Topic created on 28th Jan. 2019 | Page: 20 of 22 | Answers: 214 | Views: 30,378
Anonym
Former Member
Let's talk about...
31st Jan. 2019, at 03:46 pm CET#191
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Knochen wrote on 01/31/2019 at 15:45: I do not comment further on this now. Of course the scenario I described was a conspiracy theory. Simply denying that doesn't change the fact. For my sake, take that as a personal attack
Edit: I really have neither time nor desire to get involved in another endless, unnecessary discussion.
it would be really great if the friends of long monologues could learn to express themselves shorter and more summarized.
the gush that some hold here, dat reads but no one through except the authors themselves.
thxalot.
robby811 wrote at 2:24pm on 2019-01-31
hahahah i break off you are the best hahahah but be careful laughter forbidden otherwise bone comes again ^^
I would just think of a bunch of this, but since I also rather do not belong to the "friends of long monologues", I'll keep it short... I like you too😁 and watch out that you ni break off, the forum needs you 🙂
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Let's talk about...
31st Jan. 2019, at 04:29 pm CET#196
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Horsepower44 wrote on 01/31/2019 at 16:18
I would just think of a bunch of this, but since I also rather do not belong to the "friends of long monologues", I'll keep it short... I like you too😁 and watch out that you ni break off, the forum needs you 🙂
No it is no longer wanted to say funny comments or anything else funny/ironic etc here. That's it for me (for the nä 15minuten in any case )
robby811 wrote on 01/31/2019 4:29 PM
No it is no longer desired to say funny comments or anything else funny/ironic etc here. That's it for me (for the next 15minutes anyway )
If you weren't suddenly talking completely off-topic to someone else in every other thread, no one would even say anything.
Also, quoting another user's post and then just making a joke about their name or linking a Youtube video that has remotely to do with their name doesn't often make sense. In moderation certainly okay, as often as you do that unfortunately annoying
In contrast to long but on-topic posts, these kinds of joke posts also have no reason to exist in a debate. You don't always have to stay strictly on topic, but you're really more often off topic than on
Bones wrote on 01/31/2019 4:32 PM
If you weren't suddenly talking completely off-topic to someone else in every other thread, no one would even say anything.
Also, quoting another user's post and then just making a joke about their name or linking to a Youtube video that is remotely related to their name is not often useful. In moderation certainly okay, as often as you do that unfortunately annoying
In contrast to long but on-topic posts, these kinds of joke posts also have no reason to exist in a debate. You don't always have to stay strictly on topic, but you're really more often off topic than on.
robby811 wrote on 01/31/2019 4:29 PM
No it is no longer desired to say funny comments or anything else funny/ironic etc here. That's it for me (for the nä 15minuten in any case )
Were you where poop?
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Let's talk about...
31st Jan. 2019, at 06:35 pm CET#200
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Kaffeelicht wrote on 01/31/2019 at 15:43
Wrong, it is not the forum management that decides what is an opinion or what is an attack, but the legal situation and also common sense.
The forum management decides what gets edited. Whether it is right to do so is another matter entirely.
Which assessments were wrong in your opinion?
And it is again strangely conspicuous that every time, if first factual is spoken or discussed, suddenly again something personal comes after it.
Why?
So someone who so insists that you should not attack anyone, refers to human rights (in an online forum where there are kindergarten disputes ) and quotes the Stbg, for such a one you insult but even quite often.
#bones
Conspiracy theory is a fighting term and no more, with which opponents are to be discredited
The term was invented by the CIA back when many doubts arose in the population about the Kennedy assassination.
This is verifiable, just by the way.
Since then, this term is used inflationary for every topic which does not fit those up there
And if one takes the word conspiracy theory per se then also each criminal investigator, public prosecutor etc. is by definition a conspiracy theorist.
Because these put up first also only theories and these are confirmed then due to facts or are rejected again.
Simply think more carefully about why we use which words in which context.
Always think for yourself and question everything you think you know.
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
Lets talk about sex baby
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
Doesn't belong here, but:
Which casino then, and what does "too" mean? Can't click Paysafe or the window doesn't open?
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Liked this post: Christoph, Horsepower44, upola
the gush that some hold here, dat reads but no one through except the authors themselves.
thxalot.
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
I would just think of a bunch of this, but since I also rather do not belong to the "friends of long monologues", I'll keep it short... I like you too😁 and watch out that you ni break off, the forum needs you 🙂
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
No it is no longer wanted to say funny comments or anything else funny/ironic etc here. That's it for me (for the nä 15minuten in any case )
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Liked this post: Anonym
If you weren't suddenly talking completely off-topic to someone else in every other thread, no one would even say anything.
Also, quoting another user's post and then just making a joke about their name or linking a Youtube video that has remotely to do with their name doesn't often make sense. In moderation certainly okay, as often as you do that unfortunately annoying
In contrast to long but on-topic posts, these kinds of joke posts also have no reason to exist in a debate. You don't always have to stay strictly on topic, but you're really more often off topic than on
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Liked this post: Horsepower44
You wanted to comment but no longer
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
Were you where poop?
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
So someone who so insists that you should not attack anyone, refers to human rights (in an online forum where there are kindergarten disputes ) and quotes the Stbg, for such a one you insult but even quite often.
#bones
Conspiracy theory is a fighting term and no more, with which opponents are to be discredited
The term was invented by the CIA back when many doubts arose in the population about the Kennedy assassination.
This is verifiable, just by the way.
Since then, this term is used inflationary for every topic which does not fit those up there
And if one takes the word conspiracy theory per se then also each criminal investigator, public prosecutor etc. is by definition a conspiracy theorist.
Because these put up first also only theories and these are confirmed then due to facts or are rejected again.
Simply think more carefully about why we use which words in which context.
Always think for yourself and question everything you think you know.
This post has been translated automatically