Feedback: Gamblejoe Advent Calendar (Page 9)

Max1303 wrote on Dec 02, 2019 at 6:17 pm
You don't have to provoke me. The fact that you are infinitely sad because you didn't win a 10 Euro Paysafe card speaks for itself .




I would still be interested in how many people have participated in the lottery today. I think if you knew the numbers, then that would vllt curb the resentment something.

This post has been translated automatically

DrPepper wrote on 02.12.2019 at 18:41
Shouldn't we exclude those who have already won so that as many as possible win something this month? or most?

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Max1303 wrote on 12/02/2019 6:13 PM: Gw to the winners. Too bad there are so many sore losers

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Domkecore wrote on 02.12.2019 at 19:02 clock: So from me also congratulations ne 😉 and times quite honestly ne it should not be blocked who have already won once, but probably rather those who go off so and complain and rush because you are already so addicted that you do not begrudge anyone else to win and get upset, although it is clearly shown in the description that anyone can be drawn and every day anew! What do you not understand about it? If now one of you hetz heads 2x in a row would have won then you would be nice and quiet and everything would be top ne! Think about it how poor this is! 😉

This post has been translated automatically

DrPepper wrote on Dec 02, 2019 at 7:14 pm
Calling someone an addict and poor just because you have a different opinion, really strong of you! I always thought a forum would be there to discuss things and possibly suggest improvements, but apparently something like that is not welcome because most users here just see the opportunity to vent their frustration in which they criticize other opinions so and quickly become personal. Before I had registered here I was a long time silent reader and had to find out since then that here basically an aggressive negative mood prevails as soon as someone is just different opinion
I asked if it would not be better to simply handle the action so that people who have already won can no longer win, but others who have not yet won. Instead of saying something about this matter, you are directly attacked with "bad loser", "addicted", "you should be excluded from the action" etc... Please? Grab yourselves by the head.
Just say something about this thing pro and con criticize this proposal, but my face stop treating people directly like dirt.

This post has been translated automatically

1232153 wrote on 02/12/2019 at 19:20
Well but if you immediately get upset when you were not or not yet pulled is in my eyes already pretty much a sore loser 😂😂😂

Why should the winners be blocked just because they won 😂😂😂😂

It's a sweepstakes WTF calm down 😂😂😂

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira wrote on 02.12.2019 at 19:32: Nice action and as always not self-evident. Someone - don't remember who - already predicted that the trouble will start at the latest when a person is drawn for the second time. It's quite embarrassing when resentment overshadows such well-intentioned actions. Personally, I couldn't care less if someone wins twice, three times or even every time. If I like the person, all the better

@dr.pepper
To insinuate that she would like to have everything for herself is completely abstruse

This post has been translated automatically