Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Gamblejoe Advent Calendar (Page 82)

Topic created on 01st Dec. 2019 | Page: 82 of 86 | Answers: 856 | Views: 151,205
Saphira
Expert
Thanks to the team for the second PSC. I was very pleased. It was a nice action

What this list is for afterwards is beyond me. Also, why one sits down at Christmas and compiles those. Should we study it carefully, maybe make flyers and distribute them in the city, or is it just to support the GJ team? That's just a rhetorical question

This post has been translated automatically

Bvb1995
Expert
Who lottery may also decide how !

I have in 48 participations also won only 2 times I get upset if Dan about my bad luck

Not about the nature of the lottery the action was and is top thanks dafur

This post has been translated automatically

DrPepper
Amateur
Patizi wrote on 12/25/2019 at 7:50 pm: Would say the next lottery is then DrPepper, Begie etc

Of course these people also all sponsor PSC out of their own pockets. Then these people can make the lottery the way they like it.

Stupid sayings and nothing behind it.

Instead of provoking you could have just respond to the arguments? But nope. prefer to fire rum
Madness that you may not even say his opinion. I have not criticized the action but only suggested an improvement, but of course that people who have won several cards do not find that so great It is a Christmas campaign and I think if everyone could have been happy about a card it would have been nicer instead of 2/3 and some 5x.
But that is somewhere also a matter of character...

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert
As I said, I'm in favor of keeping everything the same. Through the new regulation, some hope for higher chances to get something. But in my opinion, this distorts the distribution.

Most disturbs me fas people who have cleared in other actions again and again complain at every action where they are not the Jackpot winner. I have received a PSC here twice, if we do not include the mega raffle. Once when the reporting system was introduced and Matthias has rewarded all who use it and once at the monthly draw.

Including the mega raffle I estimate that I have won 140 € in PSC credits here. I would be interested in a list anyway who has won how much in total jnd where I stand. Am personally more than satisfied, if the expectation here is to get socially acceptable distributions in lotteries then you should lead the lottery yourself.

Anything but an extreme case rule I would not suggest to Gamblejoe. That would be, for example, 8 wins in 24 draws. But to limit it to 1 or 2 times... then you can give everyone a number when they will get the next PSC from Gamblejoe.

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
DrPepper wrote on 12/26/2019 05:54 PM
Stupid sayings and nothing behind them.

Instead of provoking you could have simply responded to the arguments?! But nope. rather fire rum
Madness that you may not even say his opinion. I have not criticized the action but only suggested an improvement, but of course that people who have won several cards do not find that so great It is a Christmas campaign and I think if everyone could have been happy about a card it would have been nicer instead of 2/3 and some 5x.
But that is somewhere also a matter of character...

One reads so right your aggression out.

Take it as it is! It is a lottery and not a "everyone gets something" action! If everyone would just get one, it would therefore no longer a lottery! Some have just more luck than others. That's how it is in life!

What all this has to do with character is beyond me! Be thankful for that you, WITHOUT EINSATZ, here what can win! Alternatively, you can also boycott it if you do not like the rule!

This post has been translated automatically

Fatally
Amateur
Thanks to the Gamblejoe team for the great action

This post has been translated automatically

Delarion
Amateur
DrPepper wrote on 12/26/2019 05:54 PM
Stupid sayings and nothing behind them.

Instead of provoking you could have simply responded to the arguments?! But nope. rather fire rum
Madness that you may not even say his opinion. I have not criticized the action but only suggested an improvement, but of course that people who have won several cards do not find that so great It is a Christmas campaign and I think if everyone could have been happy about a card it would have been nicer instead of 2/3 and some 5x.
But that is somewhere also a matter of character...

have also won only 2x, am I on a par with you?


criticism = complain, criticize

you criticize the execution in one tour, ergo you criticize the action. irrelevant if you like it as a whole.
face it, for every outsider it looks like displeasure, resentment towards those who won more tickets. you try to be the saint of the poor, but did you donate your 2nd win to someone who didn't win? i don't think so.

so just accept that gj draws the winners like this. of course i would have been happy about more tickets and i feel sorry for those who didn't win, but that's not up to me. you can criticize as much as you want. but think about HOW you express your criticism. you permanently whine about one and the same, adulates you as soon as someone says the same or similar criticism of the type of draw and always put yourself in the victim role, that the more have won yes you permanently make down.

according to you, those who have won something here do not even have a say, because they only want to defend their win, but that your argumentation is just bullshit does not occur to you.you do not need to be surprised that one comes to you just like you to them, because if winners only defend their win, why should one then not non- / little winners may impute only to be envious?

all just be good. criticism has arrived, think ma, to fight here permanently because there are just several opinions is kindergarten level, especially on the basis of "you won more, you may not have a say" and "you're just jealous because you won less"...

ridiculous all this

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
zuzox wrote on 25.12.2019 at 19:28: So people, I can understand some point of view, but what is the whole know-it-all in terms of lottery, it was a nice action. It is now times a lottery, there should be clear to everyone that not all can win. So gönnt it but the lucky winners, whether they are active or not plays no role.

Nice action gamblejoe and all together still reflective holidays ❤

I begrudge everyone his 1-2 PSC but should just be fairly distributed... gegenbeipiel: You're with nem buddy on the road but have only 2 cigarettes / gum / candy or whatever...Do you then also keep everything for yourself instead of sharing ??? I would always share with my friends even if each can only half raunchen....

I also write nothing more here...is not in user hand this thing anyway...

@DrPepper Just shit on it brings nothing with some people here to discuss...

This post has been translated automatically

zuzox
Experienced
robby811 wrote on 26.12.2019 at 18:55
I begrudge everyone his 1-2 PSC but should just be fairly distributed... gegenbeipiel: You're out with nem buddy but have only 2 cigarettes / gum / candy or whatever...Do you then also keep everything for themselves rather than share ??? I would always share with my friends even if each can only half raunchen....

I also write nothing more here...is not in user hand this thing anyway...

@DrPepper Just shit on it brings nothing to discuss with some people here...

Yes of course I would then share, but here everyone just has a different personal opinion, etc., as I said best be glad that something like this is done and not great discuss 😃👍

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
zuzox wrote on 26.12.2019 at 20:57
Yes of course I would share then, but here everyone just has a different personal opinion etc, as I said best to be glad that something like this is done and not discuss big 😃👍

But do not forums consist of a large part of discussion and so ^^ 👍

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Dec. 2024 at 02:35 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately