robby811 wrote on 26.12.2019 at 18:55
I begrudge everyone his 1-2 PSC but should just be fairly distributed... gegenbeipiel: You're out with nem buddy but have only 2 cigarettes / gum / candy or whatever...Do you then also keep everything for themselves rather than share ??? I would always share with my friends even if each can only half raunchen....
I also write nothing more here...is not in user hand this thing anyway...
@DrPepper f**k it just brings nothing to discuss with some people here...
Thank you, there are apparently still people who are not so selfish. I'm also why no more on it, because it was leine discussion but again only pure provocation
I do not know otherwise with the sharing I was brought up so.
summer77 wrote on 12/27/2019 12:18 PM: -- post was removed because it was a double account --
i think you are purposefully spreading false messages here to --> achieve what exactly?
daniel and matthias have always emphasized that they only earn money by registering new users and do not participate in the wins or losses.
should I have read it somewhere then please copy here the place in --> however, you are the one here again and again as a multi id striking or? then you are no longer long present anyway
The poor, poor people who might get triggered by something. And earn money? Well, that's not possible at all! Best we ban the whole Internet, TV and other media - no one is triggered more, all people live then in peace, are happy and healthy. Amen.
DrPepper wrote on 12/27/2019 at 1:00 pm
Thank you, there are apparently still people who are not so selfish. I'm also why no more on it, because it was leine discussion but again just pure provocation
I do not know otherwise with the sharing I was brought up so.
then the question, have you given someone here your 2nd psc? of course not, very double moral
something with a buddy share and something with wild strangers share are 2 parr shoes. sry but my wife or my best friend I would give my last shirt, you but maximum n piece of dry bread, if you would be on the verge of starvation. for me, you are a complete stranger who is well enough to use the internet, ergo you have n roof over your head and something warm to eat or false prorities. so why should I share something with someone who goes me proverbial ass past?
Delarion wrote on 12/27/2019 at 2:27 pm
then the question, did you give someone here your 2nd psc? of course not, very double standard
share something with a buddy and share something with wild stranger are 2 parr shoes. sry but my wife or my best friend I would give my last shirt, but you maximum n piece of dry bread, if you were about to starve. for me you are a complete stranger who is well enough to use internet, ergo you have n roof over your head and something warm to eat or false prorities. so why should I share something with someone who I proverbial by the ass?
Delarion, if I were you I would be a little more attentive and not throw any false claims into the room my witty gamling colleague I received a Paysafe card and also mentioned here in the thread that if I win again I will donate it directly. We are all part of this forum and I didn't say you should share anything don't talk like the Paysafe cards GJ raffles are all yours. If anyone shares anything it is the GJ team and not you
DrPepper wrote on 12/27/2019 at 1:00 pm
Thank you, there are apparently still people who are not so selfish. I'm also why no more on it, because it was leine discussion but again just pure provocation
I do not know otherwise with the sharing I was brought up so.
On the one hand you write that one should not go into it because it <nur reine Provokation>is</nur> yes and <nur reine Provokation>then you write in the same breath <Ich kenne das auch nicht anders mit dem Teilen ich wurde so erzogen.>and thus designate all others as selfish (and before you write you have not written that, in the first sentence you have also implied).
You just have a different opinion, but you just can't accept that. And yes yes you certainly write the same as you are the only one who accepts the others and only the evil others only provoke. This regulation you you propose is simply out of self-interest and not from the inner desire to want to share.
DrPepper wrote on Dec 27, 2019 at 6:40 pm
Delarion, if I were you I would pay a little more attention and not throw any false claims in the room my witty gamling colleague I received a Paysafe card and also mentioned here in the thread that if I win again I will donate it directly. We are all part of this forum and I didn't say you should share anything don't talk like the Paysafe cards GJ raffles are all yours. If anyone shares anything it is the GJ team and not you
Exactly the Gamblejoe team is sharing and not you, they decide how a lottery looks like and they do it the right way. What you are asking for is a restriction on randomness, you don't want lotteries anymore but for Gamblejoe to distribute the cards evenly. But the distribution would not be fairer, it would even be more unfair according to the current state and you don't seem to want to understand that.
But if you absolutely want a distribution, my proposal still stands. I hope Gamblejoe just doesn't go into it any further, this ill will coupled with hypocrisy can't be beat. Every time have to emphasize why this and this is unfair and how little you need the PSC.... there I lack unfortunately the understanding.</Ich></nur>
Exactly the Gamblejoe team divides and not you, they decide how a lottery looks like and they do it the right way. What you are asking for is a restriction on randomness, you don't want lotteries anymore but for Gamblejoe to distribute the cards evenly. But the distribution would not be fairer, it would even be more unfair according to the current state and you don't seem to want to understand that.
But if you absolutely want a distribution, my proposal still stands. I hope Gamblejoe just doesn't go into it any further, this ill will coupled with hypocrisy can't be beat. Every time have to emphasize why this and this is unfair and how little you need the PSC.... there I lack unfortunately the understanding.
And what is so reprehensible about my statements? And as you already write everyone can say his opinion and this I have done? But instead of the normal here about it is discussed pros and cons is called, the people are personally approached and some shit told, because I would have received 2 cards
It would not be more unfair why? Assuming I would have won a card on Dec 1 and would have suspended for Dec 2, the probability is higher that another ne card gets
Look you insinuate me again some shit, although you know nothing at all!? What sense would have this self-interest, if I am for that everyone gets only one? I have yet received one, so I would have had no chance of a second, do you actually read through what one writes so? Likewise hjabe I also wrote that I do not want to have the second card then but will donate, where is the self-interest? My goodness...
With you it seems to go only around own interest, because you had got nevertheless probably several maps or not? Therefore, you are of course triggered by such suggestions
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
Thank you, there are apparently still people who are not so selfish. I'm also why no more on it, because it was leine discussion but again only pure provocation
I do not know otherwise with the sharing I was brought up so.
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
i think you are purposefully spreading false messages here to --> achieve what exactly?
daniel and matthias have always emphasized that they only earn money by registering new users and do not participate in the wins or losses.
should I have read it somewhere then please copy here the place in --> however, you are the one here again and again as a multi id striking or? then you are no longer long present anyway
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Liked this post: x****Y
then the question, have you given someone here your 2nd psc? of course not, very double moral
something with a buddy share and something with wild strangers share are 2 parr shoes. sry but my wife or my best friend I would give my last shirt, you but maximum n piece of dry bread, if you would be on the verge of starvation. for me, you are a complete stranger who is well enough to use the internet, ergo you have n roof over your head and something warm to eat or false prorities. so why should I share something with someone who goes me proverbial ass past?
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
Delarion, if I were you I would be a little more attentive and not throw any false claims into the room my witty gamling colleague I received a Paysafe card and also mentioned here in the thread that if I win again I will donate it directly. We are all part of this forum and I didn't say you should share anything don't talk like the Paysafe cards GJ raffles are all yours. If anyone shares anything it is the GJ team and not you
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
On the one hand you write that one should not go into it because it <nur reine Provokation>is</nur> yes and <nur reine Provokation>then you write in the same breath <Ich kenne das auch nicht anders mit dem Teilen ich wurde so erzogen.>and thus designate all others as selfish (and before you write you have not written that, in the first sentence you have also implied).
You just have a different opinion, but you just can't accept that. And yes yes you certainly write the same as you are the only one who accepts the others and only the evil others only provoke. This regulation you you propose is simply out of self-interest and not from the inner desire to want to share.
Exactly the Gamblejoe team is sharing and not you, they decide how a lottery looks like and they do it the right way. What you are asking for is a restriction on randomness, you don't want lotteries anymore but for Gamblejoe to distribute the cards evenly. But the distribution would not be fairer, it would even be more unfair according to the current state and you don't seem to want to understand that.
But if you absolutely want a distribution, my proposal still stands. I hope Gamblejoe just doesn't go into it any further, this ill will coupled with hypocrisy can't be beat. Every time have to emphasize why this and this is unfair and how little you need the PSC.... there I lack unfortunately the understanding.</Ich></nur>
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
And what is so reprehensible about my statements? And as you already write everyone can say his opinion and this I have done? But instead of the normal here about it is discussed pros and cons is called, the people are personally approached and some shit told, because I would have received 2 cards
It would not be more unfair why? Assuming I would have won a card on Dec 1 and would have suspended for Dec 2, the probability is higher that another ne card gets
Look you insinuate me again some shit, although you know nothing at all!? What sense would have this self-interest, if I am for that everyone gets only one? I have yet received one, so I would have had no chance of a second, do you actually read through what one writes so? Likewise hjabe I also wrote that I do not want to have the second card then but will donate, where is the self-interest? My goodness...
With you it seems to go only around own interest, because you had got nevertheless probably several maps or not? Therefore, you are of course triggered by such suggestions
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Liked this post: Counter, DrPepper
And you would distribute the cards fairly would probably also less going on, because the won would not look in every day
I think that Gamblejoe knows what they are doing.
This post has been translated automatically