Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Man wins around 30,000 euros in World Cup betting game, then his bet is simply canceled (Page 2)

Topic created on 10th Jul. 2018 | Page: 2 of 3 | Answers: 26 | Views: 5,071
Anonym
I find funny how many people talk here without having read the text

This post has been translated automatically

M****3
the3rdscatter wrote on 07/11/2018 at 01:12: I find it funny how many people are talking here without having read the text

Who are you referring to?

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
Quota error or misjudgement is the same for me.
With a misjudgement I say it was a quota mistake^^

How can you prove that?

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
stkrie wrote on 07/11/2018 at 01:22: Quota error or miscalculation is the same for me.
In case of a miscalculation I say it was a quota error^^

How do you prove that??

You can hardly prove it, especially since the Provider grants himself the exclusive right to decide.
But in general there is of course a difference.
A 9.5 on player A while all other betting providers offer a 1.8 is a mistake.
A misjudgement is probably more in the 0.x range and probably affects all or most providers equally.
But I think that you are also clear, you just think that it makes no difference to the customer

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
Stromberg wrote on 11.07.2018 at 11:38 am
You can hardly prove it, especially since the Provider grants himself the right to decide exclusively.
But in general there is of course a difference.
A 9.5 on player A while all other betting providers offer a 1.8 is a mistake.
A misjudgement is probably more in the 0.x range and probably affects all or most providers equally.
But I think you know that, you just think that it makes no difference to the customer😉

Exclusive rights is well put
Yes, that's what I meant.
It will be very hard to get your right there as a customer.
It's basically just a play on words.

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert
Stromberg wrote on 11.07.2018 at 11:38 am
You can hardly prove it, especially since the Provider grants himself the right to decide exclusively.
But in general there is of course a difference.
A 9.5 on player A while all other betting providers offer a 1.8 is a mistake.
A misjudgement is probably more in the 0.x range and probably affects all or most providers equally.
But I think you know that, you just think that it makes no difference to the customer

yes and why is the bet then canceled all tips were correct why not set the quote to the correct value and good is

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
MisterL wrote on 11/07/2018 at 13:06
yes and why is the bet then canceled all tips were correct why not set the quote to the correct value and good is

THE correct value does not exist. But you could have followed the odds of others or just set the incorrect odds to 1.
But instead of being accommodating, they prefer to cancel the entire bet by referring to the terms and conditions.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Metz1013 wrote on 07/11/2018 at 01:16 PM
Who are you referring to?

Maybe me because I said that I do not know to which country the 7.5 belongs.
On rereading I found it too😀

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I didn't want to name anyone personally, but most of the open questions arise from the report that the TE linked.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
the3rdscatter wrote on 07/12/2018 at 00:14: Didn't want to name anyone personally, but most of the unanswered questions just come from the report the TE linked.

I don't really see any questions in the discussion that were answered in the article.( Other than the assignment of quotas which I read over)
Anyway.
How bitter this moment must be when you look into your account and the bet has been cancelled...ðŸ˜"

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics26th Dec. 2024 at 08:48 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately