robby811 wrote on 26.12.2019 at 18:55
I begrudge everyone his 1-2 PSC but should just be fairly distributed... gegenbeipiel: You're out with nem buddy but have only 2 cigarettes / gum / candy or whatever...Do you then also keep everything for themselves rather than share ??? I would always share with my friends even if each can only half raunchen....
I also write nothing more here...is not in user hand this thing anyway...
@DrPepper f**k it just brings nothing to discuss with some people here...
The example does not fit into a lottery at all. But let's go down to the level and construre an example:
Person A and person B do not know each other, there is a raffle party nearby (for whatever reason) and everyone can participate with 5 €. This party takes place every year, now person A wins nothing this year and asks person B to share his win with him. Person B replies that Person A should first show what he has won the last years before sharing. Person A leaves the room without a trace.
And exactly in this sense is now my new suggestion, because you and some others are the Robinhoods of the forum: Now a ranking list is set up where it is written how often a person has won and what sum. The average value of the active players is the maximum win value you are allowed to have. If you have more you get nothing more until you are below the average again, this way everyone can look forward to the same amount of gum
(That one can feel disadvantaged in a lottery I understand very well, but the attempt which takes place here is a protection of the PSC which one received in former times more frequently to receive. The number of members is increasing and one fears that one will soon not win anything, but even this regulation that is supposed to prevent too much winning will not be able to stop that. At some point it will make less than 1% difference and for that it is not worth it. At some point, the intervention in other things is also enough, you can make suggestions but lately it seems to me that a few want to determine how it should go here)
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
27th Dec. 2019, at 02:32 am CET#850
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Kleinkariert wrote on 12/27/2019 at 01:06 AM
The example doesn't fit in a lottery at all either. But let's go down to the level and construre an example:
Person A and person B do not know each other, there is a raffle party nearby (for whatever reason) and everyone can participate with 5 €. This party takes place every year, now person A wins nothing this year and asks person B to share his win with him. Person B replies that Person A should first show what he has won the last years before sharing. Person A leaves the room without a trace.
And exactly in this sense is now my new suggestion, because you and some others are the Robinhoods of the forum: Now a ranking list is set up where it is written how often a person has won and what sum. The average value of the active players is the maximum win value you are allowed to have. If you have more you get nothing more until you are below the average again, this way everyone can look forward to the same amount of gum
(That one can feel disadvantaged in a lottery I understand very well, but the attempt which takes place here is a protection of the PSC which one received in former times more frequently to receive. The number of members is increasing and one fears that one will soon not win anything, but even this regulation that is supposed to prevent too much winning will not be able to stop that. At some point it will make less than 1% difference and for that it is not worth it. At some point, the intervention in other things is also enough, you can make suggestions but lately it seems to me that a few want to determine how it should go here)
I've read to the first paragraph...then I had no more Bock and let it ^^.
Also, do not understand how you come to Robin Hood if then I'm "Robby Hood" for you also like Mr. Hood
But then I still do not understand how you come to it. Is also latte me alone again the 10min now for the text wasted time
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
27th Dec. 2019, at 02:46 am CET#851
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
but while I'm at it: I am lbsinnen sLatte who has won here in the year or since entry how often / how much,it's just about the Advent calendar action...^^
robby811 wrote on 12/27/2019 02:46: but while I'm at it: I don't care lbsinnen sLatte who has won here in the year or since entry how many times/much,it's all about the advent calendar action...^^
Edit didn't work anymore
If you don't read the posts of the opposite how do you want to discuss? The Robin Hood was a stupid allusion to the fairy tale in which the main character steals food ... from the rich and distributed to the poor. And not related to your name though of course I realize it can be quickly interpreted that way.
My point is that the chances are currently equal and all the time any rules for more <Fairness>should be introduced because some have won more than others.
My example would be the consistent version of it.</Fairness>
robby811 wrote on 12/27/2019 02:46: but while I'm at it: I don't care lbsinnen sLatte who has won here in the year or since entry how many times/much,it's all about the advent calendar action...^^
Edit no longer worked
Would like to know how many times you have complained to the lottery or other draws. Do you actually write them letters of complaint? I mean, for Lotto you even have to spend money
Let the discussion simply if you do not read through everything anyway. So you understand then also only half.
Oh and to come to your example, we are not friends. Why should I share with you?
Many thanks for the action and a pity that there are always whiners who have to criticize free actions. The chances of winning are the same for everyone and if chance has its way, then someone just comes away empty-handed. This is how the interaction of luck and bad luck works and I think it's fine that these two criteria are the decisive ones in a GLÜCKSSPIEL!!! forum
This post has been translated automatically
s****7
Forum posts:1Member has been banned
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
27th Dec. 2019, at 12:18 pm CET#856
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
-- Post was removed because it was a double account --
summer77 wrote on 12/27/2019 12:18 PM: -- post removed as this was a duplicate account --
Thanks for the clarification, we all always thought this was done just because we were loved so much. I am disappointed now...
As for the Affiliate model, you're wrong by the way I think, GJ gets money for signups as far as I know
Whether the random generator is good or bad does not matter. In the end, it remains a coincidence. And in the short term, it doesn't run according to the pattern that you would expect statistically. But it also sometimes throws out something that you don't expect. Otherwise it would not be a coincidence
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
The example does not fit into a lottery at all. But let's go down to the level and construre an example:
Person A and person B do not know each other, there is a raffle party nearby (for whatever reason) and everyone can participate with 5 €. This party takes place every year, now person A wins nothing this year and asks person B to share his win with him. Person B replies that Person A should first show what he has won the last years before sharing. Person A leaves the room without a trace.
And exactly in this sense is now my new suggestion, because you and some others are the Robinhoods of the forum: Now a ranking list is set up where it is written how often a person has won and what sum. The average value of the active players is the maximum win value you are allowed to have. If you have more you get nothing more until you are below the average again, this way everyone can look forward to the same amount of gum
(That one can feel disadvantaged in a lottery I understand very well, but the attempt which takes place here is a protection of the PSC which one received in former times more frequently to receive. The number of members is increasing and one fears that one will soon not win anything, but even this regulation that is supposed to prevent too much winning will not be able to stop that. At some point it will make less than 1% difference and for that it is not worth it. At some point, the intervention in other things is also enough, you can make suggestions but lately it seems to me that a few want to determine how it should go here)
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
I've read to the first paragraph...then I had no more Bock and let it ^^.
Also, do not understand how you come to Robin Hood if then I'm "Robby Hood" for you also like Mr. Hood
But then I still do not understand how you come to it. Is also latte me alone again the 10min now for the text wasted time
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
Edit no longer worked:
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
If you don't read the posts of the opposite how do you want to discuss? The Robin Hood was a stupid allusion to the fairy tale in which the main character steals food ... from the rich and distributed to the poor. And not related to your name though of course I realize it can be quickly interpreted that way.
My point is that the chances are currently equal and all the time any rules for more <Fairness>should be introduced because some have won more than others.
My example would be the consistent version of it.</Fairness>
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Liked this post: kersei, RebellYell
Would like to know how many times you have complained to the lottery or other draws. Do you actually write them letters of complaint? I mean, for Lotto you even have to spend money
Let the discussion simply if you do not read through everything anyway. So you understand then also only half.
Oh and to come to your example, we are not friends. Why should I share with you?
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Liked this post: kersei
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
Thanks for the clarification, we all always thought this was done just because we were loved so much. I am disappointed now...
As for the Affiliate model, you're wrong by the way I think, GJ gets money for signups as far as I know
Whether the random generator is good or bad does not matter. In the end, it remains a coincidence. And in the short term, it doesn't run according to the pattern that you would expect statistically. But it also sometimes throws out something that you don't expect. Otherwise it would not be a coincidence
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Liked this post: sippi
Isn't it too stupid for you yourself to always post the same crap here.
This post has been translated automatically