Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Let's talk about... (Page 11)

Topic created on 28th Jan. 2019 | Page: 11 of 22 | Answers: 214 | Views: 30,074
m****9
Lets talk about wat anneres, is me too aggro here

This post has been translated automatically

K****t
SevenEleven wrote on 01/29/2019 4:07 PM


I could if I wanted to. But I don't want to, because it would simply be a waste of time. It just wouldn't be worth it to engage in eye-to-eye discussion with you. There are several reasons for this, in my opinion. For example, you are often not able to grasp and understand some words or linguistic formulations/statements in their narrow and broader meaning. More often than you think, twenty/thirty year olds put you in their pockets verbally, without you even checking that you got the short end of the stick in a discussion. On the contrary, you celebrate yourself as the winner, even though you went down with a bang. I actually feel kind of sorry for you when I see that, even though I find you highly unsympathetic.

Rarely have I read such nonsense. Somehow I don't know whether I should laugh or cry because of the made up nonsense.
In these formulations one shows up however very clearly.
You feel inferior and try to turn the tables by humiliation.
This is a very classic behavior that expresses clear feelings of inferiority.
This already became clear when I asked you in the other topic for evidence for your claims and you also could not bring them, but with said smorgasbord of insults climbed on the palm.
Quickly deflect and shout down the other person, then you don't notice the untruths you write yourself and how inferior you feel. This is now really a well-known behavior.

The choice of words alone. "With bangs and trumpets", "winner", "lost out", "lost" - all pompous synonyms to cover up how you actually feel.

By the way.
Who is actually your ghostwriter?
I ask because your writing style has suddenly changed 100%. Not the content attacks, but your whole writing style.


Likewise, your understanding of the law (as well as your knowledge of the law) is virtually non-existent. This makes it difficult, especially for the non-laity, to deal with you adequately. But that's just by the way, because the field of law is actually crazy complex. ]

The following is an example/proof, especially for your poor understanding of words (I mark 2 words in bold, so that recognizing them might be easier for you):

Since you apparently didn't know that "that" and "you" differ in more than just spelling, the following is a brief juxtaposition in the hope that your understanding of language will then make a significant leap forward. So:


" The turns me on 0" or " The is unsexy" is a big difference to " You turns me on 0" or " I also never personally asked you to put your dick on the table (for God's sake, *brrrrrr). I wrote that I have estimated you from the age as late-pubescent á la "Come on, let's put the tails on the table... Hihi, mine is longer". This was more or less a metaphor ("you must be getting off" ditto).

Unfortunately, your knowledge of the legal situation is either very limited or you want to ignore it, so here you also try to accuse your discussion opponent of lack of knowledge.

You are allowed to make yourself knowledgeable everywhere.

And unfortunately your highlighted terms make no difference in their meaning. Whether "that" or "you" is completely irrelevant in this case, since you clearly meant me as a person.
It doesn't matter if you call a person or action/thinking of this person "unsexy & Co", because the goal is the same: A reduction of this person on a sexual level.
This is the principle of sexual harassment.
It is then not about the topic, about the core of any statements, but about the attempted humiliation on a physical level. The person in this case is nothing more than an object that "doesn't turn you on" (for example).
Also "da geht dir einen ab" is not a metaphor in this context, since you have already made it very clear that I as a person in this case was an object to be sexually humiliated.
By the way, such a form of expression is exceedingly primitive.
Subsequently, there were disparagements because of my age - and I wonder how old you consider me to be. Obviously for about 70 or 80?
Anyway, so I was a mixture of late-bubertal 20 year old, stupid, unsexy, ancient and morally reprehensible (by the way, out of the blue, just to clarify that again).
And that even now, you repeat it yes. Throws still my handling of the topic as "perverse" called behind.

You simply can't talk your way out of it.
It makes also no sense to repeat the whole topic constantly. Refrain from this harassment in the future and that's it.


You see, and if one has understood that apples are not pears, then one notices that such comparisons, like your above women-tits-show-comparison limp. But, and that is the problem, you do not recognize that. And so the circle is closed.

Your entire post is brimming with insults and put-downs. As it was before when your post was edited.

Apparently you can't help yourself.
Please ask yourself why.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite
Reported for shenanigans

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
mmessner29 wrote on 29/01/2019 at 16:28: Lets talk about wat anneres, is me too aggro here

Yes man I'm with you

This post has been translated automatically

m****9
Already se are all outvoted

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
mmessner29 wrote on 01/29/2019 at 18:05: Already se are all outvoted

Izi Pizi lemon squezzy but they will be back soon I look forward to the fireworks

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

This post has been translated automatically

m****9
I have 9 months of basic military service behind me, is already 7 years ago but I shoot back is like riding a bike that you do not unlearn! PEW PEW PEW

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
mmessner29 wrote on 29/01/2019 18:17: I have 9 months of basic military service behind me, is indeed already 7 years ago but I shoot back is like riding a bike of you do not unlearn! PEW PEW PEW

Ditto even had the golden Schützenschnurr

This post has been translated automatically

m****9
G36 or MG3? Awesome yes was also MG Schützt frozen in the bivouac in the MG nest had winter AGA Black stranded wire

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics24th Nov. 2024 at 02:02 am CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately