Malganes wrote on 19.09.2024 at 22:42: What on earth has Play'n GO developed for a new slot? We're talking about Divine Divas. Until a round is finished, it's Christmas. At least I didn't really have any chance of winning. I have no idea what the free spins are like, I haven't had that pleasure yet^^. The slot is comparable to a slot that has the 5 second rule.
the slot is terrible, the animation takes forever, and then you've only won 1-2 cents.
The ultimate punishment would be to play this slot with the 5-second rule. I have no idea what the developers were thinking. But I once even had 50 cents in one go, which was of course a "big win" or was presented as such. Ridiculous.
Saphira wrote on 19.09.2024 at 22:56: The maximum penalty would be to play this slot with the 5-second rule. No idea what the developers were thinking. But I even had 50 cents in one go once, which was of course a "big win" or was presented as such. Ridiculous.
Why? The slot would be totally suitable for the 5-second rule. Almost every round lasts 5 seconds anyway, so you wouldn't notice the rule. It is much more annoying if the spin is over immediately and then a loading symbol appears.
Getting 17 EUR from 10 x 10 cent free spins is really cool. If Pragmatic then wipes out the same win to 25 cents in 3 minutes, that's very uncool again.
What about the RTP and the maxwin...?
I played a bit at betathome and tried out Apparat.
I didn't think it was bad at all, I think it was running at 89%.
I played Caesar's Legions, among others. The loading screen said win up to 6500x.
In the game it said maxwin something like 4500x.
I deposited a 10 at Jackpot piraten earlier and also started the game.
There it ran with a sensational RTP of 84%.
And in the game, in the same place as at betathome in the game, there was a maxwin of approx. 2500x....
Can it really only be the version, right? But that shouldn't really be the case...
Pat1991 wrote on September 22nd, 2024 at 10:41 pm: *Cough* *double cough*
Edit by Julian: Attached screenshot has been removed due to third-party advertising
6500x in "normal" casinos. That's probably where the value comes from.
What ridiculous stalls in Germany.
Thanks, that's probably where I thought the 6500x came from.
Sometimes maxwins are calculated differently, one indicates the "capping limit", the other the highest possible win within a spin.
But in this case, everything seems to indicate that the versions with a lower RTP are also capped lower.
So far, I've always assumed that although the probability(s) of a certain win decrease, the maxwin is still theoretically possible, even if only really theoretically.
Edit by Julian: Quote has been adjusted
That's a bit of a mess if that's not actually the case. I only noticed it with this Provider and this game.
Wanted to compare others, but it only ever says maxwin per spin apparently.
Nagging Corner
Liked this post: Malganes, Max_Bet, Saphira
the slot is terrible, the animation takes forever, and then you've only won 1-2 cents.
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Liked this post: bigbig, garfield68, Malganes, Max_Bet
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Liked this post: Malganes
Why? The slot would be totally suitable for the 5-second rule. Almost every round lasts 5 seconds anyway, so you wouldn't notice the rule. It is much more annoying if the spin is over immediately and then a loading symbol appears.
But yes, the slot itself is terrible.
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Liked this post: Malganes
20 seconds of animation for -0.5 X
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
I played a bit at betathome and tried out Apparat.
I didn't think it was bad at all, I think it was running at 89%.
I played Caesar's Legions, among others. The loading screen said win up to 6500x.
In the game it said maxwin something like 4500x.
I deposited a 10 at Jackpot piraten earlier and also started the game.
There it ran with a sensational RTP of 84%.
And in the game, in the same place as at betathome in the game, there was a maxwin of approx. 2500x....
Can it really only be the version, right? But that shouldn't really be the case...
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
Edit by Julian: Attached screenshot had to be removed due to external advertising
6500x in "normal" casinos. That's probably where the value comes from.
What ridiculous stalls in Germany.
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
Whether the post can stay like this is questionable.
I would have cut out the upper part of the screenshot for the purpose of "third-party advertising", but I'm not 100% sure if that's allowed here 😎
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
I feel restricted in my freedom of expression here 😈😈
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
Thanks, that's probably where I thought the 6500x came from.
Sometimes maxwins are calculated differently, one indicates the "capping limit", the other the highest possible win within a spin.
But in this case, everything seems to indicate that the versions with a lower RTP are also capped lower.
So far, I've always assumed that although the probability(s) of a certain win decrease, the maxwin is still theoretically possible, even if only really theoretically.
Edit by Julian: Quote has been adjusted
That's a bit of a mess if that's not actually the case. I only noticed it with this Provider and this game.
Wanted to compare others, but it only ever says maxwin per spin apparently.
This post has been translated automatically