Hello Roulette experts,I play often and long the EC.If I lose on the EC 40 pieces except those by the Zero get I sooner or later the pieces again?Only those by the Zero have not gone lost.Thank you in advance for the answer.
By EC he probably means the easy chances, i.e. red or black.
And no in the long run the bank always wins what you describe dear llucky1973 is a lucky streak that brings you again and again your stake but in the end your money is gone
Well, losing 40 pieces is not exactly what I would call a 'winning streak' and
getting back only if your system, strategy and gameplay fits. Only if
you already exclude Zero, I don't really understand your question......
What sense do these threads have at all if rarely to never a feedback from the TE comes? Therefore, my warning again to all who read the thread and think in Roulette there are systems with which you can win: PLEASE DO NOT .
Kleinkariert wrote on 28.10.2019 at 02:45: What is the point of these threads at all if rarely to never a feedback from the TE comes? So my warning again to all who read the thread and think in Roulette there are systems to win with: PLEASE NOT .
The question is not whether you can win something, only whether you get your bets theoretically (minus the lost at zero) back. I have often played so to Wagern when roulette counts to 100%. Since NDs sometimes a few euros remain
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Is roulette a balancing game ?
1st Feb. 2020, at 12:23 pm CET#7
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hi,
so it should not count whether you have lost 40 pieces or not, but the total result counts. Roulette is the fairest game of chance there is. Where else do you have a mathematical chance of winning almost 50 percent?
40 pieces loss are normally very quickly balanced again. Maybe I am the born lucky, but even I say that it has to do with luck only conditionally something. I would rather say it depends on the dealer. For example, in the Dragonara Casino in Malta works so a Dealer who has the habit relatively slow to turn the kettle, so that very often my favorite numbers come 29, 35, 27. I think it's because of their dropping angle and the speed of the spin.
Then I had once a dealer there I immediately stopped playing, because he turned the boiler so fast, like the intake paddle wheels of an airplane turbine
a calculation was completely impossible.
Ahso, yes also if many people will run now storm. I still say that you can't necessarily calculate the number the dealer will throw but the approximate third of where the ball will land. This is also called "kettle peeking". It still works, but not so much in OC because you have to bet before the dealer throws the ball in. The best way to do this is to bet at the very last moment.
CharlyQ wrote on 01.02.2020 at 12:23 pm: Hi,
so it should not count whether you have lost 40 pieces or not, but the overall result counts. Roulette is the fairest game of chance there is. where else do you have a mathematical chance of winning almost 50 percent?
40 pieces loss are normally very quickly balanced again. Maybe I am the born lucky, but even I say that it has to do with luck only conditionally something. I would rather say it depends on the dealer. For example, in the Dragonara Casino in Malta works so a Dealer who has the habit relatively slow to turn the kettle, so that very often my favorite numbers come 29, 35, 27. I think it's because of their dropping angle and the speed of the spin.
Then I had once a dealer there I immediately stopped playing, because he turned the boiler so fast, like the intake paddle wheels of an airplane turbine
a calculation was completely impossible.
Ahso, yes also if many people will run now storm. I still say that you can't necessarily calculate the number the dealer will throw but the approximate third of where the ball will land. This is also called "kettle peeking". It still works, but not so much in OC because you have to bet before the dealer throws the ball in. The best way to do this is to bet at the very last moment.
You don't do kettle peeking. You are just lucky at the moment.
As you said yourself. When the dealer puts the ball in the Pot, you still have a few seconds to bet. In some casinos the betting is closed before the ball is dropped. At Dublinbet it also went once about 10 seconds after the throw
Kettle watching used to be possible in land casinos and even today it is very difficult for kettle watching professionals to achieve anything because of the diamonds, bars and fuss.
And actually roulette should be a balancing game like baccard and so on. But nobody knows when the balance will come. Thus, it would also be advisable to just call and not stubbornly wait for the balance, because if you're unlucky, the table limit will throw a spanner in the works.
there would only be the system of betting on red or black and if you lose betting again on the color with double the stake because at some point you will surely win but that is where the table limits come into play and you can not double your stake
Limits are part of the game. Either you adjust your strategy, not
System, or you choose another Roulette game that suits you and where you can
where you can 'pull through'
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Liked this post: Cole666, Counter
but I often and for a long time occupy the toilet. If I lose 40 pieces on the toilet I get sooner or later only diarrhea. Well then my food is lost
This post has been translated automatically
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
And no in the long run the bank always wins what you describe dear llucky1973 is a lucky streak that brings you again and again your stake but in the end your money is gone
This post has been translated automatically
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
getting back only if your system, strategy and gameplay fits. Only if
you already exclude Zero, I don't really understand your question......
This post has been translated automatically
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
The question is not whether you can win something, only whether you get your bets theoretically (minus the lost at zero) back. I have often played so to Wagern when roulette counts to 100%. Since NDs sometimes a few euros remain
This post has been translated automatically
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
so it should not count whether you have lost 40 pieces or not, but the total result counts. Roulette is the fairest game of chance there is. Where else do you have a mathematical chance of winning almost 50 percent?
40 pieces loss are normally very quickly balanced again. Maybe I am the born lucky, but even I say that it has to do with luck only conditionally something. I would rather say it depends on the dealer. For example, in the Dragonara Casino in Malta works so a Dealer who has the habit relatively slow to turn the kettle, so that very often my favorite numbers come 29, 35, 27. I think it's because of their dropping angle and the speed of the spin.
Then I had once a dealer there I immediately stopped playing, because he turned the boiler so fast, like the intake paddle wheels of an airplane turbine
a calculation was completely impossible.
Ahso, yes also if many people will run now storm. I still say that you can't necessarily calculate the number the dealer will throw but the approximate third of where the ball will land. This is also called "kettle peeking". It still works, but not so much in OC because you have to bet before the dealer throws the ball in. The best way to do this is to bet at the very last moment.
This post has been translated automatically
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
You don't do kettle peeking. You are just lucky at the moment.
As you said yourself. When the dealer puts the ball in the Pot, you still have a few seconds to bet. In some casinos the betting is closed before the ball is dropped. At Dublinbet it also went once about 10 seconds after the throw
Kettle watching used to be possible in land casinos and even today it is very difficult for kettle watching professionals to achieve anything because of the diamonds, bars and fuss.
And actually roulette should be a balancing game like baccard and so on. But nobody knows when the balance will come. Thus, it would also be advisable to just call and not stubbornly wait for the balance, because if you're unlucky, the table limit will throw a spanner in the works.
This post has been translated automatically
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Is roulette a balancing game ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
System, or you choose another Roulette game that suits you and where you can
where you can 'pull through'
This post has been translated automatically