Everyone surely knows the Martingale strategy (bet on red and double on loss / doubling strategy). A strategy that dubious websites in the past liked to tout as a method to make money safely. However, as mentioned in in a previous article on GambleJoe, this strategy can lead to quick and heavy losses.
In my opinion, the inverted Martingale strategy makes more "sense". In which the stake is doubled only if you win. Of course, you will also lose with this strategy in the long run, but with the right luck, you can win something decent from time to time.
The Anti-Martingale strategy works as follows:
1. Bet a small amount on a simple chance (Red / Black, Pair / Inpair, Manque / Pasee). Let's say 2€ per coup.
2. If the coup is won, bet 4€ on the simple chance.
3. If the next coup is won again, bet 8€ on the easy chance.
4. If the game is lost from 8€ to 16€, start again with 2€ and wait for a lucky streak.
5. Set a limit and determine in which case you will take the full profit and start again.
In contrast to the Martingale system, this strategy allows you to keep a better eye on your bankroll and avoid excessive losses in the event of a losing streak.
Now, as an inexperienced Roulette player, the question arises: at what amount or how many wins in a row should I stop playing and start again from the beginning?
What you are proposing is called Paroli on easy chances. I think times so 6 times you can try to leave the bet that would be then with 2€ basic bet 128€. A series of 7 occurs every now and then. A little luck belongs of course also to it.
I personally prefer 3 series on dozens or columns. There you are with 2€ stake quickly on 54€ and that happens really often.
Basically, it is always better to place your bets at the same rate. Players who increase the stakes in the loss always fall at some point with a huge amount on the snout. So always increase only in the case of profit (Paroli play) conversely it inevitably leads at some point to total loss. Even if you are a billionaire, you will eventually reach the upper limit of the table.
wettibernd wrote on 11/30/2017 at 12:22 pm: One more thing:
Basically it is always better to make your bets in the same rate. Players who increase the stakes in the loss always fall at some point with a huge amount on the snout. So always increase only in the case of profit (Paroli play) conversely it leads inevitably sometime to the total loss. Even if you are a billionaire, you will eventually reach the upper limit of the table.
Even if you have infinite money and there are no table limits, there is still the house advantage of the casino (the zero) and in the long run, you will lose 2.8% per game (calculated on your bet).
The Anti-Martingale Strategy
Nobody has liked this post so far
In my opinion, the inverted Martingale strategy makes more "sense". In which the stake is doubled only if you win. Of course, you will also lose with this strategy in the long run, but with the right luck, you can win something decent from time to time.
The Anti-Martingale strategy works as follows:
1. Bet a small amount on a simple chance (Red / Black, Pair / Inpair, Manque / Pasee). Let's say 2€ per coup.
2. If the coup is won, bet 4€ on the simple chance.
3. If the next coup is won again, bet 8€ on the easy chance.
4. If the game is lost from 8€ to 16€, start again with 2€ and wait for a lucky streak.
5. Set a limit and determine in which case you will take the full profit and start again.
In contrast to the Martingale system, this strategy allows you to keep a better eye on your bankroll and avoid excessive losses in the event of a losing streak.
Now, as an inexperienced Roulette player, the question arises: at what amount or how many wins in a row should I stop playing and start again from the beginning?
This post has been translated automatically
The Anti-Martingale Strategy
Nobody has liked this post so far
I personally prefer 3 series on dozens or columns. There you are with 2€ stake quickly on 54€ and that happens really often.
This post has been translated automatically
The Anti-Martingale Strategy
Liked this post: Anonym
Basically, it is always better to place your bets at the same rate. Players who increase the stakes in the loss always fall at some point with a huge amount on the snout. So always increase only in the case of profit (Paroli play) conversely it inevitably leads at some point to total loss. Even if you are a billionaire, you will eventually reach the upper limit of the table.
This post has been translated automatically
The Anti-Martingale Strategy
Nobody has liked this post so far
Even if you have infinite money and there are no table limits, there is still the house advantage of the casino (the zero) and in the long run, you will lose 2.8% per game (calculated on your bet).
This post has been translated automatically
The Anti-Martingale Strategy
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
The Anti-Martingale Strategy
Nobody has liked this post so far