Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: pictures task (Page 5)

Topic created on 06th Jun. 2020 | Page: 5 of 13 | Answers: 127 | Views: 20,109
Latino
Experienced
@redfoxx:

before you still turn into gold brooches because of all the adornment, why don't you give the psc to seniorfips. for his actually pretty smart idea

Really now ? You actually rate me as someone who is being coy ?

With the gold brooches, however, it will still be nix because I maintain the soul relationship with my wife for well over a quarter of a century and strive to make the half century (and more) full.

If I should get however again into such a situation Seniorfips will consider since I had to grin with your contribution. and no, here runs also not the gold broschending *grins *
Currently, however - and nothing is won yet (why does everyone think that?) - I will of course not issue a decree that revises the previous decree only to issue a new decree. (It's a "one man, one word" thing)

This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend
just a quick statistic and reflection for you.

since yesterday after my contribution until now, this thread was called over 700 times more (ok, by some several times, but does not matter).
--> just 4 likes more than yesterday wtf, do you think I think of something for nothing?

the realization that imposes itself on me from it is simply --> none of you has interest to grant here someone else something
it does not concern the individual of you and therefore it goes most of the a*** past

rather you give a few comments, some unnecessary, some provocative (fremdschämend) --> you always have time instead of your vote to help another to win.
super player mentality, even if it would go here for 100 the result would probably be the same

why do I write this at all?
i'm always for karma and notice it myself if you think of others first (even in real life) then it comes in one way or another always positive back to you, and it's usually not about money

also it is not about me, have nothing of it, whether now one or 1000 likes in a contribution are I do not care because I transmit the code gladly to the winner contribution you determined
--> and believe me, with such a 10er can so some...... and who knows maybe the one is then so happy that he himself distributes something --> karma just

make use of this possibility, maybe you see it as a help for self-help, as a word to sunday or whatever.
fortunately, the system prevents that none of you can like yourself.

hihihi, alternatively you can also hate and my initial post liken (so far still zero) and if this evening has more likes than the post with the most likes there is no further 10er psc --> (the 25.- are since yesterday already safe away).

of course no one must feel addressed, each individual reader his decision






This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
mowolum wrote on 21.06.2020 at 15:31
First of all the optics,which suggests a lady.Gentlemen are less likely to pick this direction.
The type of communication is difficult to classify.Quite neutral in the choice of words.I mean the message itself, if such a thing can be neutral at all.You sometimes do not know who is writing there now, female / male.Although I tendiete rather to male.The communication in the forum tends but more to the gentlemen.

soso. so if I look at the bulk of the contributions of the forum participants here (at least through the self-selected avatar and name) to be clearly classified as male, then the communication is quite often exhausted in three-line posts largely freed from punctuation. the impression of "neutrality" is possibly suggested by the often non-existent or not topic-relevant content. from time to time there are some extensions of this well-tried basic framework with some rather simple insults à la "you rag" or even inflationary use of exclamation marks reinforcing the respective statement.

(i just noticed that your posts also fit pretty well into this style pattern, mowulum - um..., Marc?)^

and: if "neutrality" is rather assigned to a male writing, does that mean in reverse, women predominantly maintain a strikingly emotional colored communication style? maybe not so "factual"?

i would possibly rethink the way of thinking.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Latino wrote on 06/21/2020 at 4:00 pm: @redfoxx:


Really ? You actually rate me as someone who is coy ?

With the Goldbroschen wills but still nix because I maintain the soul relationship to my wife already well over a quarter of a century and strive to make the half century (and more) full.

If I should get however again into such a situation Seniorfips will consider since I had to grin with your contribution. and no, here runs also not the gold broschending *grins *
Currently, however - and nothing is won yet (why does everyone think that?) - I will of course not issue a decree that revises the previous decree only to issue a new decree. (It's a "one man, one word" thing)

yo, i have felt very entertained by your contributions at one point or another

"Brooch" is really a great word, isn't it?

This post has been translated automatically

mowolum
Elite

redfoxx wrote on 21.06.2020 at 16:13
soso. so when i look at the bulk of the posts of the forum participants here (at least via the self-selected avatar and name) to be clearly classified as male, then the communication is quite often exhausted in three-line posts largely freed from punctuation. the impression of "neutrality" is possibly suggested by the often non-existent or not topic-relevant content. from time to time there are some extensions of this well-tried basic framework with some rather simple insults à la "you lapp" or even inflationary use of exclamation marks reinforcing the respective statement.

(i just noticed that your posts also fit pretty well into this style pattern, mowulum - um..., Marc?)^

and: if "neutrality" is rather assigned to a male writing, does that mean in reverse, women predominantly maintain a strikingly emotional colored communication style? maybe not so "factual"?

i would possibly rethink the way of thinking.


Sweetheart, misses the point move on

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
mowolum wrote on 06/21/2020 at 16:29

Sweetie, misses the point moving on

nope, sweetie, absolutely not. i was commenting on your response to my question regarding your question

you don't have to continue that at all, but to undermine the interlocutor by assertions like missing the point belongs to the manipulative communication tactics of rhetoric. is i so quite the smart variant. just saying, mousy.


This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend
now stop already to mobbing each other.
if here is hated then that is only allowed against me


goes but, slowly comes but movement pure above text was understood, if by some not
--> it's not about the participants liken each other (brings nothing and half is not present anyway), but that the non-participants liken the contribution that they like, that's not so hard.

This post has been translated automatically

mowolum
Elite

Iseedeadpeople wrote on 21.06.2020 at 17:07: now stop already to mobbing each other.
if there is hating here then it is only allowed against me

i hate that kind of thing

but you're right, you can also regulate somewhere else:)

This post has been translated automatically

Iknowyou
Experienced
really too bad that such a thread so degenerates
here it was just to bring a little variety and fun purely

Sometimes you have here really the feeling that only people are there who like to be provoked or provoke. Here is someone who regularly makes an effort to offer you entertainment as well as a bit of pocket money you there. concentrates also in such threads but times rather about how great such a lottery is. and discusses rather about what is or could be the best solution. Such arguments have nothing to do here. just as little as mobbing or similar
carry out such things somewhere else or via communicator
and don't let the people who have fun with this or offer you such great things suffer.

This post has been translated automatically

x****Y
If you only compare the content of the texts,
the PSC should go to Latino in my eyes. Had to smile about his text. Redfoxx would be my 2nd place

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics10th Nov. 2024 at 10:34 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately