Feedback: Goodbye and thank you for the many bonuses and the nice community (Page 4)

dazzle_tea wrote on 06.04.2024 at 05:42: Madness!
Let me summarize:

The German state censors as it pleases in favor of Player protection (haha! ) and the (potential) victims get the slap in the face.

But nobody cares about the political implications anyway, because Ines, Berta & Fred only find state-tolerated offers from the German amusement arcades in the no-dep overview and are forced to write either farewell letters or insults.

Jumping off the cliff is also considered, but using a VPN or the No-Dep forum thread is not.

In the meantime, Paula, Otto and about 100 other users are simply too stupid to write PMs - which are now called DMs - and Udo reports everything that seems political to him to the Spanish. Or something like that.

Cool. Carry on.

This post has been translated automatically

Hanshanshans wrote on 06/04/2024 00:00:

I think players from DE can or may continue to post things in the "Bonus Section" that we ourselves of course do not, never, under any circumstances use😇.

However, this bonus would not be displayed afterwards as long as you are in Germany.

In the no-dep thread, on the other hand, freedom of expression counts, as long as nothing violates the GJ forum rules, it's allowed in there too

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1 wrote on 06.04.2024 at 03:05:
Well how many DE casinos are bitching around here as well? The GGL doesn't care about something like that, which shows even more the priorities, namely cashing in, but it should be the players who are protected or not? So why does nobody care ? Why can every casino decide what they are allowed to do and what not ?


One Provider gave someone one bonus too many and the customer ended up losing €200 because of it, others bitch about Verification, people argue about interpretations, the casinos play financial police, etc...

So where is it better than with the MGA boxes?

The only ones who don't have any problems are the Curacao casinos and to be honest Curacao used to have the worst reputation in this area and now they simply offer more than all providers put together - it's almost embarrassing how a leading system can be turned into a laughing stock in just a few years

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Cheeseburger wrote on 06.04.2024 at 12:37: Has the thread creator finally deleted his account as he intended?

This post has been translated automatically

R3hab wrote on 06.04.2024 at 11:19 am:

Curacao or Malta, what can I tell you

In Las Vegas, for example, the suicide rate is being talked down the casino games are being adjusted more and more in favor of casinos
In Roulette 2 times zero or 3, normal roulette with 1 zero is rarely found there, the machines are the horror, so do you imagine Player protection like this?
Are you saying that Germany is a hypocrite because they pretend to protect players and then change everything to suit them?
The arcades are not starving at the moment, but they have nothing to report, they are just lobbyists from the big players

I'm not saying that it's perfect or mega super good what's happening, but it's not just a lot of money that's being lost, but also social life
What you want to protect with this regulation, whether it succeeds, everyone has to determine for themselves

Basically you have to find a balance, the 5 second rule or the breaks with the depositor limit and max bet, these are all factors that make you cool down and not heat up and lose even more control and exaggerate, the opposite of what the industry wants.

So you have to look at things from several angles and well, player protection should be the highest priority.
Continuous fun without regulation will always degenerate and always end badly

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33 wrote on 06.04.2024 at 13:38:

Do you really think that the 5 sec rule or max bet 1 euro protects the addicts ?



The small gambling halls have nothing to say, the one who sets the laws is Gauselmann!

It's not for nothing that he now also has casino licenses, and I'm not talking about his arcade empire!

Gambling has become a monopoly thanks to Gauselmann, and I maintain that yes, Germany is hypocritical!
It's not for nothing that there have been so many ideological restrictions in the last 2 years!

And the regulation will also continue here at gamblejoe, my Tip is that it will soon only make sense to use gamblejoe via vpn!

This post has been translated automatically

R3hab wrote on 06.04.2024 at 11:19 am:

Curacao or Malta, what can I tell you

In Las Vegas, for example, the suicide rate is being talked down the casino games are being adjusted more and more in favor of casinos
In Roulette 2 times zero or 3, normal roulette with 1 zero is rarely found there, the machines are the horror, so do you imagine Player protection like this?
Are you saying that Germany is a hypocrite because they pretend to protect players and then change everything to suit them?
The arcades are not starving at the moment, but they have nothing to report, they are just lobbyists from the big players

I'm not saying that it's perfect or mega super good what's happening, but it's not just a lot of money that's being lost, but also social life
What you want to protect with this regulation, whether it succeeds, everyone has to determine for themselves

Basically you have to find a balance, the 5 second rule or the breaks with the depositor limit and max bet, these are all factors that make you cool down and not heat up and lose even more control and exaggerate, the opposite of what the industry wants.

So you have to look at things from several angles and well, player protection should be the highest priority.
Continuous fun without regulation will always degenerate and always end badly

This post has been translated automatically

R3hab wrote on 06.04.2024 at 14:16:

Exactly, the 2 have monopoly and certainly have power and can let the puppets play

Now make a reasonable regulation that does not disadvantage foreign companies
Player protection must also fit then you still have the local business with halls and casinos which must not be neglected either


I myself see myself as a problem gambler, but I now use Oasis and am satisfied that I no longer have access

I could also no longer switch to DE casinos, for example, because I started playing in a completely different way, like most people here
But
A person who has never had anything to do with gambling in their life will not directly become a gambler as a result of these regulations, as has happened to me and many others
What was your first bet and what is it now? How is your gambling behavior compared to the beginning? Do you understand what I'm getting at, it's the dose, everything is reduced a little so that the later damage doesn't become too heavy

That's why this regulation may not protect the hardcore addicts like me and co, but it does protect those who are new to the game
We should all approve of that, don't you think?

It's also unfortunately starting younger and younger, the children of this world should be the future and not the cow you milk
That's the sad thing about it

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1 wrote on 06.04.2024 at 14:33:

I'm not saying anything against sensible Player protection at all, but this "balance" as you describe it is a pure rip-off for us because only the private offer is affected and only online


You have 3 different rules for 3 Games of chance, some of which offer the same games, is that normal?

Unfortunately, you still haven't understood that our regulation doesn't focus on us, who are supposed to be protected. I wouldn't say anything against that if it were the case, but offline in the arcade, nobody cares how much I play in the casino, not even 3 times how much I lose per minute, and online suddenly everyone cares and they are worried about my protection? Somehow it all only makes sense when it comes to money

For years DE has lost billions because everyone gambled in Malta and Curacao and they didn't want to tolerate that anymore nothing to do with player protection but you can't say "Hey, we're taking it away from you now because we want your money"

And now please don't come to me with something like "it's normal if they want their taxes" they usually already collect enough taxes on your money and all of them usually in an almost perverse amount and still don't get their necks full

Of course, the manufacturers don't care too much, they also earn money from the casinos through the devices and there is enough money coming in from the really tough ones who take part in every shit online and in the halls, so the fools are us as customers and the providers who decide to take a very good DE license because sooner or later the point will come where no new customers are generated and everyone has to share the 1000 € per month

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Pneumatic wrote on 29.04.2024 at 21:24: He still hasn't deleted himself.
Maybe forgot password and nemmer comes into the account lol😏

This post has been translated automatically

dazzle_tea wrote on 06.04.2024 at 05:42: Madness!
Let me summarize:

The German state censors as it pleases in favor of Player protection (haha! ) and the (potential) victims get the slap in the face.

But nobody cares about the political implications anyway, because Ines, Berta & Fred only find state-tolerated offers from the German amusement arcades in the no-dep overview and are forced to write either farewell letters or insults.

Jumping off the cliff is also considered, but using a VPN or the No-Dep forum thread is not.

In the meantime, Paula, Otto and about 100 other users are simply too stupid to write PMs - which are now called DMs - and Udo reports everything that seems political to him to the Spanish. Or something like that.

Cool. Carry on.

This post has been translated automatically