Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Strategies, tips & tricks: Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing. But is it true ? (Page 2)

Topic created on 02nd Feb. 2021 | Page: 2 of 3 | Answers: 22 | Views: 6,438
refucs
Expert

tEquilA wrote on 12/30/2022 at 10:55 PM


Gee, someone was actually nice enough to put a tutorial on the internet on how to get filthy rich playing Roulette with no risk. And blitzmerker like you think - yup, that sounds serious!

Ouch dude...

Now you've taken away all my hope...:D


I was once convinced that you can win with this two-thirds system in the long run. You just always have to double the next bet after a loss and that can go 10-15 rounds. With a capital of 1 million +x I still believe that this can work then permanently win to make. But so much you need if really times to 15 rounds or more no hit comes.

All quite nice but in the end just too much luck in the game, in the end always wins the bank (in the long run)

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Icon

refucs wrote on 31.12.2022 at 00:00

Now you have taken away all hope from me...:D


I was once convinced that you can win with this two-thirds system in the long run. You just always have to double the next bet after a loss and that can go 10-15 rounds. With a capital of 1 million +x I still believe that this can work then permanently win to make. But so much you need if really times to 15 rounds or more no hit comes.

All quite nice but in the end just too much luck in the game, in the end always wins the bank (in the long run)

With 1 million to verballern you certainly have other thoughts than systems to gamble

This post has been translated automatically

HuKu_Koln
Rookie
refucs wrote on 31.12.2022 at 00:00:

Now you have taken away all hope from me...:D


I was once convinced that you can win with this two-thirds system in the long run. You just always have to double the next bet after a loss and that can go 10-15 rounds. With a capital of 1 million +x I still believe that this can work then permanently win to make. But so much you need if really times to 15 rounds or more no hit comes.

All quite nice but in the end just too much luck in the game, in the end always wins the bank (in the long run)

The probability to win after the 15th game is not greater than after the second or third. After the end, the stakes become quite fast, quite high. There helps then partly already the million no longer and in the case of the arrival, one wins also only the original employment. That is, the first set would also have to be correspondingly high, which becomes all the more expensive out the back. I do not know any statistics, but color sequences of 20-30 times should probably occur more often than one imagines.

With a first bet of 100€ that is in round 16 already 3.276.800€ bet to win in the best case 100€, because one has lost before already 3.276.700€.


HuKu_Koln

This post has been translated automatically

refucs
Expert

FachstelleGSSkoeln wrote on 01.03.2023 at 18:10:
After all, the probability of winning after the 15th game is no greater than after the second or third. After the back out the stakes become quite fast, quite high. Since then partly also already the millions does not help any more and in the case of the arrival, one wins also only the original employment. That is, the first set would also have to be correspondingly high, which becomes all the more expensive out the back. I do not know any statistics, but color sequences of 20-30 times should probably occur more often than one imagines.

With a first bet of 100€ that is in round 16 already 3.276.800€ bet to win in the best case 100€, because one has lost before already 3.276.700€.


refucs

Yes as I said, without proper starting capital the system is not worth it. If it's worth it at all^^ But thanks for the illustration again

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Not to mention that there is a table limit that could slow you down even before your million.... If it is higher than the million, the minimum bet will probably be very high.

This post has been translated automatically

Butterbrezel
Elite
The whole thread is just from the basis already nonsense.

"Permanent wins..." in connection with "roulette" makes no sense.

Mathemathically there is no way to achieve permanent wins in roulette.

This thread is quite old, but this misconception has been around for a long time. And this can be dangerous for the inexperienced player. At the end of every Martingale strategy there is a 99,9 % total loss. Except if you stop at an earlier point in time, but who will do that if you play according to the Martingale strategy?

It makes much more sense to play with flat bets on the 2/3 chance. There you have the longest game fun

This post has been translated automatically

Katharina2
Top Member
Everyone who gets involved in Roulette should know that the master of generators decides about win or loss. Very nice to observe at roulette. The permanent profit does not exist, one can only optimize. Systems are their easiest prey, because predictable. You have to play like them: legally sneaky, every spin different, tested, secured, from a different system. In front of them sit professionals, to whom you have to put a lot of work to win. Incl.basic rules you have win, despite losses in between. One wants to be good to them also times. To get there, also professionals need years, with many losses before. Ideally favor Netent.

Edit by Caro: Post visually adjusted

This post has been translated automatically

wettibernd
Expert
I have been playing Roulette for over 30 years and I have met more than 100 people who have tried any system. Not one of them has become rich, rather the opposite. I can only say that in the long run the most successful players are those who play with higher stakes randomly on a simple chance, in the loss at some point double the stake (only once) and end the game as soon as they are one or two pieces in the plus and if it does not run at all also end the game with loss (the limit must be fixed beforehand). This requires an iron discipline because a game session can last sometimes only a few minutes but more often a few hours.

This post has been translated automatically

HuKu_Koln
Rookie

wettibernd wrote on 02.03.2023 at 13:03: I have been playing Roulette for over 30 years and I have met more than 100 people who have tried any systems. Not a single person has become rich, rather the opposite. I can only say that in the long run the most successful players are those who play with higher stakes randomly on a simple chance, in the loss at some point double the stake (only once) and end the game as soon as they are one or two pieces in the plus and if it does not run at all also end the game with loss (the limit must be fixed before). This requires an iron discipline because a game session can last sometimes only a few minutes but also more often a few hours.

Success here is probably also interpretation. Someone who plays randomly less often has in principle the same chances to win and no more. However, only those who keep the win and do not continue to play can win.

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite
Greed and loss of control were often the problem with me!

one weekend I won 60 euros and the next weekend I lost another 60.
Often it was a back and forth... However, I have managed over the years, not to come into the minus. Something in win remained then nevertheless over. But actually it was all too nerve-racking.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd Nov. 2024 at 12:38 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1 online
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately