Dipson maybe you should first see that you get your life on the row, before you open such a blasphemy thread.
I know no forum in which the admins are not criticized.everyone has a different pain threshold in terms of provocations or insults.therefore, it will never be so really fair to go.
Counter wrote on 07/14/2018 08:52 AM
I can only give my personal opinion on this: Thank you Julian. I just feel sorry for what you have to "deal" with sometimes here on the forum.
Strange, exactly the same I wrote him yesterday however with "I feel sorry for you".
I also think he does his thing very neatly and is as neutral as a person can be. Also inform by private message I know so really from no other forum, that is already an exclusive service, especially since there is also only one moderator who has to do most of the work alone.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Julian as moderator
14th Jul. 2018, at 01:29 pm CEST#13
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Danielowitch wrote on 07/14/2018 at 01:35 PM
Totally unnecessary comment!
No reasoning at all but the main thing is to throw something out. Great job son.
I'm not really satisfied with Julian's work either... It often seems to me that he's acting too biased and very rarely deals with criticism.
But everyone can still improve or change, I'm happy to be taught better.
Father I hope I didn't upset you too much. I'll still get my pocket money this week, won't I?
LG and don't take it too seriously;)
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Julian as moderator
14th Jul. 2018, at 01:32 pm CEST#14
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Tough how some people have nothing to do and criticize the mod.
First of all I would like to say how unfavorable the whole thing looks now that Dipson or the thread creator has deleted himself after he had expressed a criticism.
Unfortunately there is not the possibility on the individual points which were expressed by him to be able to rehook, therefore I try on the other contributions here in the Thread a few answers to be able to summarize.
" Often it seems to me as if he acts too biased and very rarely comes to terms with criticism. "
I really try to stay as neutral as possible. It is important to us that EVERY user here on Gamblejoe can feel as comfortable as possible.
Therefore, we try every time in a dispute to write to the appropriate users privately to show them that we live here in no dictatorship but want to deal with the users and their problems, and if possible to help them.
Ultimately, but also to once again draw attention to the forum rules to which each individual user should adhere, and perhaps that is exactly the problem.
After all, the other users do not know who is admonished by me privately via Communicator or receives a warning and who does not, so it can of course come across as if I had only admonished the users with whom I deal publicly in the forum.
" If you ban me for this criticism now, so be it. "
Meanwhile we have to mention every day again that here on Gamblejoe NO user was banned because of his opinion or his "criticism".
Users are only admonished or warned if they do not manage to lead a normal discussion without becoming personal or having to provoke someone permanently or even insult each other or in the worst case express any death threats to other users.
But the whole thing has already had Counter this morning addressed and explained.
Yesterday, for example, there was a case where someone had written and I quote:
" Shouldn't you be in the mosque by now, I think the hate preacher will start without you today, you kipper"
And since the user had already shot before against all users, and me to be honest there also the collar burst I had written to him on it and him a last warning handed out with the reason that such "racist" statements have no place here in the forum
Where I must correct myself in retrospect of course, it was probably not directly a racist statement but nevertheless it was "xenophobia".
With it I wanted to address that I am also only a human being with which a mistake can run under, and no robot which can make everything perfectly.
Desto trotz it does not change the fact that such statements have nothing to lose here in the forum.
I would also like to thank a few users who have left a few nice words despite all the criticism towards me and help me in some way to deal with the whole situation here to be able to
Since the thread creator has deleted himself and no longer has the opportunity to comment on the topic, it would actually be appropriate to close the thread here,
But I'll leave the topic here just a bit open in case anyone has anything to say.
After all, everyone should have the privilege to be able to comment on it or, if necessary, to express criticism to me.
Dipson has always been a troll many have unfortunately not noticed.
This post has been translated automatically
W****m
Forum posts:40Member has been banned
Julian as moderator
14th Jul. 2018, at 02:40 pm CEST#17
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yesterday, for example, there was a case where someone had written and I quote:
" Shouldn't you be in the mosque by now , I think the hate preacher will start without you today otherwise , you kipper"
And since the user had already shot before against all users, and me to be honest there also the collar burst I have written to him on it
Julian, since you are trying to be neutral, please tell me the place where I have shot against all users. I would like to say here quite clearly that I exactly
against 2 users namely Knochen and Haueptling, comments have written.
So please show me the place where I have brought something against all users, interested perhaps others .
Julian wrote on 07/14/2018 at 13:48: I will close the thread here in a few hours,
I close it therefore only in a few hours because I would like to give a few users still of course the possibility to be able to express public criticism of me.
No user should have to fear certain things to address or also of course criticism of the Gamblejoe team (me included) to be able to express.
would leave it open, it happens every now and then that you want to question the one or the other, either by pn or here
@Wolfram
The place I had addressed with it among other things was in the thread "Lapalingo explains 8,000€ win for invalid"
There you have yesterday evening again a very provocative saying let go which I had subsequently deleted.
Thereupon you have also opened another thread called "Delete posts" and had written that yes apparently "several" posts of you were removed to which you had not further expressed by the way.
And whether you have now shot against 2 users or against 10 users changes unfortunately purely nothing in the situation and is totally irrelevant.
Yes I can you the stelle of yesterday of course unfortunately no longer show where you had attacked chief because I have deleted your post as I said, but nevertheless there is one or the other contribution from you that I can still gladly show you.
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
I know no forum in which the admins are not criticized.everyone has a different pain threshold in terms of provocations or insults.therefore, it will never be so really fair to go.
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
Strange, exactly the same I wrote him yesterday however with "I feel sorry for you".
I also think he does his thing very neatly and is as neutral as a person can be. Also inform by private message I know so really from no other forum, that is already an exclusive service, especially since there is also only one moderator who has to do most of the work alone.
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
Father I hope I didn't upset you too much. I'll still get my pocket money this week, won't I?
LG and don't take it too seriously;)
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
Do it better
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
First of all I would like to say how unfavorable the whole thing looks now that Dipson or the thread creator has deleted himself after he had expressed a criticism.
Unfortunately there is not the possibility on the individual points which were expressed by him to be able to rehook, therefore I try on the other contributions here in the Thread a few answers to be able to summarize.
" Often it seems to me as if he acts too biased and very rarely comes to terms with criticism. "
I really try to stay as neutral as possible. It is important to us that EVERY user here on Gamblejoe can feel as comfortable as possible.
Therefore, we try every time in a dispute to write to the appropriate users privately to show them that we live here in no dictatorship but want to deal with the users and their problems, and if possible to help them.
Ultimately, but also to once again draw attention to the forum rules to which each individual user should adhere, and perhaps that is exactly the problem.
After all, the other users do not know who is admonished by me privately via Communicator or receives a warning and who does not, so it can of course come across as if I had only admonished the users with whom I deal publicly in the forum.
" If you ban me for this criticism now, so be it. "
Meanwhile we have to mention every day again that here on Gamblejoe NO user was banned because of his opinion or his "criticism".
Users are only admonished or warned if they do not manage to lead a normal discussion without becoming personal or having to provoke someone permanently or even insult each other or in the worst case express any death threats to other users.
But the whole thing has already had Counter this morning addressed and explained.
Yesterday, for example, there was a case where someone had written and I quote:
" Shouldn't you be in the mosque by now, I think the hate preacher will start without you today, you kipper"
And since the user had already shot before against all users, and me to be honest there also the collar burst I had written to him on it and him a last warning handed out with the reason that such "racist" statements have no place here in the forum
Where I must correct myself in retrospect of course, it was probably not directly a racist statement but nevertheless it was "xenophobia".
With it I wanted to address that I am also only a human being with which a mistake can run under, and no robot which can make everything perfectly.
Desto trotz it does not change the fact that such statements have nothing to lose here in the forum.
I would also like to thank a few users who have left a few nice words despite all the criticism towards me and help me in some way to deal with the whole situation here to be able to
Since the thread creator has deleted himself and no longer has the opportunity to comment on the topic, it would actually be appropriate to close the thread here,
But I'll leave the topic here just a bit open in case anyone has anything to say.
After all, everyone should have the privilege to be able to comment on it or, if necessary, to express criticism to me.
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Liked this post: Skitch22
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
" Shouldn't you be in the mosque by now , I think the hate preacher will start without you today otherwise , you kipper"
And since the user had already shot before against all users, and me to be honest there also the collar burst I have written to him on it
Julian, since you are trying to be neutral, please tell me the place where I have shot against all users. I would like to say here quite clearly that I exactly
against 2 users namely Knochen and Haueptling, comments have written.
So please show me the place where I have brought something against all users, interested perhaps others .
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Liked this post: RiverSong
would leave it open, it happens every now and then that you want to question the one or the other, either by pn or here
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Nobody has liked this post so far
The place I had addressed with it among other things was in the thread "Lapalingo explains 8,000€ win for invalid"
There you have yesterday evening again a very provocative saying let go which I had subsequently deleted.
Thereupon you have also opened another thread called "Delete posts" and had written that yes apparently "several" posts of you were removed to which you had not further expressed by the way.
And whether you have now shot against 2 users or against 10 users changes unfortunately purely nothing in the situation and is totally irrelevant.
Yes I can you the stelle of yesterday of course unfortunately no longer show where you had attacked chief because I have deleted your post as I said, but nevertheless there is one or the other contribution from you that I can still gladly show you.
I just entered your name in the search box and discovered this post here. A contribution by you for example completely unnecessarily bones angehst:
https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/allgemeines/so-diesen-betrug-erklart-mir-mal-24055/#p24059
This post has been translated automatically
Julian as moderator
Liked this post: Anonym
@Julian
That comes out, if one asks concretely, you have nevertheless maintained, , against all users shot, ,
I have never denied it and never will, that I call this deranged bone for what it is .
And that you deleted my wonderful analysis about this slime shows that you try to be neutral, but often fail to do so.
This post has been translated automatically