Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Poker in general: 3.1 million $ pot with Tom Dwan

Topic created on 14th Jun. 2023 | Page: 1 of 1 | Answers: 5 | Views: 921
Anonym
I just discovered that the record has been broken again:





Super bluff, but even better call. I'm not that deep in Poker anymore, but for me this is totally the guessing game in Tom Dwan's place. Either the opponent has AA, KK or it is a bluff. Sick hand!

This post has been translated automatically

refucs
Expert
Until the flop I would have played similar to Dwan. With the bet of Wesley then with 125k, relatively little, I would have made a re raise to 400-600 k in any case. To see if he has KK or AA. I don't think Wesley would have called again, that would have been just sick. And if he did, or even made an all in move, I would have thrown it away or folded after the turn. There would still have been a little stack there.

Basically Wesley didn't play that wrong, but somehow it was a bit too little full throttle for my taste. To pull off such a hard bluff against a Dwan with QQ on this board goes wrong 9 times out of 10.

This post has been translated automatically

refucs
Expert
But I don't understand Dwan that he waits until the river and then forced to call, after the bet from the flop was already the question of whether the AA or KK has, I would have put the opponent before the decision.

This post has been translated automatically

gambler67
Experienced
I just looked at it, in the pre flop game with raise and re-raise you can already assume that both are sitting on a monster hand with AK vs QQ is the same. On the flop comes a pair of 8s and a 3 of which 2 diamonds - the turn is blank with a 5 of hearts, the betting action I'll leave aside, the river then shows a 6 of clubs which prevents the flush and only a possible straight with 97 which is very unlikely after action or a pocket 8s to the four of a kind which is also unlikely beats everything. For this reason I don't see it as a mega bluff now with AK he thought he had the best hand on the board. Dawn himself is only beaten by the hands AA,KK or 97,88, or a set, so from my point of view it's an absolute call. Sure with the sums . you must first muster the courage - For me but all comprehensible.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

gambler67 wrote on 14.06.2023 at 20:30: For this reason I do not see it now as a mega bluff with AK he thought to have the best hand on the board. Dawn himself sees himself beaten only by the hands AA, KK and 97, 88, or a set, so from my point of view absolu a call to follow.


If he thinks he is ahead with AK, why doesn't Wesley check behind? You don't want to tell me that he bets for value. What could Dwan call worse than that? There's nothing...there, is there?

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans_innen
Expert
I'm reading your five posts here...and I'm laughing really hard. I understand only station. Maximum Thank you for this unexpectedly entertaining moment

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics23rd Nov. 2024 at 01:24 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately