-
Langhans_innen, today at 11:16 am CEST
-
Endstation, today at 12:55 am CEST
-
Tekkmeweg, yesterday at 08:03 pm CEST
-
nightforce1979, today at 10:56 am CEST
-
Marlies123, today at 10:54 am CEST
-
Max_Bet, today at 10:34 am CEST
-
Majestic69, today at 10:28 am CEST
-
Olli_Eule, today at 01:44 am CEST
-
rookie, yesterday at 10:52 pm CEST
-
andjoker, yesterday at 09:39 pm CEST
-
bigbig, yesterday at 09:10 pm CEST
-
gagapapamama, yesterday at 09:07 pm CEST
-
WithoutWings, yesterday at 07:57 pm CEST
-
agnesaislami, yesterday at 07:51 pm CEST
-
upola, yesterday at 06:14 pm CEST
-
Pneumatic, yesterday at 03:16 pm CEST
-
DiegoGianni, yesterday at 03:12 pm CEST
-
BigAl87, yesterday at 04:46 am CEST
-
Spielheld, yesterday at 12:53 am CEST
-
MisterL, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 11:45 pm CEST
-
Ceset89, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 09:17 pm CEST
-
Max_Bet, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 04:29 pm CEST
-
Druff, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 03:37 pm CEST
-
Endstation, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 03:24 pm CEST
-
bigbig, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 02:29 pm CEST
-
Mutscher86, on 2nd Apr. 2025 at 11:08 am CEST
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Now you've taken away all my hope...:D
I was once convinced that you can win with this two-thirds system in the long run. You just always have to double the next bet after a loss and that can go 10-15 rounds. With a capital of 1 million +x I still believe that this can work then permanently win to make. But so much you need if really times to 15 rounds or more no hit comes.
All quite nice but in the end just too much luck in the game, in the end always wins the bank (in the long run)
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
With 1 million to verballern you certainly have other thoughts than systems to gamble
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post:
Der_Puppenspieler
The probability to win after the 15th game is not greater than after the second or third. After the end, the stakes become quite fast, quite high. There helps then partly already the million no longer and in the case of the arrival, one wins also only the original employment. That is, the first set would also have to be correspondingly high, which becomes all the more expensive out the back. I do not know any statistics, but color sequences of 20-30 times should probably occur more often than one imagines.
With a first bet of 100€ that is in round 16 already 3.276.800€ bet to win in the best case 100€, because one has lost before already 3.276.700€.
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes as I said, without proper starting capital the system is not worth it. If it's worth it at all^^ But thanks for the illustration again
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post: Anonym,
Harald_B
"Permanent wins..." in connection with "roulette" makes no sense.
Mathemathically there is no way to achieve permanent wins in roulette.
This thread is quite old, but this misconception has been around for a long time. And this can be dangerous for the inexperienced player. At the end of every Martingale strategy there is a 99,9 % total loss. Except if you stop at an earlier point in time, but who will do that if you play according to the Martingale strategy?
It makes much more sense to play with flat bets on the 2/3 chance. There you have the longest game fun
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Edit by Caro: Post visually adjusted
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post: Anonym
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Success here is probably also interpretation. Someone who plays randomly less often has in principle the same chances to win and no more. However, only those who keep the win and do not continue to play can win.
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
one weekend I won 60 euros and the next weekend I lost another 60.
Often it was a back and forth... However, I have managed over the years, not to come into the minus. Something in win remained then nevertheless over. But actually it was all too nerve-racking.
This post has been translated automatically