Feedback: Gamblejoe scoring (Page 7)

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Peter8 wrote on 06/17/2019 at 3:44 pm: Hey bones I love your posts


Or as written above, is but shit that a user like bone, because I guess less active because of these spinners, and more of these users will fall away if nothing changes ...
But see this different than bone and think the team here will get it done

I hope so

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Bone wrote on 06/17/2019 at 3:29 pm: Yes, as Ludio says, that is the main problem here. I can understand most of the arguments here:

PSC lottery is shit for now. Personally, if I really want to gamble, I'll just pay in. I don't want to absolve myself from the fact that I like to participate in the lottery and am happy when I win. But it's not the main reason for me to participate in the forum

As often described here, the reason for the PSC action is clear and also understandable. Maybe the idea of rewarding the community resonates minimally somewhere, but the fact that this is mainly advertising and incentive, and thus a simple investment in the company, is relatively obvious and also not to be evaluated negatively. GambleJoe itself can also be quite indifferent to who wins a code

That is, on the one hand, we have a lottery of money to liven up the forum and the site. On the other hand there is the desire to run a high quality site about gambling. To somehow reconcile this is certainly not easy

Here cash money is raffled, in a forum, which consists to large parts of gambling addicts. By that I do NOT mean the absolute regular users who make meaningful posts, but the great mass of the membership. If I had to list members of Gamblejoe off the top of my head, I could think of maybe 25-40. In the lottery, however, are now well over 100 accounts qualified

I find it off-putting to write with a person who is actually someone else entirely. Or to read comments of such persons, maybe even to use my time to write a meaningful answer. In doing so, the person in question may not have even expressed an opinion, but simply made an unremarkable post with some made-up content more believable. This person is then not interested at all in what I have to say about it. This thought honestly diminishes my interest in continuing to be particularly active here. It is the simple fear combined with the logical insight that there are definitely fake and double accounts here, which mingle quite normally with the events

I understand not wanting to do away with the lottery.

I understand that it is not possible to check the identity of the members.

I understand that there is no easy solution to this problem.

I don't want to blame the GJ team at all for the situation, and I certainly don't want to impute the same ignorance as some others here. But I have found this circumstance troubling for a long time, have mentioned this very problem many times and so far it doesn't look to me like there is a solution. But I am glad to hear that it is being worked on. Sorry for the long post

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Matthias wrote on 06/17/2019 at 10:42 am: Interim info from the team meeting:
- The points you get for logging in daily have been lowered from 25 to 10 points.
So a little more activity is required to enter the monthly sweepstakes.

- The points you get for new casino reviews have been lowered from 400 to 200 points.
We are planning a big special promotion soon...

This post has been translated automatically

Falko wrote on 17.06.2019 at 15:42: What I find good, that there are only 10 points for logging in daily. So you will no longer find names in the Psc lottery of people who have never spoken here and thus do nothing at all for the forum.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically