off the table, because if it is about suspected fraud, such a topic should possibly also be taken seriously and exist for a long time! I would have looked at perhaps also still gladly other examples or situations of other user, experiences and opinions exchanged for which this forum is nevertheless actually also meant. In the first place, it should support the "players" something, by passing on fraud cases or strange situations and cases and gives everyone the opportunity to read this. In this case, only one person has brought the unrest in this topic... Palvez, but I have the feeling, as if you WANT to remain neutral and start to blacken certain users, although they have done nothing. Yes there were several above all better solutions.
Notify the user by PN that he should please follow the rules
The user in the thread publicly again point out that he should pay attention to his behavior
Give the user a warning
...
... and so on.
But by closing this thread, you take some a bit of the desire to post something new.
This post has been translated automatically
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Liked this post: Anonym
triggered by multiple users, not just one
Funny I read only one user who started the provocation. Who were the others?
Or do you mean the ones who only reacted to it?
Then maybe you should rethink your statement.
This post has been translated automatically
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Liked this post: Anonym
Does not fit the topic and contains provocations.
I hereby ask you to adhere to the forum rules, otherwise it may lead to a permanent ban.
This post has been translated automatically
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Nobody has liked this post so far
I have to agree with you.. But this could have been solved really different, than to close the thread immediately. The topic has me in itself very interested ...
This post has been translated automatically
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
I have a little criticism for our moderator.
Liked this post: Julian
Danielowitch I'm sorry about your thread, but when you post conspiracy theories you have to expect awkward questions. @ Julian and GambleJoe: Sorry should not have let myself get carried away with emotions and give my opponents such a chance.
This post has been translated automatically